Can Cuba Bridge the Gap?: IMF and World Bank Membership for Socialist Countries

  • Daniel P. Erikson

Abstract

Over the last two decades, a range of socialist and post-communist countries have become successfully integrated into the international financial system. This has occurred as the globalization of the world economy has increased the relevance of the international financial institutions (IFIs) in their intended role as key arbiters of economic policy, guardians of macro-economic stability, and leading resources for knowledge and technical advice on development issues. In particular, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank have attempted to stem financial crisis and assist in the economic transition of the post-communist countries of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Of course, the effectiveness of these efforts has been hotly debated, and the institutions have been criticized in recent years for failing to prevent, and perhaps exacerbating, financial breakdown in Asia, Latin America, and Russia. The decision to join the IMF and World Bank clearly is not an economic panacea for the challenges facing developing countries, yet this has not diluted the appeal of membership for most of the world’s nations. With 184 members and counting, the international financial institutions are among the most universal organizations in the world. Most socialist countries have already joined the IFIs, and it is likely that Cuba will follow their lead in the future.

Keywords

Europe Transportation Income Assure Expense 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Joseph Gold, Membership and Non-Membership in the International Monetary Fund (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 1974), 141.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Timothy King, ‘Requirements for Participation in the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank’, in Economic Reforms in Centrally Planned Economies and Their Impact on the Global Economy, ed. Josef M. Van Brabant, Journal of Development Planning, vol. 20 (1990): 286.Google Scholar
  3. 12.
    Anthony Rowley, ‘Compromising on a Gold Cache’, Far Eastern Economic Review, vol. 108 (April 1980): 85.Google Scholar
  4. 15.
    Devesh Kapur, John P. Lewis, and Richard Webb, The World Bank: Its First Half Century (Washington, DC: the Brookings Institution, 1997), 24.Google Scholar
  5. 25.
    World Bank, Assisting Russia’s Transition: an Unprecedented Challenge (Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2002), 6.Google Scholar
  6. 45.
    Frederick Z. Brown, ‘U.S.-Vietnam Normalization: Past, Present, Future’, in James W. Morley and Masashi Nishihara (eds), Vietnam Joins the World, (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1997), 204.Google Scholar
  7. 47.
    James Srodes, ‘An Enigma at the World Bank’, Far Eastern Economic Review, vol. 106 (November 1979): 82.Google Scholar
  8. 56.
    Julie Marie Bunck, ‘Marxism and the Market: Vietnam and Cuba in Transition’, Cubain Transition, vol. 6 (1996): 237.Google Scholar
  9. 58.
    World Bank and UNDP, Assessing Aid: What Works, What Doesn’t and Why (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), 106.Google Scholar
  10. 60.
    Charles E. Egan, ‘Cuba and Jordan Charge Creditor Countries Run World Bank’, New York Times, 26 September 1956.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Daniel P. Erikson 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel P. Erikson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations