Knowledge, Progression and the Understanding of Workplace Learning

  • Erik Laursen


For at least the past fifteen years at least there has been a growing and largely positive interest for topics such as organizational learning (OL) and workplace learning (WPL) in the economically most advanced parts of the world — including Scandinavia. This interest has been an important part of a broader complex of themes, topics, ideas and collective representations concerning knowledge, information, learning, information technology (IT) and even globalization.


Behavioural Change Organizational Learning Lifelong Learn Workplace Learn Semantic Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrahamsson, K., Abrahamsson, L., & Johansson, J. (2003). From over-education to under-learning: Qualification structures, changing job skill requirements and work place learning. In Work and Lifelong Learning in Different Contexts. Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
  2. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. Bateson, G. (1936[1958]). Naven. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bateson, G. (1973). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. London: Paladin.Google Scholar
  5. Baumard, P. (1999). Tacit knowledge in organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  7. Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, Codes and Control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackler, F., Crump, N., & McDonald, S. (1999). Organizational Learning and Organizational Forgetting: Lessons from a High Technology Company. In M. Easterby-Smith, L. Araujo & J. Burgoyne (eds), Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization. Developments in Theory and Practice (pp. 194–216). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boud, D. (1998). Enhancing learning through Self Assessment. In P. Jarvis (ed.), The Theory and Practice of Learning. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1977). Reproduction. In Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Dahl, P., Jørgensen, K. M., Laursen, E., Rasmussen, J., & Rasmussen, P. (2001). Perspektiver på organisatorisk læring. [Perspectives on Organizational Learning]. Aalborg: Videncenter for Læreprocesser, Aalborg Universitet. VCL-serien, 2001, nr. 28.Google Scholar
  12. Dixon, N. (1994). The Organizational Learning Cycle. How we can learn collectively. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Durkheim, E. (1915[1968]). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  14. Elkjaer, B. (1999). In search of a Social Learning Theory. In Easterby-Smith etal. (eds), Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Ellström, P.-E. (1992). Kompetens, lärande och utbildning i arbetslivet: Problem, begrepp och teoretiska perspektiv. [Competence, learning and work-based education: Problems, concepts and theoretical perspectives]. Stockholm: Publica.Google Scholar
  16. Ellström, P.-E. (2002). Time and the Logics of Learning. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 2, 86–93.Google Scholar
  17. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to development research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
  18. Engeström, Y. (2003). New Forms of Learning in Co-configuration Work. In Work and Lifelong Learning in Different Contexts. Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
  19. Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational Learning. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803–13.Google Scholar
  20. Gibbons, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  23. Glasersfeld, E. von (1995). Radical Constructivism. A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  25. Hedberg, B. (1981). How Organizations Learn and Unlearn. In P. Nystrom & W. Starbuck (eds), Handbook of Organizational Design. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hildebrandt, S., & Brandi, S. (1998). Lœrende organisationer — erfaringer fra danske virksomheder. [Learning Organizations — Experiences from Danish Companies]. København: Børsen.Google Scholar
  27. Künzli, R. (1998). The Common Frame and the Places of Didaktik. In B. B. Gunden & S. Hopmann (eds), Didaktik and/or Curriculum: an international dialogue (pp. 29–43). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  28. Laursen, E. (2000). Billeder af læring — og udvikling af læringsadfærd i organisationer. [Representations of Learning — and the development of Learning Practices in Organizations]. In A. Christensen (ed.), Det lœrende perspektiv. [The Learning Perspective]. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  29. Laursen, E. (2005): Kan man lære af artige historier? [Is it possible to learn from polite stories?]. In K. M. Jørgensen & P. Rasmussen (eds). Lœring i organisatoriske forandringsprojekter [Learning in projects of organisational development]. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  30. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Layder, D. (1997). Modern Social Theory. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  32. Leadbetter, C. (1998). Welcome to the Knowledge Economy. In I. Hargreaves & I. Christie (eds), Tomorrow’s Politics. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  33. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Pedler, M., Burgoyne, J., & Boydell, T. (1991). The Learning Company. New York: MacGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  35. Piaget, J. (1937[1954]). The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  36. Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  37. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1998). Individual and Social Aspects of Learning. In P. David Pearson & Ali Iran-Nejad (eds), Review of Research in Education, 23, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  38. Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  39. Shrivastava, P. (1983). A typology of organizational learning systems. Journal of Management Studies, 20(2), 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van Hauen, F., et al. (1995). Den lœrende organisation. [The Learning Organization]. København: Industriens Forlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Erik Laursen 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Laursen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations