Opposition from Strength: 1892–1895

  • David Steele

Abstract

The note of class conflict that Gladstone sounded in the 1886 election, while maintaining that his motive was to remove a cause of social division, recurs in his continuing exhortations to his party and the public. He contended that the outcome of the election - a Tory and Liberal Unionist majority of 116 — concealed the magnitude of the support that Home Rule commanded in the British electorate. The disarray into which his party had been thrown by splitting only weeks before the poll sent the number of uncontested seats up to more than 150, excluding Ireland, compared with 22 in 1885; of these, 118 returned opponents of Home Rule. Yet in those that saw a fight the aggregate Unionist vote exceeded that of the Gladstonians by a mere 76,000.2 The moral victory, the ‘Grand Old Man’ proceeded to argue, lay with him. An analysis of the voting by class demonstrated, to his satisfaction, that 95 per cent of Liberal working-class electors in Britain had opted for Home Rule against 20 per cent of Liberals defined as ‘employers, or [those] who are socially in a position to draw with them the votes of others’. ‘Independent working men’, he implied, were likely to be Liberals; by them he meant those whose skills and wages raised them above their fellows, the ‘labour aristocracy’ of Marx and the historians.

Keywords

Depression Europe Assure Hull Defend 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    W.E. Gladstone, The Irish Question (London: John Murray, 1886), 27.Google Scholar
  2. See also W.C. Lubenow, Parliamentary Politics and the Home Rule Crisis. The British House of Commons in 1886 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988), ch. 7. Gladstone omitted the electors in uncontested seats from his calculations, The Times, 31 July 1886.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    RW. Hirst, ‘Mr Gladstone and Home Rule’, in W. Reid (ed.), The Life of William Ewart Gladstone (London: Cassell and Co., 1899), 722.Google Scholar
  4. H. Pelling, Social Geography of British Elections 1885–1910, (Aldershot: Gregg Revivals, 1994), 415.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    E.D. Steele, ‘Gladstone and Ireland’, Irish Historical Studies, 17, no. 65 (1970), 59.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    M.R.D. Foot and H.C.G. Matthew (eds), The Gladstone Diaries with Cabinet Minutes and Prime Ministerial Correspondence (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 14 vols, 1968–94), vol. 12, xlvii; afterwards cited as Gladstone Diaries.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    D. Steele, Lord Salisbury. A Political Biography (London: UCL Press, 1999), 275.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    Stephen Gwynn, The Letters and Friendships of Sir Cecil Spring-Rice. A Record (London: Constable and Co., 1929), 98–9.Google Scholar
  9. 19.
    Harcourt to Lord Rosebery, 4 Apr. 1894, in A.G. Gardiner, The Life of Sir William Harcourt (London: Constable and Co., 2 vols, 1933), vol. 2, 283–7.Google Scholar
  10. 21.
    P. Marsh, Joseph Chamberlain: Entrepreneur in Politics (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1994), 344.Google Scholar
  11. 22.
    R. Harcourt Williams, Salisbury-Balfour Correspondence. Letters exchanged between the Third Marquess of Salisbury and his nephew, Arthur James Balfour 1869–1892 (Ware: Hertfordshire Record Society, 1988), 430.Google Scholar
  12. 31.
    E.H.H. Green, The Crisis of Conservatism. The Politics, Economics and Ideology of the British Conservative Party, 1880–1914 (London and New York: Routledge, 1996), 130.Google Scholar
  13. E.D. Steele, ‘Leeds and Victorian Politics’, University of Leeds Review, 17, no. 20 (1974), 281.Google Scholar
  14. 44.
    J. Harris, Private Lives, Public Spirit. Britain 1870–1914 (London: Penguin Books, 1993), 158–9.Google Scholar
  15. 46.
    D. Steele, ‘Gladstone and Palmerston, 1855–1865’, in P.J. Jagger (ed.), Gladstone, Politics and Religion (London: Macmillan, 1985).Google Scholar
  16. 47.
    Lady Gwendolen Cecil, ‘Lord Salisbury in Private Life’, in Lord Blake and H. Cecil (eds), Salisbury. The Man and his Policies (London: Macmillan, 1987).Google Scholar
  17. 50.
    P.M.H. Bell, Disestablishment in Ireland and Wales (London: SPCK for the Church Historical Society, 1969).Google Scholar
  18. 51.
    The Queen’s journal, 10 Mar. 1894, in G.E. Buckle (ed.), The Letters of Queen Victoria (London: John Murray, 2nd ser., 3 vols, 1930–02), vol. 2, 380.Google Scholar
  19. 56.
    D.A. Hamer, John Morley: Liberal Intellectual in Politics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968), 294.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© David Steele 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Steele

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations