Advertisement

‘The Fascists … are … to be depended upon.’ The British Government, Fascists and Strike-breaking during 1925 and 1926

  • Richard Charles Maguire

Abstract

On 31 July 1925, or ‘Red Friday’ as it came to be known, Stanley Baldwin’s Conservative government intervened in an industrial dispute in the British coalfields, offering to provide an extremely costly subsidy to the coal industry while a Royal Commission examined its economic circumstances. This step averted a national lockout of miners by colliery owners, which would have led to widespread sympathetic industrial action by the members of other British trade unions. Nine months later the failure to find a mutually acceptable solution to the difficulties in the coal industry resulted in the General Strike. At the time, the Red Friday decision was fiercely attacked by many. Yet, the dominant interpretation of this action in recent years has been to see it in the context of what Philip Williamson calls Baldwin’s ‘appeal for industrial peace’: a final attempt at mediation in which, after ‘unsuccessful attempts during July 1925 to reconcile coal owners’ and miners’ leaders, and in the face of threatened strikes by transport unions in support of miners, he [Baldwin] took the large political risk of offering a temporary Government subsidy and a Royal Commission of Inquiry’.1 This reading of Red Friday sits comfortably with the dominant conception of British governance in this and other eras, which emphasises a culture of minimal force, consensus and dialogue.

Keywords

Trade Union Labour Movement Coal Industry Royal Commission Conservative Party 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    P. Williamson, Stanley Baldwin. Conservative Leadership and National Values (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 9, 35.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. C. Webber, The Ideology of the British Right 1918–1939 (London: Croom Helm, 1986), p. 4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Thurlow, Fascism in Britain: From Oswald Mosley’s Blackshirts to the National Front (London: I.B. Tauris, 1998), p. 31;Google Scholar
  4. Roger Griffin, ‘British Fascism: The Ugly Duckling’, in M. Cronin (ed.), The Failure of British Fascism. The Far Right and the Fight for Political Recognition (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996), p. 162; D. Baker, ‘The Extreme Right in the 1920’s: Fascism in a Cold Climate, or “Conservatism with Knobs on”?’, in Cronin, Failure, p. 22;Google Scholar
  5. Thomas Linehan, British Fascism, 1918–1939: Parties, Ideology and Culture (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000), p. 69.Google Scholar
  6. 4.
    K. Lunn, ‘The Ideology and Impact of the British Fascists in the 1920’s’, in T. Kushner and K. Lunn (eds), Traditions of Intolerance. Historical Perspectives on Fascism and Race Discourse in Britain (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1989), pp. 143–4;Google Scholar
  7. J. Hope, ‘British Fascism and the State 1917–1927: A Re-examination of the Documentary Evidence’, Labour History Review, 57, 3, 1992, pp. 72–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 5.
    R. Benewick, The Fascist Movement in Britain (London: Allen Lane, 1972), pp. 33–4.Google Scholar
  9. This incident is discussed in detail in N. Copsey Anti-Fascism in Britain (London: Macmillan, 2000), p. 11.Google Scholar
  10. 6.
    M. Morris, The General Strike (London: The Journeyman Press, 1980), pp. 161–2.Google Scholar
  11. 9.
    A. Mason, ‘The Government and the General Strike’, International Review of Social History, XIV, 1969, pp. 18–20;Google Scholar
  12. P. Renshaw, The General Strike (London: Eyre Methuen, 1975), p. 133.Google Scholar
  13. 10.
    B. Storm-Farr, The Development and Impact of Right Wing Politics in Britain 1903–1932 (New York: Garland, 1987), pp. 58–60; D. Baker, ‘Extreme’, p. 19.Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    David Cesarani has suggested Joynson-Hicks was hostile to Jews, see D. Cesarani, ‘The Anti-Jewish Career of Sir William Joynson-Hicks Cabinet Minister’, Journal of Contemporary History, 24, 1989, pp. 469–82. However, there is no evidence of this in his personal papers. Serious dissent with Cesarani’s suggestion may be found in W. D. Rubenstein, ‘Recent Anglo-Jewish Historiography and the Myth of Jix’s Anti-Semitism’, a two part article in Australian Journal of Jewish Studies, 7, 1, 1993, pp. 41–70 and 7, 2, 1993, pp. 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 19.
    R. McKibbin, The Ideologies of Class. Social Relations in Britain 1880–1950 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994), pp. 267–75.Google Scholar
  16. 37.
    ‘The Citizen and the General Strike. Extract from a Speech Delivered at a Meeting at Chippenham, 12 June 1926’, in Stanley Baldwin, Our Inheritance. Speeches and Addresses (London: Hodder, 1928), pp. 217–24.Google Scholar
  17. 47.
    K. Jeffery and P. Hennessey, States of Emergency. British Governments and Strikebreaking Since 1919 (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983), pp. 263–7.Google Scholar
  18. 51.
    PRO/HO/144/6116, Letter from Chief Constable of Glamorgan, 23 December 1925. Lindsay’s activities in this period and other disputes have been examined in some depth in J. Morgan, Conflict and Order — The Police and Labour Disputes in England and Wales, 1900–1939 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987), pp. 192–5.Google Scholar
  19. 54.
    D. Baker, ‘Extreme’, p. 23. Similarly, John Charmley describes ministerial belief in a Communist plot, and of others on ‘the other side’ that the Government wanted confrontation, as ‘equally barmy’. J. Charmley, Churchill the End of Glory. A Political Biography (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1993), p. 217.Google Scholar
  20. 57.
    S. Ball(ed.), Parliament and Politics in the Age of Baldwin and MacDonald. The Headlam Diaries, 1923–1935 (London: Historians’ Press, 1992), p. 70.Google Scholar
  21. 58.
    K. Middlemass (ed.), Thomas Jones Whitehall Diary Volume I (London: Oxford University Press, 1969), p. 325.Google Scholar
  22. 59.
    J. Morgan, Conflict, pp. 110–229. Charles Townshend, Making the Peace. Public Order and Public Security in Modern Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 97–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 65.
    PRO/HO/45/24860, Chief Constable of Birmingham to A. Dixon, 23 April 1926. Similarly, John Hope argues that it was the fascists’ claim to independence that was of concern to the Government, rather than their policies, J. Hope, ‘Fascism and the State in Britain: The Case of the British Fascist 1923–31’, Australian Journal of Politics and History, 39, Part 3, 1993, p. 369.Google Scholar
  24. 71.
    Joynson-Hicks remains an under-researched politician, with most attitudes to him still reflecting the vilification by Blythe in ‘The Salutary Tale of Jix’, in R. Blythe, The Age of Illusion. England in the Twenties and Thirties. 1919–1940 (London: Penguin, 1963), p. 31.Google Scholar
  25. 72.
    Keith Middlemass and John Barnes, Baldwin — A Biography (London, 1969), p. 283. Rubenstein argued that Joynson-Hicks ‘never left the British political mainstream’, Rubenstein ‘Recent Part II’, pp. 27–33. The Fascist Bulletin, 17 October 1925.Google Scholar
  26. 74.
    Matthew Hendley, ‘Women and the Nation: The Right and Projections of Feminised Political Images in Great Britain, 1900–18’, in J. V. Gottlieb and T. P. Linehan (eds), The Culture of Fascism. Visions of the Far Right in Britain (London: I.B. Tauris, 2004), pp. 13–14.Google Scholar
  27. 80.
    S. Baldwin ‘The Citizen and the General Strike. Extract from a speech delivered at a meeting at Chippenham, 12 June 1926’, in S. Baldwin, Our Inheritance. Speeches and Addresses (London: Hodder, 1928), p. 214.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Charles Maguire

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations