Advertisement

A Context of Learning in the Workplace

  • Hanne Dauer Keller

Abstract

It seems to be generally acknowledged that the efficiency of knowledge-based organizations depends upon a continuous development of the competence of the employees. In social work too, the continuous development of competence is crucial. The general conditions on which social workers try to provide help to the citizens are marked by frequent changes of laws and regulations. In addition to this instability, social workers’ expertise is often exposed to criticism from several sides. Furthermore, it can be demonstrated that — whatever the reasons might be — many clients do not benefit from the help provided by the social system and mediated through the interpretations and actions of the social workers. The continuous change of tasks and work conditions together with the recurrent criticism of social workers’ professionalism point to a general need for development of competence in social work.

Keywords

Social Worker Staff Member Social Practice Work Organization Sense Making 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Argyris, C. (1990). Overcoming organizational defences. Facilitating Organizational Learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  2. Berg Sørensen, T. (1995): Den sociale samtale — mellem klienter og sagsbehandlere. [The social dialogue — between clients and social workers]. Aarhus: Gestus.Google Scholar
  3. Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1999). Mesterlære og eksperters læring. [Apprenticeship learning and experts’ learning]. In K. Nielsen & S. Kvale (eds), Mesterlœre — læring som social praksis. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  4. Habermas, J. (1997). Teorien om den kommunikative handlen. [The theory of communicative action]. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  5. Heilund, P. (2000). Socialretsfilosofi — retslœre for socialt arbejde. [Philosophy of social law — jurisprudence for social work]. København: Nordisk Forlag.Google Scholar
  6. Jensen, I., & Prahl, A. (2000). Kompetence som intersubjektivt fænomen. [Competence as an inter-subjective phenomenon]. In T. Andersen, I. Jensen & A. Prahl (eds), Kompetence — i et organisatorisk perspektiv. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  7. Keller, H. D. (2003). Lœring i arbejdslivet. — Om kompetenceudvikling i socialt arbejde. [Learning in working life. — On competence development in social work]. Institut for Læring, Aalborg Universitet.Google Scholar
  8. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (1990). Informal and Incidental Learning in the Workplace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Nielsen, K., & Kvale, S. (1999). Mesterlœre — lœring som social praksis. [Apprenticeship learning — learning as social practice]. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  11. Sandberg, J. (1994). Human competence at work. Göteborg: BAS, Göteborg University.Google Scholar
  12. Schein, E. H. (1999). Process consultation revisited — building the helping relationship. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  13. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner — how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Schütz, A. (1975). Hverdagslivets sociologi. [The sociology of everyday life]. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  15. Wacherhausen, S. (1991). Teknologi, kompetence og vidensformer. [Technology, competence and forms of knowledge]. Philosophia, 20(3/4), pp. 81–117.Google Scholar
  16. Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
  17. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hanne Dauer Keller 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanne Dauer Keller

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations