Strategic Offshoring: Decision Analysis, Best Practices, and Emerging Trends

  • Dan B. D. Bhide


Any decision related to ‘optimal sourcing’ of business processes or IT functions is complex enough to arrive at and more so to implement successfully. This is because of the sheer multitude of options available — from in-sourcing to co-sourcing to outsourcing — and equally wide ranging objective and subjective factors that go into decision making and successful implementation of a sourcing decision — from strategic, tactical and operational to economic, political and competitive factors. Offshore sourcing (‘offshoring’) of business processes and IT functions adds several more layers of complexity and hence risks to the sourcing lifecycle (Figure 2.1), while, as one would expect, also offering significant potential competitive advantages if implemented correctly.


Service Provider Business Process Capability Maturity Model Offshore Outsource Customer Contact Centre 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M.F. Greaver, II, Strategic Outsourcing: A Structure Approach to Outsourcing Decisions and Initiatives (New York: American Management Association, 1999).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rob Aalders, The IT Outsourcing Guide (Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, 2001).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daniel Minoli (1995) Analyzing Outsourcing — Reengineering Information and Communication Systems (New York: McGraw Hill Inc., 1995).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Elliott, (ed.), Outsourcing: A Strategic Framework (A Productivity Quality Center — APQC — Publication, 1997).Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    M.F. Corbett, ‘Corbett’s Core Competencies Test’, retrieved on September 3, 2001 from Scholar
  6. 10.
    C.K. Prahlad and G. Hamel (1990) ‘The Core Competence of the Corporation’, Harvard Business Review, 68 (3) (1990) 79–91.Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    Queensland Government, Australia, ‘The Queensland Government Guide to Best Practice in IT Outsourcing’, Government Information and Communication Technology, June, 1997. Retrieved on January 7, 2004 from Scholar
  8. 13.
    Bierce and Kenerson, P.C., ‘What and when you should not outsource’, retrieved on August 11, 2003 from Scholar
  9. 15.
    Customer Operations Performance Center, ‘Release 3.3 — COPC-2000 CSP Gold Standard’, retrieved on February 7, 2004 from Scholar
  10. 16.
    The IT Services Qualification Center, ‘The eSourcing Capability Model for Service Providers eSourcing Capability Model (eSCM-SP) v2’, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, retrieved on July 27, 2004 from Scholar
  11. 17.
    T.L. Saaty, ‘Multicriteria Decision Making — The Analytic Hierarchy Process’ (Pittsburgh: RWS Publications, 1992).Google Scholar
  12. 18.
    T.L. Saaty, ‘Decision Making for Leaders’ (Pittsburgh: RWS Publications, 1992).Google Scholar
  13. 19.
    W. Edwards, ‘How to use Multiattribute Utility Theory for Social Decision Making’, IEEE Trans. Systems Man, Cybern. 7 (1997) 326–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 20.
    R. Kamenetzky, ‘The Relationship Between the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Additive Value Function’, Decision Sciences, 13 (1982) 702–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 21.
    D. von Winterfeldt and W. Edwards, ‘Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research’ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
  16. 23.
    Excerpt from Sourcing Interest Group research report, 2003, ‘Best Practices in Procurement Outsourcing’, retrieved on October 2, 2003 from Scholar

Copyright information

© Dan (B.D.) Bhide 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan B. D. Bhide

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations