Abstract
The word ‘contagion’ contains a buried metaphor pertaining to ‘touch’. But the notion has been generalized to express all manner of pathogenic transmission through proximity, and then generalized again to express moral contamination, imitative emotions or the psychology of crowds. Through such analogical applications, the history of contagion becomes even more extensive, one that relates not only to the best scientific and philosophical explanations from the ancients to the early moderns concerning the spread of diseases, but, by extension, to an analysis of the psychodynamics of groups. Given that microbiology belongs only to the last two centuries, earlier thinkers were challenged to account for contagion according to their ‘received’ philosophies of nature, or in terms of what they presumed to see and verify prior to an understanding of microorganisms. Consequently, they had no choice but to turn to the language of correspondences, occult and spiritual forces, environments and temperaments, poisons, vapours, stares and the polluting touch. But when these operations were applied to the transfer of passions and ideas it was no longer for a lack of understanding of the microbiological world, but of the emotional and cognitive mechanisms whereby minds copy passions and belief structures in seemingly spontaneous, subconscious and often destructive ways. These are socio-psychological phenomena merely resembling pathogenic operations; the relationship would appear to be one of pure metaphor.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Plutarch, The Philosophie commonlie called the Morals, trans. P. Holland (London: Arnold Hatfield, 1603).
E. Hatfield, J. Cacioppo and R. Rapson, Emotional Contagion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).
J. Ferrand, A Treatise on Lovesickness, ed. D. Beecher and M. Ciavolella (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1990), pp. 314, 326.
V. Nutton, ‘Did the Greeks Have a Word for it?’, in Contagion: Perspectives from Pre-Modern Societies, ed. L. Conrad and D. Wujastyk (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000), pp. 137 ff.
T. Lodge, A Treatise of the Plague (London: Edward White and N.L., 1603), n.p.
G. Boccaccio, The Decameron, trans. E. Hutton (New York: Heritage Press, 1940).
S. Jarcho, The Concept of Contagion in Medicine, Literature, and Religion (Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company, 2000), p. 56.
Middle English Literature, ed. A. Brandl and O Zippel (New York: Chelsea Publishing, 1965), pp. 156–8.
H. Klawans Newton’s Madness: Further Tales of Clinical Neurology (London: Headline Book Publishing, 1990), p. 237.
J. F. Hecker, The Dancing Mania of the Middle Ages, trans. B.G. Babington (1873; New York: Burt Franklin, 1970), pp. 1–2.
H. Kallin, Liberty, Laughter and Tears (De Kalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press, 1968), p. 50.
A. Paré, On Monsters and Marvels, trans. Janis Pallister (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).
W. I. Miller, The Anatomy of Disgust (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997), p. 151.
J. Starobinski, The Idea of Nostalgia’, Diogenes, 54 (1967) 81.
D. de Rougement, The Myths of Love, trans. R. Howard (London: Faber and Faber, 1964), p. 154.
S. Gosson, Playes Confuted in fìue Actions ([London:] n.d., 1582), sig. G4.
H. Kramer and J. Sprenger, Malleus maleficarum, trans. M. Summers (London: John Rodker, 1928).
M. Del Rio, Les controverses et recherches magiques, trans. A. du Chesne (Paris: Jean Petit-pas, 1611); Investigations into Magic, trans. and ed. P. G. Maxwell-Stuart (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000).
R. Dawkins, The Selfish Gene (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).
H. Plotkin, Darwin, Machines and the Nature of Knowledge (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).
D. Dennett, Consciousness Explained (Boston: Little, Brown, 1991).
R. Brodie, Virus of the Mind: The New Science of the Meme (Seattle: Integral Press, 1996), p. 33.
W. B. Ober, Boswell’s Clap and Other Essays (New York: Harper and Row, 1988).
J. Boswell, Boswell’s London Journal, 1762–1763, ed. F. Pottle (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950), p. 149.
J. Hill, Hypochondriasis: A Practical Treatise (1766), ed. G. S. Rousseau (Los Angeles: Clark Memorial Library, 1969), p. 7.
Molière, Le malade imaginaire, ed. R. P. L. Ledésert (London: George Harrap, 1969).
P. Dandrey, Le ‘Cas’ Argan: Molière et la maladie imaginaire (Paris: Klincksieck, 1993).
A. Du Laurens, A Discourse of the Preservation of the Sight; of Melancholike Diseases; of Rheumes, and of Old Age, trans. R. Surphlet (London: Felix Kingston for Ralph Lacson, 1599), 34v.
W. Shakespeare, Hamlet (New York: Signet, 1963), III.ii. 396–8.
M. Healy, ‘Anxious and Fatal Contacts: Taming the Contagious Touch’, in Sensible Flesh: On Touch in Early Modem Culture, ed. E. D. Harvey (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003), p. 23.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beecher, D. (2005). An Afterword on Contagion. In: Carlin, C.L. (eds) Imagining Contagion in Early Modern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522619_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522619_16
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51974-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52261-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)