The Right (and Prudent) Thing To Do

  • Paul D. Williams

Abstract

While in opposition, Labour consistently criticised John Major’s government for its ‘indifference to Britain’s obligations to the world community’. Labour, in contrast, argued that ‘Membership of the world community carries with it responsibilities as well as rights. No responsible member of the world community can accept an outcome in which much of mankind lives and dies in hunger, and in which too many children are denied their chance to grow to adulthood.’1 Having assumed power, Blair’s government re-established a separate department, DFID, under Clare Short’s stewardship to help meet these obligations. With Blair’s support, DFID quickly set out a series of powerful moral and prudential arguments about the need to tackle underdevelopment and promote global justice. Short put the moral argument in the foreword to DFID’s 1997 White Paper. ‘It is our duty’, she wrote, ‘to care about other people, in particular those less well off than ourselves. We all have a moral duty to reach out to the poor and needy.’2 The prudential case appeared in the foreword to DFID’s 2000 White Paper. Here Blair highlighted the links between underdevelopment, injustice and the UK’s security arguing that, ‘Many of the problems which affect us — war and conflict, international crime and the trade in illicit drugs, and the spread of health pandemics like HIV/AIDS — are caused or exacerbated by poverty.’3

Keywords

Methane Migration Dioxide Europe Eter 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Labour Party, A Fresh Start for Britain (London: 1996), pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
  2. 6.
    Thomas Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights (Oxford: Polity 2002), p. 20.Google Scholar
  3. 8.
    Tony Blair, ‘Doctrine of the International Community’, speech to the Economic Club of Chicago, 22 Apr. 1999. Emphasis added.Google Scholar
  4. 9.
    Cited in John Kampfner, Blairs Wars (London: Phoenix, 2003), p. 64.Google Scholar
  5. 10.
    The first quote is from Adrian Hewitt, ‘Beyond Poverty? The new UK policy on international development and globalisation’, Third World Quarterly, 22: 2 (2001), p. 291; the second is from Richard Dowden, ‘Clare Short’, Prospect, Issue 74 (May 2002), p. 42.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    John Dickie, The New Mandarins (London: I.B. Tauris, 2004), pp. 225–6.Google Scholar
  7. 14.
    See Paul Cammack, ‘Making the poor work for globalisation?’, New Political Economy, 6: 3 (2001), pp. 397–408.Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    Alan Whaites, ‘The new UK White Paper on international development: an NGO perspective’, Journal of Lnternational Development, 10: 2 (1998), p. 203.Google Scholar
  9. 17.
    Adrian Hewitt and Tony Killick, ‘The 1975 and 1997 White Papers compared: enriched vision, depleted policies?’, Journal of Lnternational Development, 10: 2 (1998), p. 194.Google Scholar
  10. 18.
    Ralph A. Young, ‘New Labour and international development’, in David Coates and Peter Lawler (eds), New Labour in Power (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000), p. 261.Google Scholar
  11. 19.
    Hewitt, ‘Beyond poverty?’, p. 294. That said, unlike the 1997 White Paper it did promise a new international development act. See also Slater and Bell, ‘Aid and geopolitics’. For a retrospective analysis (and defence) of the White Paper from DFID’s Chief Economist see Adrian Wood, ‘The 2000 White Paper Reconsidered’, Journal of lnternational Development, 16: 7 (2004), pp. 933–7.Google Scholar
  12. 27.
    Tony Blair, ‘Foreword’, in Making Globalisation Work, p. 6.Google Scholar
  13. 28.
    See International Finance Facility (London: HM Treasury/DFID, Jan. 2003), the up-dated version of April 2004, and Gordon Brown’s speech to the Chatham House Conference on Corporate Social Responsibility, Chatham House, London, 22 Jan. 2003. For a sympathetic academic analysis of the Facility see Paul Mosley, ‘Avoiding the Elephant Traps’, Journal of Lnternational Development, 16: 6 (2004), pp. 879–86.Google Scholar
  14. 35.
    Simon Maxwell and Roger Riddell, ‘Conditionality or contract: perspectives on partnership for development’, Journal of International Development, 10: 2 (1998), pp. 264.Google Scholar
  15. 42.
    For details see Mark Hillyard, Cancellation of Third World Debt (London: House of Commons Research Paper 98/81, 4 Aug. 1998) and Third World Debt: After the Okinawa Summit (London: House of Commons Research Paper 00/75, 8 Aug. 2000).Google Scholar
  16. 49.
    Gordon Brown, ‘Smash the chains’, Guardian, 21 Dec. 1999.Google Scholar
  17. 51.
    Ashok Sinha, Call For Change (Jubilee Debt Campaign and World Development Movement, March 2004) at www.jubileedebtcampaign.org.uk/media/reports/callforchangefinalapr2004.docGoogle Scholar
  18. 53.
    Will Hutton, ‘The Jubilee line that works’, Observer, 3 Oct. 1999.Google Scholar
  19. 56.
    See Robin Marris, ‘Eliminating debt will not save the poor’, Guardian, 11 Oct. 1999 and Tony Killick, ‘Politics, evidence and the new aid agenda’, Development Policy Review, 22: 1 (2004), pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
  20. 57.
    Robin Cook, ‘Conflict prevention in the modern world’, speech to the fifty-fourth session of the UN General Assembly, New York, 21 Sept. 1999.Google Scholar
  21. 63.
    Fred Halliday, ‘New Labour abroad’, Prospect, Issue 64 (Jun. 2001), p. 29.Google Scholar
  22. 66.
    Tony Lloyd, MP, press conference, 15 June 1998, Rome at www.un.org/icc/journal/156ukpc.htmGoogle Scholar
  23. 67.
    Spyros Econornides, ‘The international criminal court’, in Karen E. Smith and Margot Light (eds), Ethics and Foreign Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), p. 119.Google Scholar
  24. 71.
    Tony Blair, ‘Speech on climate change’, London, 14 Sept. 2004.Google Scholar
  25. 74.
    Michael Grub, ‘Britannia waives the rules: The UK, the EU and climate change’, New Economy, 9: 3 (2002), p. 140.Google Scholar
  26. 76.
    Hermann E. Ott, ‘Climate change: an important foreign policy issue’, International A ffairs, 77: 2 (2001), p. 292.Google Scholar
  27. 80.
    Tom Baldwin, ‘Britain’s secret plan for new global climate pact’, Times, 9 Dec. 2004 and Bronwen Maddox, ‘Blair’s new climate deal is little more than Cloud Nine’, Times, 9 Dec. 2004.Google Scholar
  28. 81.
    Valerie Elliott, ‘Growth in travel means Britain will miss its own greenhouse target’, Times, 9 Dec. 2004.Google Scholar
  29. 82.
    Richard Black, ‘UK emissions rise “within target” ’, BBC News Online, 22 Mar. 2005.Google Scholar
  30. 84.
    Peter Hall cited in Andrew Jordan, The Europeanization of British Environmental Policy (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002), p. 2.Google Scholar
  31. 86.
    Peter Newell and Matthew Paterson, ‘A climate for business’, Review of International Political Economy, 5: 4 (1998), pp. 679–703.Google Scholar
  32. 87.
    John Browne, Group Chief Executive of BP Plc, for instance, has argued that ‘emission trading regimes … are the best policy for encouraging business’ to pursue sustainable practices. John Browne, ‘Beyond Kyoto’, Foreign Affairs, 83: 4 (2004), p. 28.Google Scholar
  33. 88.
    Blair, ‘Speech on Climate Change’. 89. See Newell and Paterson, ‘A climate for business’.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Paul D. Williams 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul D. Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations