The Outsourcing Contract: Structure and Tactics

  • Peter Brudenall


All too often, the parties to an outsourcing arrangement realise soon after the commencement of the relationship that they have, unintentionally, not been following the contract, or that the contract fails to address specific issues. While there may be any number of reasons why this has happened, typically they involve the parties not taking the time to fully articulate in sufficient detail the key obligations of each party. Not spending enough time establishing the scope of services to be performed is perhaps the most common problem. The pressure to finalise the deal can often result in a lack of attention to what is most important to ensuring a successful outsourcing relationship. In such cases, the parties will often need to renegotiate the contract or, in a worst case scenario where the relationship has broken down, the customer may need to start the process again.


Corporate Governance Service Level Dispute Resolution Alternative Dispute Resolution Financial Service Authority 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Gartner, 2004, Best Practices and Trends in Outsourcing, Scholar
  2. Gartner, Successful IT Outsourcing, August 2003.Google Scholar
  3. M. Lacity and L. Willcocks, Global Information Technology Outsourcing: Search for Business Advantage, Wiley, Chichester (2001)Google Scholar
  4. S. Cullen and L. Willcocks, Intelligent IT Outsourcing: Eight Building Blocks to Success, Elsevier, Oxford (2003).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Peter Brudenall 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Brudenall

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations