Altruism: Evolution and a Repercussion

  • Oded Stark
  • You Qiang Wang
  • Yong Wang
Part of the International Economic Association Series book series (IEA)

Abstract

Evolutionary biologists have developed a powerful theory of the evolutionary foundations of altruism between relatives. The theory is based on the idea that individuals who are related by blood share genes. Consider a gene that governs a particular behaviour. The likelihood that the gene will be replicated is higher when the gene takes into account not only the extra reproductive opportunities that the behaviour confers on the host who carries the gene, but also the extra reproductive opportunities that the behaviour confers on relatives of the host who also carry the gene. William Hamilton, the pioneer of this theory, describes it as follows:

The social behaviour of a species evolves in such a way that in each distinct behavior-evoking situation the individual will seem to value his neighbor’s fitness against his own according to the coefficients of relationship appropriate to that situation. (Hamilton, 1964: 19)

The coefficient of relationship between to individuals is the probability that a randomly selected gene in one of these individuals will have an exact copy located in the other individual as a result of descent from a common ancestor. In the case of a haploid population in which each parent has a single gene for being altruistic or selfish and matting is monogamous, the coefficient of relationship between to siblings is ½. ‘Hamiltons’s rule’ is that altruism will spread in a population if the benefit obtained from giving multiplied by the coefficient of relationship exceeds the cost of giving.

Keywords

Income Payback 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  2. Bergstrom, T.C. (1995) ‘On the Evolution of Altruistic Ethical Rules for Siblings’, American Economic Review, vol. 85, pp. 58–81.Google Scholar
  3. Bergstrom, T.C. and O. Stark (1993) ‘How Altruism Can Prevail in an Evolutionary Environment’, American Economic Review, vol. 83, pp. 149–55.Google Scholar
  4. Binmore, K.G. and L. Samuelson (1992) ‘Evolutionary Stability in Repeated Games Played by Finite Automata’, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 57, pp. 278–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cass, D. and M. Yaari (1967) ‘Individual Saving, Aggregate Capital Accumulation, and Efficient Growth’, in K. Shell (ed.), Essays on the Theory of Optimal Growth (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 233–68.Google Scholar
  6. Dawkins, R. (1976) The Selfish Gene (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  7. Falk, I. and O. Stark (2001) ‘Dynasties and Destiny: The Roles of Altruism and Impatience in the Evolution of Consumption and Bequests’, Economica, vol. 68, pp. 505–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grafen, A. (1984) ‘Natural Selection, Kin Selection and Group Selection’, in J.R. Krebs and N.B. Davis (eds), Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (Oxford: Blackwell Scientific), pp. 62–84.Google Scholar
  9. Grossman, M. (2000) ‘The Human Capital Model’, in A.J. Culyer and J.P. Newhouse (eds), Handbook of Health Economics (Amsterdam: North-Holland), pp. 347–408.Google Scholar
  10. Grossman, M. and R. Kaestner (1997) ‘Effects of Education on Health’, in J.R. Behrman and N. Staccy (eds), The Social Benefits of Education (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), pp. 69–123.Google Scholar
  11. Gutmann, M.P., S.M. Pullum-Piñon and T.W. Pullum (2001) ‘Three Eras of Young Adult Home Leaving in Twentieth-Century America’, mimeo, University of Texas at Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  12. Hamilton, W.D. (1964) ‘The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour’, Parts I and II, Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 7, pp. 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hofbauer, J. and K. Sigmund (1988) The Theory of Evolution and Dynamical Systems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  14. Kalemli-Ozcan, S., H. Ryder and D. Weil (2000) ‘Mortality Decline, Human Capital Investment, and Economic Growth’, Journal of Development Economics, vol. 62, pp. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leung, C.M.M. and Y. Wang (2003) ‘Endogenous Health Care, Life Expectancy, and Economic Growth’, mimeo, City University of Hong Kong, China.Google Scholar
  16. Nowak, M.A. and R.M. May (1992) ‘Evolutionary Games and Spatial Chaos’, Nature, vol. 359, pp. 826–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schelling, T.C. (1960) The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  18. Schelling, T.C. (1971) ‘Dynamic Models of Segregation’, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, vol. 1, pp. 143–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schelling, T.C. (1978) Micromotives and Macrobehaviour (New York: Norton).Google Scholar
  20. Stark, O. (1999) ‘Siblings, Strangers, and the Surge of Altruism’, Economics Letters, vol. 65, pp. 135–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stark, O. (1999) Altruism and Beyond: An Economic Analysis of Transfers and Exchanges Within Families and Groups (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  22. Wilson, D.S. (1987) ‘Altruism in Mendelian Populations Derived from Sibling Groups: The Haystack Model Revised’, Evolution, vol. 41, pp. 1059–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Young, H.P. (1998) Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Economic Association 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oded Stark
  • You Qiang Wang
  • Yong Wang

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations