‘In Darkest Lambeth’: Henry Morton Stanley and the Imperial Politics of London Unionism

  • Alex Windscheffel

Abstract

The culture of imperialism permeated late Victorian and Edwardian London. As the imperial capital, the ‘heart of the empire’, London was a cosmopolitan, international city, governing vast swathes of the globe. The imperial nature of the city clearly distinguished Londoners from the inhabitants of other English towns and cities.1 As Jonathan Schneer has demonstrated in his pioneering study of the ‘imperial metropolis’, London — its public spaces, monuments and cultural preferences, as well as its inhabitants — was closely defined and reshaped by its imperial character.2 Recent research has elaborated the extent to which metropolis and empire were mutually constitutive and intersecting sites. Michael Port has drawn attention to the imperial nature of the capital’s architecture,3 although some politicians complained that the capital lacked the imperial grandeur of Berlin and Paris.4 Antoinette Burton has deployed postcolonial theory to scrutinize London as an unstable site for traffic, interaction and encounter between colonizer and colonial subject, with the potential to subvert imperial hierarchies.5 Angela Woollacott has investigated how white Australian women travelled to and negotiated the public spaces of the imperial metropolis as part of a process of self-identification.6 Yet, few historians have addressed the influence of imperialism upon the politics of late Victorian London.

Keywords

Europe Assure Ghost Boulder Defend 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    London was thus closer to Glasgow and Belfast than provincial English cities: J. MacKenzie, ‘“The Second City of the Empire”: Glasgow — Imperial Municipality’, in F. Driver and D. Gilbert (eds) Imperial Cities: Landscape, Display and Identity (Manchester, 1999), pp. 215–37.Google Scholar
  2. For a provincial example (Birmingham): C. Hall, Civilising Subjects: Metropole and Colony in the English Imagination 1830–1867 (Oxford, 2002), pp. 265–433.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    J. Schneer, London 1900: the Imperial Metropolis (New Haven, 1999) esp. pp. 3–14, 93–115, 259–63: his definition of ‘London’ excludes suburban districts.Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    M. Port, Imperial London: Civil Government Building in London, 1850–1915 (London, 1995); Schneer, London 1900, pp. 17–36.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Burton, At the Heart of the Empire: Indians and the Colonial Encounter in Late-Victorian Britain (Berkeley, 1998) esp. pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
  6. R. Visram, Ayahs, Lascars and Princes: Indians in Britain 1700–1947 (London, 1986).Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    A. Woollacott, To Try her Fortune in London: Australian Women, Colonialism and Modernity (Oxford, 2001), esp. pp. 47–65.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    J. Marriott, Metropolis, India and Progress in the Colonial Imagination (Manchester, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 8.
    E. Dicey, ‘The Triumph of Conservatism’, Quarterly Review, 182, October (1895), 538–67.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    H. Cunningham, ‘The Language of Patriotism, 1750–1914’, in R. Samuel (ed.) Patriotism: the Making and Unmaking of British National Identity, vol. 1 (London, 1989).Google Scholar
  11. R. Colls and P. Dodd (eds) Englishness: Politics and Culture, 1880–1920 (London 1986), pp. 283–307.Google Scholar
  12. 19.
    Star, 27 October 1900. The phrase was famously used by Charles Masterman in The Heart of the Empire (London, 1901). Conservatives did not entirely deny this interpretation of imperial values: Evening News, 20 October 1900.Google Scholar
  13. 20.
    Cited in F. M. Leventhal, Respectable Radical: George Howell and Victorian Working-Class Politics (London, 1971), p. 212.Google Scholar
  14. 21.
    John Hinnells and Omar Ralph, Bhownaggree: Member of Parliament, 1895–1906 (London, 1995).Google Scholar
  15. John Hinnells, Zoroastrians in Britain (Oxford 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 24.
    Naoroji, also a Parsi, has received far greater attention from historians than Bhownaggree. O. Ralph, Naoroji: The First Asian MP. A Biography of Dadabhai Naoroji: India’s Patriot and Britain’s MP (Hansib, 1997); Schneer, London 1900, ch. viii; Visram, Ayahs, pp. 78–92. Lalmohan Ghose stood unsuccessfully as a Liberal for Deptford in 1885 and 1886.Google Scholar
  17. 25.
    F. McLynn, Stanley: Sorcerer’s Apprentice (London, 1991), p. 372; Obituary, Standard, 11 May 1904: ‘In parliament, the part that Stanley played was inconspicuous’.Google Scholar
  18. 26.
    Cornhill Magazine, July 1904, cited in D. Stanley (ed.), The Autobiography of Sir Henry Morton Stanley (London, 1909), pp. 392, 394.Google Scholar
  19. 27.
    J. L. Newman, Imperial Footprints: Henry Morton Stanley’s African Journeys (Washington, 2004).Google Scholar
  20. F. McLynn, Stanley: the Making of an African Explorer (London, 1988).Google Scholar
  21. R. Hall, Stanley: An Adventurer Explored (London, 1974).Google Scholar
  22. Cf. J. Bierman, Dark Safari: the Life behind the Legend of Sir Henry Morton Stanley (New York, 1990).Google Scholar
  23. 28.
    H. M. Stanley, In Darkest Africa — or the Quest, Rescue and Retreat of Emin, Governor of Equatoria, 2 vols (London, 1890).Google Scholar
  24. T. Richards, The Commodity Culture of Victorian England: Advertising and Spectacle, 1851–1914 (Stanford, 1990).Google Scholar
  25. A. Coombes, Reinventing Africa: Museums, Material Culture, and Popular Imagination in Late Victorian and Edwardian England (New Haven, 1994), ch. 4.Google Scholar
  26. 29.
    F. Driver, Geography Militant: Cultures of Exploration and Empire (Oxford, 2000), p. 23.Google Scholar
  27. 30.
    W. Booth, In Darkest England and the Way Out (London, 1890), pp. 11–12, 156.Google Scholar
  28. 31.
    G. Sims, How the Poor Live, cited P. Keating, Into Unknown England, 1886–1913: Selections from the Social Explorers (Glasgow, 1976).Google Scholar
  29. H. Mayhew, London Labour and the London Poor, 4 vols (London, 1861), iii, p. 233. Stanley made similar observations: In Darkest Africa, ii, p. 79.Google Scholar
  30. 32.
    H. M. Hyndman, General Booth’s Book Refuted, (London, 1890) pp. 4, 11.Google Scholar
  31. P. Walker, ‘“I Live but not yet I for Christ Liveth in Me”: Men and Masculinity in the Salvation Army, 1865–1890’, in M. Roper and J. Tosh (eds) Manful Assertions: Masculinities in Britain since 1800 (London, 1991), pp. 92–112.Google Scholar
  32. 54.
    Cited in H. L. Malchow, Gentlemen Capitalists: the Social and Political World of the Victorian Businessman (London, 1991), p. 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 56.
    Driver, Geography Militant, pp. 131–8; H. Yule and H. M. Hyndman, Mr Henry Stanley and the Royal Geographical Society: Being the Record of a Protest (London, 1878); Saturday Review, 16 February 1878.Google Scholar
  34. 58.
    J. S. Keltie, ‘What Stanley has Done for the Map of Africa’, Contemporary Review 57 (January 1890), 130.Google Scholar
  35. 60.
    Sir W. Barttelot (ed.), The Life of Edmund Musgrave Barttelot from his Letters and Diaries (London, 1890).Google Scholar
  36. J. S. Jameson, Story of the Rear Column of the Emin Pasha Relief Expedition, Edited by Mrs J. S. Jameson (London, 1890).Google Scholar
  37. For other participants: A. J. Mounteney Jephson, Emin Pasha and Rebellion at the Equator (London, 1890).Google Scholar
  38. R. Troup, ‘Mr Stanley’s Rear-Guard’, Fortnightly Review 48, December (1890), 817–29.Google Scholar
  39. H. Ward, My Life with Stanley’s Rear-Guard (London, 1891).Google Scholar
  40. J. M. Konczacki (ed.), Victorian Explorer: the African Diaries of Captain William G. Stairs, 1887–92 (Halifax 1994).Google Scholar
  41. C. Peters, New Light on Dark Africa: Being the Narrative of the German Emin Pasha Expedition (London, 1891).Google Scholar
  42. For a brilliant satire: F. C. Burnand, A New Light Thrown Across (the Keep-it-Quiet) Darkest Africa (London, 1890).Google Scholar
  43. 61.
    Anon., ‘Stanley’s Expedition: a Retrospect’, Fortnightly Review, 47 (January 1890), 96. See also E. L. Godkin, ‘Was the Emin Expedition Piratical?’, Forum 10 (1890), 633–44.Google Scholar
  44. 62.
    H. R. Fox Bourne, The Other Side of the Emin Pasha Relief Expedition (London, 1891), pp. 195, 196, 200.Google Scholar
  45. 64.
    Evening News, 15 January 1890. George Bernard Shaw denounced Stanley: Captain Brassbound’s Conversion (London, 1899).Google Scholar
  46. 65.
    D. J. Nicoll, Stanley’s Exploits: or Civilising Africa (Aberdeen, 1891), pp. 3, 13, 21–2.Google Scholar
  47. 74.
    South London Press, 2 July 1892. For the controversies involving Bishop Colenso in the 1860s, see D. Lorimer, Colour, Class and the Victorians (Leicester, 1978).Google Scholar
  48. 76.
    Daily Chronicle, 30 June 1892 — a familiar theme in representations of Stanley; cf. Driver, Geography Militant, pp. 121, 127–31; cf. also J. Conrad, ‘Geography and Some Explorers’, National Geographic Magazine 45, March (1924), 237–74.Google Scholar
  49. 91.
    A. Hochschild, King Leopold’s Ghost: a Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa (Basingstoke, 1999).Google Scholar
  50. W. Samarin, The Black Man’s Burden: African Colonial Labour on the Congo and Ubangi Rivers (Boulder, 1989).Google Scholar
  51. 101.
    J. A. Spender, ‘The Patriotic Election — and After’, Contemporary Review, LXXVIII (November 1900), 752.Google Scholar
  52. P. Readman, ‘The Conservative Party, Patriotism, and British Politics: The Case of the General Election of 1900’, JBS, 40 (2001), 107–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 104.
    J. Davis, Reforming London: the London Government Problem, 1855–1900 (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
  54. A. Saint (ed.) Politics and the People of London (London, 1989), pp. 27–48.Google Scholar
  55. 105.
    J. A. Hobson, The Psychology of Imperialism (London, 1901).Google Scholar
  56. P. Cain, Hobson and Imperialism: Radicalism, New Liberalism and Finance (Oxford, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 107.
    C. Masterman, ‘Realities at Home’, in Masterman (ed.) Heart of Empire (London, 1901). See also idem, From the Abyss (London, 1902).Google Scholar
  58. 108.
    A. L. Lowell, The Government of England, 2 vols (New York, 1908), ii, p. 232.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Alex Windscheffel 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Windscheffel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations