For Country, Court and Church: The Bavarian Patriots’ Party and Bavarian Regional Identity in the Era of German Unification

  • Erwin Fink
Part of the New Perspectives in German Studies book series (NPG)

Abstract

Within today’s German federal system, Bavaria has been uniquely successful in maintaining a distinctive identity. Bavarian politicians define and defend Bavarian interests with the kind of unabashed assertiveness that many of their colleagues from the other German states only dream of. What are the reasons for this distinctiveness? Certainly Bavaria’s economic success ranks high among possible explanations. But cultural self-imaging and economic drive intertwine in obvious ways. One might ask whether Bavaria’s recent economic success over the past three decades is not partly the result of its citizens’ historical ability to cultivate bristly distinctiveness and to draw a highly qualified workforce from Germany — and abroad — into a cultural landscape that enjoys international repute. The cultural and social meaning ascribed to traditional Bavarian customs and costumes is invariably contested by insiders and outsiders. Yet that contest itself assures the attention of outsiders far more than uniformity and standardisation ever could. Non-Germans habitually associate Germany with beer, Sauerkraut, the Autobahn, the Oktoberfest, the Nazis, Lederhosen, ‘that fairytale castle on a mountain’, and precision-engineered automobiles. Remarkably, though, these hallmarks of ‘German’ culture are at least as much Bavarian as they are German. Hence one could inquire why one federal state should attain such status as a synecdoche for the entire country.

Keywords

Lime Volatility Defend Cond Harness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Cited in Dieter Albrecht, ‘Von der Reichsgrundung bis zum Ende des Ersten Weltkriegs,’ in M. Spindler (ed.), Handbuch der bayerischen Geschichte, vol. 4, part 1 (2nd edn., Mtinchen 2003), p. 338.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cf. Margaret Lavinia Anderson, Practicing Democracy. Elections and Political Culture in Imperial Germany (Princeton, NJ 2000).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Friedrich Hartmannsgruber, Die bayerische Patriotenpartei 1868–1887 (Munchen 1986), pp. 18–21.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ibid., pp. 32f.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jochen Schmidt, Bayern und das Zoliparlament. Politik und Wirtschaft in den letzten Jaliren vor der Reichsgrtindung (1866/67–1870). Zur Strukturanalyse Bayerns im In-dustriezeitalter (Miinchen 1973), pp. 134ff.; Karl Rohe, Wahlen und Waldertraditionen in Deutschland (Frankfurt a. M. 1992), pp. 71f.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    See H. Schulthess (ed.), EuropAischer Geschichtskalender, 22 May and 25 November 1869, p. 178, p. 213.Google Scholar
  7. 15.
    See Heinrich August Winkler, ‘Vom linken zum rechten Nationalismus; Geschichte und Gesellschaft 4 (1978), pp. 5–28.Google Scholar
  8. 18.
    Heinz Gollwitzer, ‘Josef Edmund Jorg,’ Zeitschrift fiir bayerische Landes-geschichte 15 (1949), p. 142; also Hans Rall, ‘Die politische Entwicklung von 1848 bis zur Reichsgri.indung 1871’, in Spindler (ed.), Handbucli, pp. 307f.Google Scholar
  9. 19.
    Allan Mitchell, “‘A Real Foreign Country”: Bavarian Particularism in Imperial Germany,1870–1918; Francia 7 (1979), p. 590.Google Scholar
  10. 41.
    Wilhelm Emmanuel v. Ketteler, Die Katholiken im Deutsclten Reiche. Entwurf zu einein politischen Prograinin (Mainz 1873), cited in Hans Fenske, Im Bismarckschen Reich, 1871–1890 (Darmstadt 1978), pp. 99f.Google Scholar
  11. 45.
    Details on Sedan Days in Miinchen in Nils Freytag, ‘Sedantage in Miinchen. Gemeindefeiem, Komiteefeste und Vereinsgedenken, Zeitschrift fiir bayerische Landesgeschichte 61 (1998), pp. 388–96 passim.Google Scholar
  12. 53.
    Fleinrich Schulthess (ed.), Europaischer Geschichtskalender, 30 April 1875 (Nordlingen 1876).Google Scholar
  13. 54.
    Wilfried Loth, Katholiken irn Kaiserreich. Der politische Katholizismus in der Krise des Wilhelminischen Deutschlands (Düsseldorf 1983), pp. 35 and 18f.Google Scholar
  14. 55.
    David Blackbourn, ‘Die Zentrumspartei und die deutschen Katholiken während des Kulturkampfs tmd danach,’ in Otto Pflanze (ed.), Innenpolitische Probleme des Bismarck-Reiches, (Munchen/Wien 1983), pp. 82f. For the common themes of various conservative party programs in Bavaria, see Schulthess (ed.), Geschichtskalender, 6 March 1877 (Catholic People s Party); 30 April 1881 (extreme patriotic, ultramontane); also 31 October 1881 (ultramontane majority in the Bavarian Second Chamber).Google Scholar
  15. 57.
    Carl Schorske’s label for right-wing populism in the Austro-Hungarian Empire in his study Fin-de-Siecle Vienna (New York 1979).Google Scholar
  16. 58.
    Cf. Peter Steinbach’s study, Die Zahinung des politischen Massenmarktes: Wahlen und Wahlkiimpfe im Bismarckreich im Spiegel der Hauptstadt- und Gesinnungspresse (Passau 1990).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erwin Fink

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations