Contagions of Love: Textual Transmission

  • Nancy Frelick

Abstract

Pathologizing love is not new to this age of modern psychology and self-help books. Indeed, much was written about ‘lovesickness’ as a serious medical condition in the early modern period and many cures were suggested for those afflicted with this potentially deadly disease, which is described not only as a physical illness, but also as a disorder of the mind or imagination that afflicts the soul.1 Yet, one of the most curious aspects of European lovesickness is that it is subtly fostered, if not promoted, by the very texts that decry and pathologize it. As Wack explains: The growing body of medical discourse on love made it possible for the literary representations of erotic passion to be interpreted mimetically or realistically, as reflections of real life. The cultural authority of medicine may have in part enabled the poetic fantasies of the troubadours to become the social realities of the late Middle Ages and early modernity.’2 The discourses providing descriptions of causes and cures for the disease can be said to be its transmitters, the vehicles through which it spread like wildfire across Europe throughout the early modern period, creating and fanning the flames of this contagion. The creation and sanctioning of love as a disease — through the ambivalent language of medical, philosophical, religious and literary discourses — thus makes it possible for individuals not only to identify with the discursive models but also to fashion themselves and their behaviours after texts and, ultimately, to shape new realities: life imitates art.

Keywords

Europe Hunt Refraction Nash Topo 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. M. F. Wack, Lovesickness in the Middle Ages: The Viaticum and its Commentaries (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990), p. 40.Google Scholar
  2. M. Ciavolella, La ‘Mallattia d’amore’ dall’Antiquità al Medievo (Rome: Bulzoni, 1976).Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    See M. F. Wack, ‘The Liber de heros morbo of Johannes Afflacius and Its Implications for Medieval Love Conventions’, Speculum, 62, 2 (1987) 324–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 11.
    R. Burton, The Anatomy of Melancholy, eds. N. K. Kiessling, T. C. Faulkner and R. L. Blair (Oxford: Clarendon, 1989–97).Google Scholar
  5. See the groundbreaking article by J. L. Lowes, ‘The Loveres Maladye of Hereos,’ Modem Philology, 11:4 (1914) 491–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Wack on ‘The Liber de heros morbo, and Beecher and Ciavolella’s edition of Ferrand’s treatise. Much of the research on the subject of amor hereos, spawned by Lowes’s findings, has centred on Chaucer’s use of the term. See C. F. Heffernan, The Melancholy Muse: Chaucer, Shakespeare and Early Medicine (Pittsburgh: Duquesnes University Press, 1995), Wack, etc. There also seems to be quite a bit of research on the topic in Spanish literature.Google Scholar
  7. R. Folger, Images in Mind: Lovesickness, Spanish Sentimental Fiction and Don Quijote (Chapel Hill: North Carolina Studies in the Romance Languages and Literatures, 2002), for example.Google Scholar
  8. 13.
    See R. Klibansky, E. Panofsky and F. Saxl, Saturn and Melancholy (New York: Nelson, 1964), pp. 16–17. Saturn and Melancholy contains a side-by-side translation of ‘Problem 30’. The notion that outstanding men are melancholic finds widespread artistic and literary expression, notably in Dürer, Erasmus, Ficino, Montaigne, Cervantes, Shakespeare and Burton; In addition to Klibansky et al., see L. Babb, The Elizabethan Malady: A Study of Melancholia in English Literature from 1580 to 1642 (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1951), W. Schleiner, Melancholy, Genius, and Utopia in the Renaissance (Weisbaden: Harrassowitz, 1991), M. A. Screech, ‘Good Madness in Christendom’, in Essays in the History of Psychiatry, vol. 1. ed. W. F. Bynum, R. Porter and M. Shepherd (London: Tavistock, 1985); idem, Montaigne and Melancholy: The Wisdom of the Essays (London: Penguin, 1991) and Heffernan, The Melancholy Muse, for example).Google Scholar
  9. 18.
    A. Easthope, Poetry and Phantasy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 73–5.Google Scholar
  10. 29.
    See M. Ciavolella, ‘Saturn and Venus’, Saturn from Antiquity to the Renaissance, ed. M. Ciavolella and A. A. Iannuci (Ottawa: Dovehouse, 1992), pp. 176–9, and introduction to Ferrand, A Treatise on Lovesickness, p. 81. See also Ciavolella’s ‘Eros and the Phantasms of Hereos’, and L. Bolzoni, ‘The Art of Memory and the Erotic image in 16th and 17th Century Europe: The Example of Giovan Battista Della Porta’, in Eros & Anteros, pp. 9–31 for a discussion of the relationship between the estimation, imagination and memory in various texts.Google Scholar
  11. 35.
    See M. J. Baker, ‘Rape, Attempted Rape, and Seduction in the Heptaméron, Romance Quarterly, 39, 3 (1992) 271–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. P. R. Cholakian, Rape and Writing in the HeptamÈron of Marguerite de Navarre (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
  13. 41.
    R. Girard, Mensonge romantique et vérité romanesque (Paris: Grasset, 1961). See Fournier’s contribution to this volume for more on ‘the novel as an agent of contagion’.Google Scholar
  14. 42.
    J. L. Vives, The Education of a Christian Woman: A Sixteenth-Century Manual, ed. C. Fantazzi (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 5.30. See Cazes’s contribution to this volume for more on odour.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 44.
    See Chartier’s Belle Dame sans mercy The Poetical Works of Alain Chartier, ed. J. C. Laidlaw (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
  16. 45.
    See B. Altmann The Love Debate Poems of Christine de Pizan (Gainseville: University Presses of Florida, 1998).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy Frelick

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations