Skip to main content

RTAs and South Asia: Options in the Wake of Cancun Fiasco

  • Chapter

Abstract

Ever since the collapse of Cancun Ministerial and the US Trade Representative Robert Zoellick’s reiteration to go for bilateral and regional trade agreements (RTAs) in a subsequent press conference, the debate on multilateralism vs. regionalism got a fresh impetus. It is being widely feared that the collapse of WTO trade talks may shift nations’ focus to bilateral or regional pacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Dubey, M. (2004), ‘SATTA: A perspective’, The Hindu, 10 January 2004, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. (1997). ‘Regional Trading Blocks in the World Economic System’, Institute of International Economics, Washington DC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. and S. Wei (1997). ‘The New Regionalism and Asia: Impact and Options’, in The Global Trading System and Developing Asia, N. Rao and A. Panagariya (eds), Oxford University Press, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICTSD (2003). ‘Bridges Miami Daily Update on the V III FTAA Ministerial Meeting’, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Limao, N. (2002). ‘Are Preferential Trade Agreements with Non-Trade Objectives a Stumbling Block for Multilateral Liberalisation?’, University of Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. and M. Newman (2003). ‘EU Unlikely to Switch to Bilateral Deals’, Wall Street Journal as published in Financial Express on 8th November 2003, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2003). ‘Regionalism and the Multilateral Trading System’, Policy Brief, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagariya, A. (2002). ‘South Asia: Does Preferential Trade Liberalisation Make Sense?’, University of Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T. and G. Canonero (1993). ‘Preferential Trading Arrangements: Estimating the Effects on South Asian Countries’, Yale University and the World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T. and G. Canonero (1995). ‘Preferential Trading Arrangements in South Asia: Theory, Empirics and Policy’, Yale University and the World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2000a). ‘World Development Report 1999/2000’, World Bank, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (20006). ‘Regional Integration Agreements’, World Bank, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2002). ‘International Trade Statistics 2002’, World Trade Organisation, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2003). ‘World Trade Report 2003’, World Trade Organisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Pradeep S. Mehta and Pranav Kumar

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mehta, P.S., Kumar, P. (2005). RTAs and South Asia: Options in the Wake of Cancun Fiasco. In: Jha, R. (eds) Economic Growth, Economic Performance and Welfare in South Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230520318_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics