Abstract
When attorneys call on a linguist to help them with a criminal case, their first words are usually, ‘I need someone to testify’. To me, this signifies one of three things: the attorney has never used a linguist before, the case is so hopeless that desperation has already set in, or the attorney has actually become aware of the importance of linguistic analysis for a case.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
FBI Undercover Operations (1984) Report of the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, 98th Congress, second session. April, 1984. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Shuy, R. W. (1982a) ‘Topic as the Unit of Analysis in a Criminal Law Case’, in D. Tannen (ed.), Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 113–26.
Shuy, R. W. (1982b) ‘Entrapment and the Linguistic Analysis of Tapes’, Studies in Language, vol. 8 (2), pp. 215–34.
Shuy, R. W. (1993) Language Crimes. Oxford: Blackwell (reprinted in paperback, 1996 ).
Shuy, R. W. (1995) ‘Dialect as Evidence in Law Cases’, Journal of English Linguistics, vol. 23 (1/2), pp. 195–208.
Shuy, R. W. (1997) ‘Discourse Clues to Coded Language in an Impeachment Hearing’, in G. Guy, C. Feagin, D. Schiffrin and J. Baugh (eds), Towards a Social Science of Language: Papers in Honor of William Labov. Amsterdam: John Benjamin, pp. 121–38.
Solan, L. (1998) ‘Linguistic Experts as Semantic Tour Guides’, Forensic Linguistics, vol. 5 (2), pp. 87–106.
Tannen, D. (1993) Gender and Conversational Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wallace, W. D. (1986) ‘The Admissibility of Expert Testimony on the Discourse Analysis of Recorded Conversations’, University of Florida Law Review, vol. 38 (1), pp. 69–115.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shuy, R.W. (2002). To Testify or Not to Testify?. In: Cotterill, J. (eds) Language in the Legal Process. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522770_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522770_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-3388-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52277-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)