Scale, Scope and Entrepreneurship

  • George Bitros


When asked to define what is economics, quite frequently economists respond that economics is whatever economists do. In an analogous way, if one were asked to define what is entrepreneurship, one might reasonably be expected to respond that entrepreneurship is whatever entrepreneurs do. Hence, to understand entrepreneurship, a convenient approach is to focus on the role(s) of entrepreneurs in the economy.


Firm Size Large Firm Demand Curve Austrian Economic Innovative Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acs, Z.J. and Audretsch, D.B. (1987) ‘Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 69, pp. 567–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barreto, H. (1989) The Entrepreneur in Microeconomic Theory (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  3. Baumol, W.J. (1968) ‘Entrepreneurship in Economic Theory’, American Economic Review, vol. 58, pp. 64–71.Google Scholar
  4. Baumol, W.J. (1992) ‘Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, pp. 893–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumol, W.J. Panzar, J.C. and Willig, R.D. (1988) Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure, rev. edn (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich).Google Scholar
  6. Chandler, A.D. (1990) Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  7. Eliasson, G. (1984) ‘Micro Heterogeneity of Firms and the Stability of Industrial Growth’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 5, pp. 249–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eliasson, G. and Henrekson, M. (2003) William Baumol: An Entrepreneurial Economist on the Economics of Entrepreneurship, SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance No 532.Google Scholar
  9. Galbraith, J.K. (1956) American Capitalism, rev. edn (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar
  10. Kirzner, I.M. (1985) Discovery and the Capitalist Process (Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press).Google Scholar
  11. Kirzner, I.M. (1992) The Meaning of the Market Process: Essays in the Development of Modem Austrian Economics (London: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knight, F. (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (New York: Harper & Row, 1965).Google Scholar
  13. Link, A.N. (1980) ‘Firm Size and Efficient Entrepreneurial Activity: A Reformulation of the Schumpeterian Hypothesis’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 88, pp. 771–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Loasby, B.J. (1982) ‘Economics of Dispersed and Incomplete Information’, in I.M. Kirzner (ed.), Method, Process and Austrian Economics: Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises (Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath).Google Scholar
  15. Loasby, B.J. (1989) The Mind and Method of the Economist: A Critical Appraisal of Major Economists in the 20th Century (Aldershot: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  16. Machlup, F. (1958) ‘The Optimum Lag of Imitation Behind Innovation’, Festskrift til Frederik Zeuthen (Copenhagen: Nationalokonomisk Forening) pp. 239–46.Google Scholar
  17. Mahajan, V. and Wind, Y. (eds) (1986) Innovation Diffusion Models of New Product Acceptance (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger).Google Scholar
  18. Mansfield, E. (1963a) ‘The Speed of Response of Firms to New Techniques’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 77, pp. 290–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mansfield, E. (1963b) ‘Size of Firm, Market Structure, and Innovation’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 71, pp. 556–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mansfield, E. (1968) Industrial Research and Technological Innovation (New York: W.W. Norton).Google Scholar
  21. Mansfield, E. (1977) The Production and Application of New Industrial Technology (New York: W.W. Norton).Google Scholar
  22. Mansfield, E. (1996) Managerial Economics: Theory, Applications, and Cases (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.).Google Scholar
  23. Marshall, A. (1890) Principles of Economics (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  24. Nadiri, M.I. and Rosen, S. (1974) A Disequilibrium Model of Demand for Factors of Production (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research).Google Scholar
  25. Nelson R.R., Merton, J.P. and Kalachek, E.D. (1966) Technology, Economic Growth and Public Policy (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution).Google Scholar
  26. Phelps, E.S. et al (1970) Microeconomic Foundations of Employment and Inflation Theory (New York: W.W. Norton & Co., Inc.).Google Scholar
  27. Ricardo, D. (1821) The Principles of Political Economy (London: J.M. Dent, 3rd edn 1912).Google Scholar
  28. Scherer, F.M. (1980) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 2nd edn (Chicago, IL: Rand McNally).Google Scholar
  29. Schollhammer, H. (1982) ‘Internal Corporate Entrepreneurship’, in C. Kent, D. Sexton, and K. Vesper, (eds), Encyclopaedia of Entrepreneurship (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
  30. Schultz, T.W. (1975) ‘The Value of the Ability to Deal with Disequilibria’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 13, pp. 827–46.Google Scholar
  31. Schumpeter, J.A. (1950) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 3rd edn (New York: Harper & Row).Google Scholar
  32. Stonier, A.W. and Hague, D.C. (1953) A Textbook of Economic Theory (London: Longman).Google Scholar
  33. Vickrey, W.S. (1964) Microstatics (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© George Bitros 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Bitros

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations