Abstract
Within today’s German federal system, Bavaria has been uniquely successful in maintaining a distinctive identity. Bavarian politicians define and defend Bavarian interests with the kind of unabashed assertiveness that many of their colleagues from the other German states only dream of. What are the reasons for this distinctiveness? Certainly Bavaria’s economic success ranks high among possible explanations. But cultural self-imaging and economic drive intertwine in obvious ways. One might ask whether Bavaria’s recent economic success over the past three decades is not partly the result of its citizens’ historical ability to cultivate bristly distinctiveness and to draw a highly qualified workforce from Germany — and abroad — into a cultural landscape that enjoys international repute. The cultural and social meaning ascribed to traditional Bavarian customs and costumes is invariably contested by insiders and outsiders. Yet that contest itself assures the attention of outsiders far more than uniformity and standardisation ever could. Non-Germans habitually associate Germany with beer, Sauerkraut, the Autobahn, the Oktoberfest, the Nazis, Lederhosen, ‘that fairytale castle on a mountain’, and precision-engineered automobiles. Remarkably, though, these hallmarks of ‘German’ culture are at least as much Bavarian as they are German. Hence one could inquire why one federal state should attain such status as a synecdoche for the entire country.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Cited in Dieter Albrecht, ‘Von der Reichsgrundung bis zum Ende des Ersten Weltkriegs,’ in M. Spindler (ed.), Handbuch der bayerischen Geschichte, vol. 4, part 1 (2nd edn., Mtinchen 2003), p. 338.
Cf. Margaret Lavinia Anderson, Practicing Democracy. Elections and Political Culture in Imperial Germany (Princeton, NJ 2000).
Friedrich Hartmannsgruber, Die bayerische Patriotenpartei 1868–1887 (Munchen 1986), pp. 18–21.
Ibid., pp. 32f.
Jochen Schmidt, Bayern und das Zoliparlament. Politik und Wirtschaft in den letzten Jaliren vor der Reichsgrtindung (1866/67–1870). Zur Strukturanalyse Bayerns im In-dustriezeitalter (Miinchen 1973), pp. 134ff.; Karl Rohe, Wahlen und Waldertraditionen in Deutschland (Frankfurt a. M. 1992), pp. 71f.
See H. Schulthess (ed.), EuropAischer Geschichtskalender, 22 May and 25 November 1869, p. 178, p. 213.
See Heinrich August Winkler, ‘Vom linken zum rechten Nationalismus; Geschichte und Gesellschaft 4 (1978), pp. 5–28.
Heinz Gollwitzer, ‘Josef Edmund Jorg,’ Zeitschrift fiir bayerische Landes-geschichte 15 (1949), p. 142; also Hans Rall, ‘Die politische Entwicklung von 1848 bis zur Reichsgri.indung 1871’, in Spindler (ed.), Handbucli, pp. 307f.
Allan Mitchell, “‘A Real Foreign Country”: Bavarian Particularism in Imperial Germany,1870–1918; Francia 7 (1979), p. 590.
Wilhelm Emmanuel v. Ketteler, Die Katholiken im Deutsclten Reiche. Entwurf zu einein politischen Prograinin (Mainz 1873), cited in Hans Fenske, Im Bismarckschen Reich, 1871–1890 (Darmstadt 1978), pp. 99f.
Details on Sedan Days in Miinchen in Nils Freytag, ‘Sedantage in Miinchen. Gemeindefeiem, Komiteefeste und Vereinsgedenken, Zeitschrift fiir bayerische Landesgeschichte 61 (1998), pp. 388–96 passim.
Fleinrich Schulthess (ed.), Europaischer Geschichtskalender, 30 April 1875 (Nordlingen 1876).
Wilfried Loth, Katholiken irn Kaiserreich. Der politische Katholizismus in der Krise des Wilhelminischen Deutschlands (Düsseldorf 1983), pp. 35 and 18f.
David Blackbourn, ‘Die Zentrumspartei und die deutschen Katholiken während des Kulturkampfs tmd danach,’ in Otto Pflanze (ed.), Innenpolitische Probleme des Bismarck-Reiches, (Munchen/Wien 1983), pp. 82f. For the common themes of various conservative party programs in Bavaria, see Schulthess (ed.), Geschichtskalender, 6 March 1877 (Catholic People s Party); 30 April 1881 (extreme patriotic, ultramontane); also 31 October 1881 (ultramontane majority in the Bavarian Second Chamber).
Carl Schorske’s label for right-wing populism in the Austro-Hungarian Empire in his study Fin-de-Siecle Vienna (New York 1979).
Cf. Peter Steinbach’s study, Die Zahinung des politischen Massenmarktes: Wahlen und Wahlkiimpfe im Bismarckreich im Spiegel der Hauptstadt- und Gesinnungspresse (Passau 1990).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fink, E. (2005). For Country, Court and Church: The Bavarian Patriots’ Party and Bavarian Regional Identity in the Era of German Unification. In: Speirs, R., Breuilly, J. (eds) Germany’s Two Unifications. New Perspectives in German Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230518520_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230518520_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52369-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-51852-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)