Advertisement

Asylum Seekers as Pariahs in the Australian State

  • Claudia Tazreiter
Part of the Studies in Development Economics and Policy book series (SDEP)

Abstract

The year 2001 marked the fiftieth anniversary of the United Nations Refugee Convention (hereafter the Refugee Convention), which articulates most directly the grounds for protection that should be offered to those fleeing persecution. The majority of countries in the world do have substantive obligations to people who claim to be refugees, as signatories to the Refugee Convention and its Protocol of 1967. In the fifty-year period since the establishment of the Refugee Convention, the idea of (some) rights being universal, thereby applicable to all of humanity rather than the members of a particular state, has been given political efficacy through the vehicle of human rights. Rights, such as those embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948, privilege no particular concept of human life, or of cultural traits, beliefs or practices. The consolidation of human rights gathered momentum in the later half of the twentieth century through the proliferation of human rights institutions and the efficacy of the idea that protecting such rights is of intrinsic value across and between cultures and nations.

Keywords

Asylum Seeker Australian Government Federal Election Detention Centre Immigration Detention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Australian National Audit Office (2004). Management of the Detention Centre Contracts, Auditor General Report No. 54, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  2. Bade, K. J. (2000). Europa in Bewegung. Migration vom späten 18. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegewart, Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
  3. Caloz-Tschopp, M. C. (1997). ‘On the Detention of Aliens: The Impact on Democratic Rights’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 10(2): 165–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castles, S. (1996). ‘Immigration and Multiculturalism in Australia’, in K. J. Bade, Migration, Ethnizität, Konflikt: Systemfragen und Fallstudien. Osnabruck: Universitätsverlag Rasch: 251–72.Google Scholar
  5. Crock, M. and B. Saul (2002). Future Seekers. Refugees and the Law in Australia, Annandale NSW: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
  6. DIMIA (Department of Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs) (1997). Refugee and Humanitarian Issues: Australia’s Response Belconnen ACT, October.Google Scholar
  7. Freeman, G. P. and J. Jupp (1992). Nations of Immigrants. Australia, the United States, and International Migration, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hathaway, J. (1997). Reconceiving International Refugee Law, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  9. Hollifield, J. F. (2000). ‘The Politics of International Migration. How Can We “Bring the State Back In”?’, in C. B. Brettell and J. F. Hollifield (eds), Migration Theory. Talking Across Disciplines, New York: Routledge: 137–86.Google Scholar
  10. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1998). Those Who’ve Come Across the Seas: Detention of Unauthorised Arrivals, Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  11. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (2004). A Last Resort? National Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention, Sydney: HREOC.Google Scholar
  12. Ignatieff, M. (1984). The Needs of Strangers, London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  13. Ignatieff, M. (1999). ‘Human Rights’, in C. Hesse and R. Post (eds), Human Rights in Political Transitions: Gettysburg to Bosnia, New York: Zone Books: 313–24.Google Scholar
  14. Ignatieff, M. (2001). Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry, ed. and intro. by A. Gutman, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Joppke, C. (1998). ‘Why Liberal States Accept Unwanted Immigration’, World Politics, 50(2): 266–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kingston, M. (1993). ‘Politics and Public Opinion’, in M. Crock (ed.), Protection or Punishment. The Detention of Asylum Seekers in Australia, Sydney: The Federation Press: 8–14.Google Scholar
  17. MacCallum, M. (2002). ‘Girt by Sea. Australia, the Refugees and the Politics of Fear’, Quarterly Essay, 5: 1–73.Google Scholar
  18. Mares, P. (2001). Borderline. Australia’s Treatment of Refugees and Asylum Seekers, Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mediansky, F. (1998). ‘Detention of Asylum Seekers: The Australian Perspective’, in J. Hughes and F. Liebaut (eds), Detention of Asylum Seekers in Europe: Analysis and Perspectives, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff: 125–39.Google Scholar
  20. Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking Multiculturalism. Cultural Diversity and Political Theory, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  21. Rundle, G. (2001). ‘The Opportunist. John Howard and the Triumph of Reaction’, Quarterly Essay, 3: 1–65.Google Scholar
  22. Silove, D. and Z. Steel (1998). The Mental Health and Well-Being of On-Shore Asylum Seekers in Australia, Sydney: Psychiatry and Teaching Unit, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
  23. Silove, D., Z. Steel and C. Watters (1993). ‘Retraumatisation of Asylum-Seekers’, Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  24. Silove, D., Z. Steel and C. Watters (2000). ‘Policies of Deterrence and the Mental Health of Asylum Seekers’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(5): 604–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Taylor, S. (2000). ‘Should Unauthorised Arrivals in Australia Have Free Access to Advice and Assistance?’, Australian Journal of Human Rights, 6(1): 34–58.Google Scholar
  26. Tazreiter, C. (2002). ‘History, Memory and the Stranger in the Practice of Detention in Australia’, Journal of Australian Studies, 72: 3–12.Google Scholar
  27. Tazreiter, C. (2004). Asylum Seekers and the State. The Politics of Protection in a Security- Conscious World, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  28. UNHCR (2000). The State of the World’s Refugees. Fifty Years of Humanitarian Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. UNHCR (2002). ‘Trends in Asylum Applications in Europe, North America, Australia, New Zealand and Japan’ (January–June 2002), Population Data Unit/PGDS Geneva, 7 August. Available at http://www.unhcr.ch.Google Scholar
  30. Viviani, N. (1996). ‘The Indochinese in Australia, 1975–1995: From Burnt Boats to Barbecues’, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Weller, P. (2002). Don’t Tell the Prime Minister, Melbourne: Scribe Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Zolberg, A. R. (1999). ‘Matters of State: Theorizing Immigration Policy’, in D. Massey (ed.), Becoming American, American Becoming, New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© United Nations University — World Institute for Development Economics Research 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudia Tazreiter

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations