Advertisement

Expectations and the Effects of Money Illusion

  • Ernst Fehr
  • Jean-Robert Tyran
Part of the International Economic Association Series book series (IEA)

Abstract

While the debate on how economic agents form expectations and how these expectations should be modelled has been key to modern macroeconomics, money illusion has been an anathema to macroeconomists until recently. The rational expectations revolution in the 1970s thoroughly banned the study of money illusion from economists’ research agendas. Rational individuals do not exhibit illusions and because, by assumption, people behave rationally, there is nothing to study. Money illusion was a concept to be mentioned in courses on the history of economic thought but not a part of actual research endeavours. In fact, a reliable method for getting leading journals to reject theory papers was to propagate that money illusion affected individual behaviour.

Keywords

Rational Expectation Average Price Price Expectation Monetary Shock Strategic Substitute 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adam, K. (2003) Optimal Monetary Policy with Imperfect Common Knowledge, Working Paper no. 2003/12, Center for Financial Studies, University of Frankfurt, April.Google Scholar
  2. Akerlof, G.A., W.T. Dickens and G.L. Perry (1996) ‘The Macroeconomics of Low Inflation’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 1, pp. 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow, K.J. (1987) ‘Rationality of Self and Others in an Economic System’, in R.M. Hogarth and M.W. Reder (eds), Rational Choice: The Contrast between Economics and Psychology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 201–15.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, L., N.G. Mankiw and R. Reis (2003) Monetary Policy for Inattentive Economies. NBER Working Paper no. 9491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belongia, M.T. (1996) ‘Measurement Matters: Recent Results from Monetary Economics Reexamined’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 104(5), pp. 1065–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blinder, A.S., E.D. Canetti, D.E. Lebow and J.B. Rudd (1998) Asking About Prices. A New Approach to Understanding Price Stickiness (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).Google Scholar
  7. Camerer, C.F. (2003) Behavioral Game Theory (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  8. Conlisk, J. (1996) ‘Why Bounded Rationality?’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 34(2), pp. 669–700.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, R.W. (1999) Coordination Games: Complementarities and Macroeconomics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, R.W. and J. Haltiwanger (1996) ‘Evidence on Macroeconomic Complementarities’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 78(1), pp. 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, R.W. and A. John (1988) ‘Coordinating Coordination Failures in Keynesian Models’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 103(3), pp. 441–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cover, J.P. (1992) ‘Asymmetric Effects of Positive and Negative Money-Supply Shocks’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 107(4), pp. 1261–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duffy, J. (1998) ‘Monetary Theory in the Laboratory’, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Sept./Oct., pp. 9–26.Google Scholar
  14. Fehr, E. and J.-R. Tyran (2001) ‘Does Money Illusion Matter?’, American Economic Review, vol. 91(5), pp. 1239–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fehr, E. and J.-R. Tyran (2002) Limited Rationality and Strategic Interaction. The Impact of the Strategic Environment on Nominal Inertia, Working Paper no. 2002–25, Department of Economics, University of St Gallen, November.Google Scholar
  16. Fehr, E. and J.-R. Tyran (2004) Money Illusion and Coordination Failure, CESifo Working Paper no. 1141, University of St Gallen, February.Google Scholar
  17. Fischer, S. (1977) ‘Long-Term Contracts, Rational Expectations, and the Optimal Money Supply Rule’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 85(1), pp. 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fisher, I. (1928) The Money Illusion (Toronto: Longmans).Google Scholar
  19. Friedman, M. (1968) ‘The Role of Monetary Policy’, American Economic Review, vol. 58(1), pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  20. Haltiwanger, J.C. and M. Waldman (1985) ‘Rational Expectations and the Limits of Rationality: An Analysis of Heterogeneity’, American Economic Review, vol. 75(3), pp. 326–40.Google Scholar
  21. Haltiwanger, J.C. and M. Waldman (1989) ‘Rational Expectations and Strategic Complements: The Implications for Macroeconomics’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 104(3), pp. 463–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Howitt, P. (1989) ‘Money Illusion’, in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman (eds), Money (New York and London: W.W. Norton), pp. 244–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hume, D. (1752) ‘Of Money; Of Interest’, reprinted in E. Rotwein (ed.) (1970), Writings on Economics (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).Google Scholar
  24. Kahn, S. (1997) ‘Evidence of Nominal Wage Stickiness’, American Economic Review, vol. 88(5), pp. 993–1008.Google Scholar
  25. Lucas, R.E. Jr (1972) ‘Expectations and the Neutrality of Money’, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 4(2), pp. 103–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mankiw, N.G. (1985) ‘Small Menu Costs and Large Business Cycles: A Macroeconomic Model of Monopoly’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 100(2), pp. 529–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mankiw, N.G. and R. Reis (2002) ‘Sticky Information versus Sticky Prices: A Proposal to Replace the New Keynesian Phillips Curve’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 117(4), pp. 1295–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Motolese, M. (2003) ‘Endogenous Uncertainty and the Non-Neutrality of Money’, Economic Theory, vol. 21, pp. 317–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Muth, J.F. (1961) ‘Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements’, Econometrica, vol. 29(3), pp. 315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peltzman, S. (2000) ‘Prices Rise Faster than They Fall’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 108(3), pp. 466–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shafir, E., P.A. Diamond and A. Tversky (1997) ‘On Money Illusion’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 112(2), pp. 341–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sims, C.A. (2003) ‘Implications of Rational Inattention’, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 50, pp. 665–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taylor, J.B. (1979) ‘Staggered Wage Setting in a Macro Model’, American Economic Review, vol. 69(2), pp. 108–13.Google Scholar
  34. Tobin, J. (1972) ‘Inflation and Unemployment’, American Economic Review, vol. 62(1), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  35. Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1981) ‘The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice’, Science, vol. 211, pp. 453–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1986) ‘Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions’, Journal of Business, vol. 49(4), pp. 251–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Woodford, M. (2003) ‘Imperfect Common Knowledge and the Effects of Monetary Policy’, in P. Aghion, R. Frydman, J. Stglitz and M. Woodford (eds), Knowledge, Information and Expectations in Modem Macroeconomics: Essays in the Honor of Edmund S. Phelps (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Economic Association 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ernst Fehr
    • 1
  • Jean-Robert Tyran
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Empirical Research in EconomicsUniversity of ZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Institute of EconomicsUniversity of CopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations