Skip to main content

The Political Meanings of the Equal Opportunities Project

  • Chapter
The Changing Politics of Gender Equality in Britain
  • 88 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter critically explores the equal opportunities project in the context of an apparent decline in the salience of equal opportunities as a creative and purposive policy orientation. This context is shaped by challenges to the contemporary relevance of equality of opportunity, changes to political structures and practices, developments in the theoretical underpinnings of equal opportunities practice and public initiatives in relation to women and social justice. In order to understand both the current situation and the forces that will shape the future, the political meanings of the equal opportunities project are analysed first in terms of the strengths and weaknesses of modernist accounts of political reality, and second as a conflict between modernist and postmodernist approaches to politics. Given the prospects for the equal opportunities project, a generic approach to equality of opportunity is proposed as a means of responding to the erosion of equal opportunities as a political project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bacchi, C. (1996), The Politics of Affirmative Action, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. (1987), Arguing for Equality, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (1998), The Third Way: New Politics for the New Century, Fabian Pamphlet 588, London: Fabian Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahn, S. (ed.) (1995), The Affirmative Action Debate, New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, G. (1998), ‘Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and Politics in the Developing World’, Political Studies, Vol. 46: 36–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. (1992), The Equal Opportunities Handbook, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshtain, J. B. (1992), ‘The Power and Powerless of Women’, in G. Bock and S. James (eds) Beyond Equality and Difference, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, T. (1995), ‘Seeming Contradictions: Parliamentary and Extra-Parliamentary Politics of Opposition’, in J. Lovenduski and J. Stanyer (eds), Contemporary Political Studies, vol. 2, Belfast: Political Studies Association of the UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1992), Modernity and Self Identity, Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. E. and Klingemann, H-D. (1996), A New Handbook of Political Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1984), Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center, Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewson, N. and Mason, D. (1986), ‘The Theory and Practice of Equal Opportunities Policies: Liberal and Radical Approaches’, Sociological Review, Vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J-F. (1979), The Postmodern Condition, translated by G. Bennington and B. Massumi (1984), Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migdal, J. (1988), Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in Third World Countries, Princeton; NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithaug, D. (1996), Equal Opportunity Theory, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (1994), ‘Political Blackness and British Asians’, Sociology, Vol. 28, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanton, P. (1995), ‘Extending the Boundaries: Equal Opportunities as Social Regulation’, Policy and Politics, Vol. 23, No. 2. pp. 203–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. and Wright, V. (1996), ‘Public Policy Administration, Old and New’, in R. E. Goodin and H-D. Klingemann (eds), A New Handbook of Political Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J. (1998), Equality of Opportunity, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaar, J. (1967), ‘Equality of Opportunity, and Beyond’, in J. Chapman and R. Pennock (eds), Nomos Six: Equality, New York: Atherton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, A. (1998), ‘Can We Live Together, Equal and Different?’, European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 176–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1970), ‘Bureaucracy’, in H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills (eds), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2002 Ian Forbes

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Forbes, I. (2002). The Political Meanings of the Equal Opportunities Project. In: Breitenbach, E., Brown, A., Mackay, F., Webb, J. (eds) The Changing Politics of Gender Equality in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522572_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics