Foreign Investment in Nepal

  • Prema-Chandra Athukorala
  • Kishor Sharma

Abstract

The past two decades have witnessed a profound shift in the policy emphasis on foreign direct investment (FDI) in developing countries (DCs). In a significant departure from the scepticism about the developmental role of FDI that pervaded policy thinking for over three decades during the postwar era, more and more countries have become increasingly receptive to FDI as an integral element of outward-oriented policy reforms. Despite this notable policy shift, the literature on the role of FDI in developing countries still remains both sparse and lopsided. The few available analyses have focussed almost exclusively on the experience of the middle- and upper-middle income developing countries, in particular the high-performing countries in East Asia. Policy inferences coming from this literature are of limited value for latecomers because the role of FDI vary across countries depending on changes in the process of internationalisation of production and the nature and timing of policy shifts, and the initial conditions of the given host country such as the degree of industrial advancement and the stage of entrepreneurial development.

Keywords

Transportation Income Marketing Malaysia Monopoly 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Athukorala, P. (1995). ‘Foreign Direct Investment and Manufacturing for Export in a New Exporting Country: The case of Sri Lanka’, World Economy, 14 (2): 543–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Athukorala, P. and J. Menon (1996). ‘Foreign Direct Investment and Industrialisation in Malaysia: Exports, Employment and Spillovers’; Asian Economic Journal, 10 (1): 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Athukorala, P. and S. Chand (2000). ‘Trade Orientation and Productivity Gains from International Production: a study of overseas operations of United States transnational corporations’, Transnational Corporation, 9 (2): 1–30Google Scholar
  4. Bagchi, S. (1998). ‘The Textiles and Clothing Sector in Nepal’, Division of International Trade and Commodities, UNCTAD (mimeo )Google Scholar
  5. Balasubramanyan, V. and Salisu, M. and D. Sapsford (1996). ‘Foreign Direct Investment and Growth in EP and IS Countries’, Economic Journal, 106 (434): 92–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhagwati, J. (1991). ‘Investing Abroad’, in Political Economy and International Economics, D. Irwin (ed.), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass: 309–39.Google Scholar
  7. Bhagwati, J. (2004). In Defence of Globalization Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Caves, R. (1996). Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, Cambridge University. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  9. Freenstra, R. (1998). ‘Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Global Economy’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14 (4): 31–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Government of Nepal (1987). Industrial Policy and Industrial Development Act, Ministry of Industries, Foreign Investment Promotion Division, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
  11. Government of Nepal, Economic Survey Kathmandu: Ministry of Finance (various issues). IMF (International Monetary Fund) (1999). Nepal: Recent Economic Developments IMF, Washington DC (mimeo).Google Scholar
  12. Kokko, A. and M. Zejan (1996). ‘Planned and Failed Foreign Direct Investment in Viet Nam’, Asian Pacific Development Journal, 3 (1): 37–54.Google Scholar
  13. Moran, T. (1998). Foreign Direct Investment and Development, Institute for International Economics, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  14. Nayyar, D. (1978). ‘Transnational Corporations and Manufactured Exports from Poor Countries’, Economic Journal, 88, 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sharma, K. (2001). ‘Liberalization, Growth and Structural Change: evidence from Nepalese manufacturing’, Applied Economics, 33: 1253–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sharma, K. (2004). ‘The Impact of Policy Reforms on Labour Productivity, Price Cost Margin and Total Factor Productivity: The Nepalese Experience’, South Asia Economic Journal. 5 (1): 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Srinivasan, T. (1986). ‘The Cost and Benefits of Being a Small, Remote, Island, Landlocked or Mini-State Economy’, World Bank Research Observer, 1 (2): 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. UNIDO (2002). Industrial Development Perspective Plan: Vision 220, Analytical Report, prepared for His Majesty’s Government of Nepal, Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Supplies by the UNIDO, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
  19. UNCTAD, World Investment Report (various issues).Google Scholar
  20. Wells, L. Jr. (1994). ‘Mobile Exporters: New Foreign Investors in East Asia’, in Foreign Direct Investment, K. Froot (ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 173–91.Google Scholar
  21. Wells, L. Jr, and N. Allen (2001). ‘Using Tax Incentives to Compete for Foreign Investment: Are They Worth the Cost?’, Foreign Investment Advisory Service Occasional Paper 15, International Finance Corporation and World Bank, Washington DC, 1–67.Google Scholar
  22. World Bank (1993). The East Asian Miracle, Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Prema-chandra Athukorala and Kishor Sharma 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Prema-Chandra Athukorala
  • Kishor Sharma

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations