Skip to main content

Automatic Thinking and Store Choices by Near and Distant Customers

  • Chapter
  • 81 Accesses

Abstract

Holden and Lutz (1992) propose that the reason consumers evoke different brands from long term memory into working memory is that different associates (e.g., benefits, attributes) have stronger links to some brands than others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arnold, S. J., Handelman, J. and Tigert D. J. “Organizational legitimacy and retail store patronage,” in Journal of Business Research, 35, 3 (March 1996): 229–239, Cutting Edge Research in Retailing.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S. J., Oum, T. H. and Tigert, D. J. “Determinant Attributes in Retail Patronage: Seasonal, Temporal, Regional, and International Comparison,” Journal of Marketing Research, 20 (May 1983): 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, J. N. “Attitude Measures that Predict Purchase,” Journal of Advertising Research, 8 (February/March 1968): 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, S. Experimentation in Marketing, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L.W. “Ideals, central tendency and frequency of instatiation as determinants of graded structures in categories,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11 (1985): 629–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. and Sewell, D. R. “Contrasting the Representation of Scripts and Categories,” Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 6 (1985): 646–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. “The Level of Consciousness: A Dynamic Approach to the Recall Technique,” Journal of Marketing, 3 (May 1966): 142–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H. “How Do Attitudes Guide Behaviour?” in Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations o f Social Behaviour (eds) R. M. Sorrentino and E. T. Higgins, New York: Guilford Press, 1986, pp. 204–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. “On the Power and Functionality of Attitudes: The Role of Attitude Accessibility,” in Attitude Structure and Function (eds) Anthony R. Pratkanis et al., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1989. 153–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gensch, D. and Recker, W. W. “The Multinomial, Multiattribute Logit Choice Model.” Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (February 1979), 124–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunert, K. “Research in Consumer Behaviour: Beyond Attitude and Decision Making.” Journal of the European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research, 16, 5 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunert, K. “Consumer Behaviour: Beyond Attitudes and Decision-making”, European Research: The Journal of the European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research, 16 (1989): 16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, R. I. and Case, P. B. “Testing Thirteen Attitude Scales for Agreement and Brand Discrimination,” Journal of Marketing, 43 (Fall 1979): 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, J. R. “Testing, Accuracy, Usefulness and Significance of Probabilistic Models: An Information Theoretic Approach,” Operations Research, 26 (May—June 1978): 406–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S. J. S. and Lutz, R. J. “Ask Not What the Brand Can Evoke: Ask What Can Evoke the Brand?” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 19 (eds) J. F. Sherry, Jr. and B. Sternthal, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 1992: 101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S. J. S. “Understanding Brand Awareness: Let Me Give You a C(I)ue!” in Advances in Consumer Research, 20, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research (1993): 383–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. A. Consumer Behaviour in Marketing Strategy, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linquist, J. D. “Measuring Image,” Journal of Retailing, 50 (Winter 1975): 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFief, W. C. and Hensel, P. H. “Outshopping and Hedonic Consumption,” American Marketing Association Summer Educators Conference Proceedings, Chicago: American Marketing Association (1991): 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, J. R., Hawes, J. M. and Darden, W. R. “Shopping Patterns of the Rural Consumer: Exploring the Relationship between Shopping Orientations and Outshopping,” Journal of Business Research, 14, 1 (1986): 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nedungadi, P. and Hutchinson, J. W. “The Prototypicality of Brands: Relationships with Brand Awareness, Preference and Usage,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 12 (eds) Elizabeth C. Hirschman and Morris B. Holbrook, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research (1985): 498–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedungadi, P. “Recall and Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice Without Altering Brand Evaluations,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (December 1990): 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, E. M. and Shoben, E. J. “The Effect of Context on the Structure of Categories,” Cognitive Psychology, 15, 4 (1983): 346–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiggle, S. and Sewall, M. A. “A Choice Sets Model of Retail Selection,” Journal of Marketing, 51, 2 (1987): 86–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tigert, D. J. “Comparative Analysis of Determinants of Patronage,” in Retail Patronage Theory 1981 Workshop Proceedings (ed.) Robert F. Lusch, Norman, OK: Centre for Economic and Management Research, School of Business Administration, The University of Oklahoma (1981): 118–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tigert, D. J. “Pushing the Hot Buttons for a Successful Retailing Strategy,” in Patronage Behaviour and Retail Management (eds) William R. Darden and Robert F. Lusch, New York, NY: North-Holland, 1983: 89–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tigert, D. J., Arnold, S. J., Powell, L. and Seiders, M. K. “Service, Service and Service: Why Nordstrom is So Successful,” in The Cutting Edge, Proceedings of the 1991 Symposium on Patronage Behaviour and Retail Strategy (eds) William R. Darden, Robert F. Lusch, and J. Barry Mason, Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University, 1991: 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, A. G. and Trappey III, R. J. “Incorporating Competition in Attitude-Accessibility Models of Customers’ Primary Store Choices,” in The Cutting Edge, Proceedings o f the 1991 Symposium on Patronage Behaviour and Retail Strategy (eds), William R. Darden, Robert F. Lusch, and J. Barry Mason, Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University, 1992: 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Randolph J. Trappey III and Arch Woodside

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trappey, R.J., Woodside, A.G. (2005). Automatic Thinking and Store Choices by Near and Distant Customers. In: Brand Choice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514201_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics