Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

Abstract

Although standard economic theory is based on methodological individualism, this does not imply that individuals play a crucial role in economic models. On the contrary, in such a theory individuals are deprived of authentic subjective features and play no significant role as genuine subjects. The so-called homo economicus is characterized by given preferences that are conceived as exogenous and invariant over time. Therefore, the genuine psychological features of an economic agent do not matter.

* A preliminary version of the ideas discussed in this chapter was presented at the conference ‘Keynes, Knowledge and Uncertainty’ (University of Leeds, March 1996) and published in its proceedings (Vercelli, 2002). Successive versions have been presented on many occasions, including the annual conference of Anpac (San Salvador de Bahia, December 2001), the annual conference of EAEPE (Siena, November 2001), the first meeting of the Italian Society of Cognitive Sciences (Rovereto, September 2002), the World Congress of IEA (Lisbon, September 2002), and the conference on ‘Complex Behaviour in Economics’ (Aix-en-Provence, May 2003). I thank the audience at each of my presentations for their constructive comments. In addition, I wish to thank Bina Agarwal, Samuel Bowles and Stefano Fiori for their helpful suggestions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albin, P. (2001) Barriers and Bounds to Rationality: Essays on Economic Complexity and Dynamics in Interactive Systems (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe, F.J. and R.J. Aumann (1963) ‘A Definition of Subjective Probability’, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 34, pp. 199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1953) ‘Le rôle des valeurs boursières pour la répartition la meilleure des risques’, Econométrie, vol. 11, pp. 41–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. —* (1987) ‘Rationality of Seif and Others in an Economic System’, in R.M. Hogart and M.W. Reder (eds), Rational Choice. The Contrast between Economics and Psychology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 201–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. and G. Debreu (1954) ‘Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy’, Econometrica, vol. 26, pp. 265–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. and F.H. Hahn (1971) Competitive General Equilibrium Analysis (San Francisco: Holden-Day).

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg, D.K.H. (1982) The Rational Expectations Revolution in Macroeconomics (Oxford: Allan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. (1982) ‘Learning, Estimation, and the Stability of Rational Expectations Equilibria’, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 26, pp. 313–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. and N.E. Savin (1986) ‘Rational Expectations Equilibria, Learning and Model Specification’, Econometrica, vol. 54, pp. 1129–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cagan, P. (1956) ‘The Monetary Dynamics of Hyperinflation’, in M. Friedman (ed.), Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money (Chicago: Aldine), pp. 25–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCanio, S.J. (1979) ‘Rational Expectations and Learning from Experience’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 93, pp. 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1959) Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium, Cowles Foundation Monograph no. 17 (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Finetti, B. (1937) ‘La Prévision: Ses Lois Logiques, Ses Sources Subjectives’, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré, vol. 7, pp. 1–68. English translation: ‘Foresight: Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources’,

    Google Scholar 

  • in H.E. Kyburg and H.E. Smokler (eds) (1964) Studies in Subjective Probabilities (New York: Wiley), pp. 93–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, D. (1961) ‘Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 75, pp. 643–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. and M. Le Breton (1993) ‘Dynamically Consistent Beliefs Must Be Bayesian’, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 61, pp. 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G.W. (1983) ‘The Stability of Rational Expectations in Macroeconomic Models’, in R. Frydman and E.S. Phelps (eds), Individual Forecasting and Aggregate Outcomes. ‘Rational’ Expectations Examined (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 67–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G.W. and S. Honkapohja (1994) ‘Learning, Convergence and Stability with Multiple Rational Expectations Equilibria’, European Economic Review, vol. 38, pp. 1071–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2001) Learning and Expectations in Macroeconomics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, D.K. (2001) ‘Introduction’, in Albin (2001), pp. 3–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourgeaud, C., C. Gourieroux and J. Pradel (1986) ‘Learning Procedure and Convergence to Rationality’, Econometrica, vol. 54, pp. 845–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1960) Wahrheit und Methode (Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr) English translation: Truth and Method (London and New York: Sheed & Ward, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors P. and N.-E. Sahlin (1982) ‘Unreliable Probabilities, Risk Taking, and Decision Making’, Synthèse, vol. 53, pp. 361–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, I. (1987) ‘Expected Utility with Purely Subjective Non-Additive Probabilities’, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol. 16, pp. 65–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1989) ‘Additivizations of Nonadditive Measures’, Mathematics of Operation Research, vol. 4, pp. 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, I. and D. Schmeidler (1989) ‘Maximin Expected Utility with a Non-unique Prior’, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol. 18, pp. 141–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1993) ‘Updating Ambiguous Beliefs’, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 59, pp. 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingrao, B. and G. Israel (1990) The Invisible Hand: Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2003) ‘Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics’, American Economic Review, vol. 93, pp. 1449–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey D. and J. Quiggin (1992) ‘Theories of Choice under Ignorance and Uncertainty’, Journal of Economic Surveys, vol. 6(2), pp. 133–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (London: Macmillan, now Palgrave) and as Vol. 7: The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes (London: Macmillan, now Palgrave, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D.M. (1988) Notes on the Theory of Choice (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurz, M. (1994a) ‘On Rational Belief Equilibria’, Economic Theory, vol. 4, pp. 859–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1994b) ‘On the Structure and Diversity of Rational Beliefs’, Economic Theory, vol. 4, pp. 877–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurz, M. (1995) ‘Rational Preferences and Rational Beliefs’, in K.J. Arrow, E. Colombatto, M. Perlman and C. Schmidt (eds), The Rational Foundations of Economic Behaviour (London: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 339–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E. Jr. (1978) ‘Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy’, Econometrica, vol. 46, pp. 1429–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1986) ‘Adaptive Behavior and Economic Theory’, Journal of Business, vol. 59, Supplement, pp. 5401–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M.J. and D. Schmeidler (1992) ‘A More Robust Definition of Subjective Probability’, Econometrica, vol. 60(4), pp. 745–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcet, A. and T.J. Sargent (1988) ‘The Fate of Systems with “Adaptive” Expectations’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, vol. 78, pp. 168–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1989a) ‘Convergence of Least Squares Learning Mechanisms in Self-Referential Stochastic Models’, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 48, pp. 337–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1989b) ‘Convergence of Least Squares Learning in Environments with Hidden State Variables and Private Information’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 97, pp. 1306–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. (1988) Decisioni e organizzazioni (Bologna: Il Mulino).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell, A., M.D. Whinston and J.R. Green (1995) Microeconomic Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Minford, P. and D. Peel (1983) Rational Expectations and the New Macroeconomics (Oxford: Martin Robertson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern, O. and J. von Neumann (1944) The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth, J.F. (1961) ‘Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements’, Econometrica, vol. 29, pp. 315–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R., R.E. Freeman and A.C. Wicks (2003) ‘What Stakeholder Theory is Not’, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 13(4), pp. 479–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponsard, C. (1986) ‘Foundations of Soft Decision Theory’, in J. Kacprzyk and R.R. Yeger (eds), Management Decision Support Systems Using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory (Cologne: Verlag TUV).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A. (1947) Foundations of Economic Analysis (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, T.J. (1993) Bounded Rationality in Macroeconomics (Boston, MA: MIT Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.J. (1954) The Foundations of Statistics (New York: John Wiley & Sons), Revised and enlarged edition (New York: Dover, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarf, H. (1960) ‘Some Examples of Global Instability of Competitive Equilibrium’, International Economic Review, vol. 1(3), pp. 157–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D. (1982) ‘Subjective Probability Without Additivity’, Working Paper, Foerder Institute for Economic Research, Tel Aviv University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, U. (1987) ‘The Ellsberg Paradox and Risk Aversion: An Anticipated Utility Approach’, International Economic Review, vol. 28(1), pp. 175–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G.L.S. (1952) Expectations in Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1976) ‘From Substantive to Procedural Rationality’, in S.J. Latsis (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 129–48; reprinted in

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1982) Models of Bounded Rationality, vol. 2, pp. 424–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1982) Models of Bounded Rationality (Cambridge MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenschein, H. (1973) ‘Do Walras’ Identity and Continuity Characterize the Class of Community Excess Demand Functions?’, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 6, pp. 345–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vercelli, A. (1991) Methodological Foundations of Macroeconomics. Keynes and Lucas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • — (1995) ‘From Soft Uncertainty to Hard Environmental Uncertainty’, Economie Appliquée, vol. 48, pp. 251–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1999) ‘The Recent Advances in Decision Theory under Uncertainty: A Nontechnical Introduction’, in L. Luini (ed.), Uncertain Decisions: Bridging Theory and Experiments (Dordrecht: Kluwer), pp. 237–60.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • — (2000) ‘Financial Fragility and Cyclical Fluctuations’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 1, pp. 139–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2002) ‘Uncertainty, Rationality and Learning: A Keynesian Perspective’, in S. Dow and J. Hillard (eds), Keynes, Uncertainty and the Global Economy, Vol. 2 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), pp. 88–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walras, L. (1874) Elément d’économie politique pure ou théorie de la richesse sociale (Lausanne: L. Corbaz)

    Google Scholar 

  • trans. W. Jaffé, Elements of Pure Economics or The Theory of Social Wealth (London: Allen & Unwin), 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willinger, M. (1990) ‘Irréversibilité et cohérence dynamique des choix’, Revue d’Economie Politique, vol. 100(6), pp. 808–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, M. (1990) ‘Learning to Believe in Sunspots’, Econometrica, vol. 58, pp. 277–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vercelli, A. (2005). Rationality, Learning and Complexity. In: Agarwal, B., Vercelli, A. (eds) Psychology, Rationality and Economic Behaviour. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522343_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics