Skip to main content

Textual Barriers to United States Immigration

  • Chapter
Book cover Language in the Legal Process

Abstract

The ideological project of keeping the USA free from illegal aliens is often captured in images of an actual physical border to be defended, asserting bounded, nationalist space. We see and read news accounts of the border patrol holding back the ‘flood’ of illegal immigrants from Latin America. Accounts of these Latin Americans trying to reach the USA — sometimes dying of heat or cold in the desert-like land of the south-western states or chased out by vigilante ranchers protecting their property — appear frequently in US newspapers and news magazines. If they are still alive when found, they are ‘processed’ back out of the country. Alternatively on both coasts, media reports warn of the dangers of attempting to enter the USA without formal application, when yet another container ship from East Asia filled with weakened, dying or dead bodies of illegal immigrants is discovered. They, too, are processed out as soon as they are physically able. The Coast Guard patrols the waters off the coast of Florida, too, keeping Haitians at bay. The Immigration and Naturalization Service maintains these images in their own in-house publication, occasionally publishing graphs and pie charts extolling their abilities to meet the quotas on ‘alien removal’ for the year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Essex. England: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins COBUILD English Dictionary (1995). London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P. (1987) ‘The Processing of Organizational Information in Written Directions’, Journal of Memory and Language, vol. 26, pp. 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, B. (2000) ‘US Pattern Jury Instructions: Problems and Proposals’, Forensic Linguistics, vol. 7 (1), pp. 49–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwork, A., Sales, B. D. and Alfini, J. J. (1982) Making Jury Instructions Understandable. Charlottesville, VA: Michie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuqua, R. W. and Phye, G. D. (1978) ‘The Effects of Physical Structure and Semantic Organization on the Recall of Prose’, Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 3, pp. 105–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, V. M., Kennedy, A. and Murray, W. S. (1987) ‘Syntactic Structure and the Garden Path’, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 39, pp. 277–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immigration and Naturalization Service, ‘State Population Estimates: Legal Permanent Residents and Aliens Eligible to Apply for Naturalization’ <http://www.ins.usdoj.gov/aboutins/statistics/lprest.htm>

  • Irwin, J. W. (1980) The Effects of Explicitness and Clause Order on the Comprehension of Reversible Causal Relations’, Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 14, pp. 477–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, W. and Burns, D. (1977) ‘Sentence Comprehension and Memory for Embedded Structure’, Memory and Cognition, vol. 5 (1), pp. 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loman, N. L. and Mayer, R. E. (1980) ‘Signaling Techniques that Increase the Readability of Expository Prose’, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 75 (3), pp. 402–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, A. and Chodorow, M. S. (1988) ‘Pronoun Ambiguity in Two-Clause Sentences: Effects of Ambiguity, Antecedent Location, and Depth of Embedding’, Journal of Memory and Language, vol. 27, pp. 245–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English Dictionary (1998). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips, S. U. (1985) ‘Strategies of Clarification in Judges’ Use of Language: From the Written to the Spoken’, Discourse Processes, vol. 8, pp. 421–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuy, R. W. (1998) Bureaucratic Language in Government and Business. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spryridakis, J. H. and Wenger, M. J. (1992) ‘Writing for Human Performance: Relating Reading Research to Document Design’, Technical Communication, vol. 39 (2), pp. 202–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyridakis, J. H. and Standal, T. C. (1987) ‘Signals in Expository Prose: Effects on Reading Comprehension’, Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 22 (3), pp. 285–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takacs, S. (1999) ‘Alien-Nation: Immigration, National Identity and Transnationalism’, Cultural Studies, vol. 13 (4), pp. 591–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiersma, P. M. (1999) Legal Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Cases cited

  • Davis v. United States, 114 S.Ct. 2350 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • El Rescate v. Executive Office of Immigration Review, 941 F.2d 950 (9th Cir. 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salameda v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 70 F.3d 447 (7th Cir. 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters v. Reno, 145 F.3d 1032 (9th Cir. 1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stygall, G. (2002). Textual Barriers to United States Immigration. In: Cotterill, J. (eds) Language in the Legal Process. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522770_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics