Learning in and for Work, and the Joint Construction of Mediational Artefacts: An Activity Theoretical View

  • Reijo Miettinen
  • Jaakko Virkkunen

Abstract

During the past two decades, learning in and for work has been conceptualized in terms of ‘organizational learning’ (Argyris & Schön, 1978), ‘knowledge management’ (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995) and participation in ‘communities of practice’ (Lave & Wenger, 1991). All of these conceptions suggest that learning is a collective phenomenon, implying that cultural knowledge is somehow locally preserved, shared and transmitted to newcomers. Different explanations have been proposed for how learning results are actually preserved and further transmitted. In this chapter, we discuss three of the main theoretical explanations: the deposit of mental schemes in the mind, embodied skills, and the objectification of knowledge into artefacts.

Keywords

Metaphor Glean 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aboufalia, M. A. (1999). A (neo) American in Paris: Bordieu, and Pragmatism. In R. Shusterman (ed.), Bordieu. A Critical Reader (pp. 153–74). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning. A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  4. Bartunek, J., & Moch, M. K. (1987). First-Order, Second-Order, and Third-Order and Organization Development Interventions: Cognitive Approach. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 23(4), 483–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohman, D. (1999). Practical reason and cultural constraint. Agency in Bordieu’s theory of practice. In R. Shusterman (ed.), Bordieu. A Critical Reader (pp. 129–52). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burkitt, I. (1999). Bodies of Thought. Embodiment, Identity & Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, J. (1999). Peformativity’s Social Magic. In R. Shusterman (ed.), Bordieu. A Critical Reader (pp. 113–28). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, A. (2002). Minds, Brains and Tools. In H. Clapin (ed.), Philosophy of Mental Representations (pp. 66–93). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Crossley, N. (2001). The Social Body. Habit, Identity and Desire. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Dennet, D. (2000). Making Tools for Thinking. In D. Sperber (ed.), Metapresentations: A Multidisciolary Perspective (pp. 17–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. (1991[1938]). Logic. The Theory of Enquiry. In J. A. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, Vol. 12. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Donald, M. (2001). The Mind so Rare. The Evolution of Human Consciousness. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  14. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What Is Agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodwin, C. (1994). Seeing in Depth: Space, Technology and Interaction in a Scientific Research Vessel. Social Studies of Science, 25, 237–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  17. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ilyenkov, E. V. (1977). Dialectical Logic. Essays on Its History and Theory. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Joas, H. (1996). The Creativity of Action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning. Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy of Flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  23. Latour, B. (1992). Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artefacts. In W. Bijker & J. Law (eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change (pp. 225–64). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Latour, B (1994). On Technical Mediation. Philosophy, Sociology, Genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3, 29–64.Google Scholar
  25. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lektorsky, V. A. (1980). Subject Object Cognition. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational Learning. Annual Review of Sociology, (14), 319–340.Google Scholar
  28. Marx, K. (1964). The Economic & Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1958). Phenomenology of Perception. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  31. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. New York. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. How Professional Think In Action. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
  33. Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins ofHuman Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Virkkunen, J. (1995). Työpaikkatarkastuksen ristiriidat ja niiden ylittämisen mahdollisuudet. [The Contradictions of the Labour Inspection Work and the Prospects of Overcoming Them]. Työministeriö. Työpoliittinen tutkimus nr. 123. Helsinki: Hakapaino.Google Scholar
  35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Wartofsky, M. (1979). Models: Representation and Scientific Understanding. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Reijo Miettinen and Jaakko Virkkunen 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reijo Miettinen
  • Jaakko Virkkunen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations