Advertisement

Technological Spillovers and Export-platform FDI

  • Kjetil Bjorvatn
  • Carsten Eckel
Part of the International Economic Association Series book series (IEA)

Abstract

The literature on foreign direct investment (FDI) suggests that technological spillovers from multinational firms to local firms are, at least potentially, significant (Blomström and Kokko, 1998). Typical channels for spillovers associated with the activities of multinational enterprises (MNEs) include backward and forward linkages between foreign affiliates and local firms, demonstration effects, and labour turnover in the host country. Audretsch and Feldman (1996), Bransetter (2001) and Keller (2001) report that such spillovers are primarily local in nature — that is, intranational, rather than international. Hence, technological spillovers can affect a firm’s mode of entry into a foreign market. Analyses of entry choice in the presence of spillovers include Ethier (1984), Ethier and Markusen (1996), Siotis (1999), Fosfuri (2000), Fosfuri, Motta and Ronde (2001) and Markusen (2001). One insight from the existing literature is that spillovers reduce the incentive for technological leaders to invest in foreign markets. Typically, the literature suggests that, in order to limit spillovers, the MNE may be more inclined to choose exports or perhaps to expose its foreign competitors to a less advanced version of the MNE’s technology.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Audretsch, D. B. and M. P. Feldman (1996) ‘R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production’, American Economic Review, vol. 86(3), pp. 630–40.Google Scholar
  2. Bjorvatn, K. and C. Eckel (2005) ‘Technology Sourcing and Strategic Foreign Direct Investment’, forthcoming in Review of International Economics.Google Scholar
  3. Blomström, M. and A. Kokko (1998) ‘Multinational Corporations and Spillovers’, Journal of Economic Surveys, vol. 12(3), pp. 247–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bransetter, L. G. (2001) ‘Are Knowledge Spillovers International or Intranational in Scope? Microeconometric Evidence from the U.S. and Japan’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 53, pp. 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ethier, W. J. (1984) ‘The Multinational Firm’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 101, pp. 805–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ethier, W. J. and J. R. Markusen (1996) ‘Multinational Firms, Technology Diffusion and Trade’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 41, pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fosfuri, A. (2000) ‘Patent Protection, Imitation and the Mode of Technology Transfer’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 18, pp. 1129–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fosfuri, A., M. Motta and T. Rønde (2001) ‘Foreign Direct Investment and Spillovers through Workers’ Mobility’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 53, pp. 205–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Horstmann, I. J. and J. R. Markusen (1992) ‘Endogenous Market Structures in International Trade (Natura Facit Saltum)’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 32, pp. 109–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Keller, W. (2001) ‘International Technology Diffusion’, NBER Working Paper no. 8573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Markusen, J. R. (2001) ‘Contracts, Intellectual Property Rights and Multinational Investment in Developing Countries’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 53, pp. 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Siotis, G. (1999) ‘Foreign Direct Investment Strategies and Firms’ Capabilities’, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, vol. 8(2), pp. 251–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Economic Association 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kjetil Bjorvatn
    • 1
  • Carsten Eckel
    • 2
  1. 1.Norwegian School of Economics and Business AdministrationBergenNorway
  2. 2.University of GöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations