Advertisement

“The first of a new genus —”: Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Hays, and The Analytical Review

  • Mary A. Waters
Chapter
  • 27 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in the Enlightenment, Romanticism and Cultures of Print book series (PERCP)

Abstract

On 7 November 1787 Mary Wollstonecraft, the 28-year-old former proprietor of an only temporarily successful girls’ school and author of a treatise on education, who had recently been discharged from her position as governess with the family of an Irish peer, wrote to her sister Everina: “Mr Johnson […] assures me that if I exert my talents in writing, I may support myself in a comfortable way. I am then going to be the first of a new genus — I tremble at the attempt.”1 When she wrote this, Wollstonecraft was well aware she was not the first woman to try to support herself through writing. Only recently arrived in London, she had not yet made the acquaintance of the numerous women writers who were to be a part of her circle in the coming years. Still, she had read sufficient educational literature, conduct books, novels, and poetry by women to realize that some women were earning income by writing. In publications by women writers prefaces apologizing on the grounds of financial need for the transgressive immodesty of going public had become common enough to seem almost a cliché. In fact, Wollstonecraft had herself recently turned author to ease financial embarrassments that resulted when she tried to set to rights a family headed by her profligate and inept father. What she recognized as unique about her new relationship with bookseller Joseph Johnson was the nature of the business arrangement.

Keywords

Eighteenth Century Public Sphere Literary Criticism Literary Work Analytical Review 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Collected Letters of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Ralph M. Wardle (Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1979), 164.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gary Kelly, Revolutionary Feminism: The Mind and Career of Mary Wollstonecraft (London: Macmillan, 1992).Google Scholar
  3. Gina M. Luria, “Mary Hays: A Critical Biography” (Ph.D. Diss., New York U, 1972).Google Scholar
  4. Janet Todd, Mary Wollstonecraft: A Revolutionary Life (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2000).Google Scholar
  5. Eleanor Ty, Unsex’d Revolutionaries: Five Women Novelists of the 1790s (Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1993).Google Scholar
  6. A. F. Wedd, ed., The Love-Letters of Mary Hays (1779–1780) (London: Methuen, 1925), 1–14.Google Scholar
  7. 4.
    Kevin Gilmartin, Print Politics: The Press and Radical Opposition in Early Nineteenth-Century England, Cambridge Studies in Romanticism 21 (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996).Google Scholar
  8. Mark Parker Literary Magazines and British Romanticism, Cambridge Studies in Romanticism 45 (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000).Google Scholar
  9. Thomas Pfau, Wordsworth’s Profession: Form, Class, and the Logic of Early Romantic Cultural Production (Stanford: Stanford UP, 1997).Google Scholar
  10. Marcus Wood, Radical Satire and Print Culture, 1790–1822 (Oxford: Oxford UP, 1994).Google Scholar
  11. 5.
    Gerald P. Tyson’s Joseph Johnson: A Liberal Publisher (Iowa City: University of Iowa P, 1979).Google Scholar
  12. Leslie F. Chard II, “Joseph Johnson: Father of the Book Trade,” Bulletin of the New York Public Library 79 [1975]: 51–82.Google Scholar
  13. 8.
    Marilyn Butler, “Culture’s Medium: The Role of the Review,” The Cambridge Companion to British Romanticism, ed. Stuart Curran (Cambridge: U of Cambridge P, 1993), 120–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Janet Todd and Marilyn Butler, 7 vols. (London: William Pickering, 1989) 7:127.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Charlotte Smith’s Ethelinde, or the Recluse of the Lake (London: Cadell, 1789).Google Scholar
  16. Mrs Bennet’s Agnes de Courci; A Domestic Tale (Bath: Hazard; London: Robinsons, 1789).Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    Samuel Johnson, Rambler No. 4 (31 March 1750).Google Scholar
  18. 41.
    Poovey, The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer: Ideology as Style in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen, Women in Culture and Society, ed. Catherine R. Stimpson (Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1984).Google Scholar
  19. Janet Todd’s Sensibility and The Sign of Angellica: Women, Writing, and Fiction, 1660–1800 (New York: Columbia UP, 1989).Google Scholar
  20. Moira Ferguson and Janet Todd’s Mary Wollstonecraft, Twayne’s English Authors Series (Boston: Twayne, 1984).Google Scholar
  21. 43.
    Myers, “Sensibility and the ‘Walk of Reason’: Mary Wollstonecraft’s Literary Reviews as Cultural Critique,” Sensibility in Transformation: Creative Resistance to Sentiment from the Augustans to the Romantics, ed. Syndy McMillen Conger (Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson UP, 1990) 129–31.Google Scholar
  22. 44.
    Orrin N. C. Wang, “The Other Reasons: Female Alterity and Enlightenment Discourse in Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman,” Yale Journal of Criticism 5 (1991): 129–49.Google Scholar
  23. Syndy McMillen Conger, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Language of Sensibility [Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson UP, 1994).Google Scholar
  24. Harriet Devine Jump, Mary Wollstonecraft: Writer (New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994).Google Scholar
  25. Catherine N. Parke, “What Kind of Heroine is Mary Wollstonecraft?” Sensibility in Transformation: Creative Resistance to Sentiment from the Augustans to the Romantics (Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson UP, 1990) 103–19.Google Scholar
  26. Timothy J. Reiss, “Revolution in Bounds: Wollstonecraft, Women, and Reason,” Gender and Theory, ed. Linda Kauffman (New York: Basil Blackwell, 1989) 11–50.Google Scholar
  27. Susan Khin Zaw, “The Reasonable Heart: Mary Wollstonecraft’s View of the Relation Between Reason and Feeling in Morality, Moral Psychology, and Moral Development,” Hypatia 13 (1998): 78–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Taylor, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination, Cambridge Studies in Romanticism 56 [Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003].Google Scholar
  29. 57.
    Terry Belanger, “Publishers and Writers in Eighteenth-Century England,” Books and their Readers in Eighteenth-Century England, ed. Isabel Rivers [n.p., Leicester UP, 1982]: 5–26.Google Scholar
  30. Gerring, Notes on Printers and Booksellers; Michael Harris, “Periodicals and the Book Trade,” Development of the English Book Trade, 1700–1899, ed. Robin Myers and Michael Harris [Oxford: Oxford Polytechnic, 1981], 66–94.Google Scholar
  31. 62.
    Derek Roper, “The Politics of the Critical Review, 1766–1817,” Durham University Journal 53 (1961): 117–22.Google Scholar
  32. 66.
    The Correspondence (1779–1843) of Mary Hays, British Novelist ed. Marilyn L. Brooks (Lampeter: Edwin Mellen P, 2004).Google Scholar
  33. 71.
    Jane Worthington Smyser, “The Trial and Imprisonment of Joseph Johnson, Bookseller,” Bulletin of the New York Public Library 77 (1974): 418–35.Google Scholar
  34. 76.
    Henry Crabb Robinson on Books and Their Writers, ed. Edith J. Morley, 3 vols. (London: M. M. Dent, 1938), 1:124–5 and passim).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mary A. Waters 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary A. Waters
    • 1
  1. 1.Wichita State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations