Skip to main content

Customer Thinking and Brand Choice

  • Chapter
Brand Choice

Abstract

Research on consumer automatic-unconscious and strategic-cognitive processes in associating brands with evaluative attributes (i.e., best quality; best value; slowest service) offer valuable tools for marketers wanting to understand the primary associations (i.e., the drivers) a brand owns in the minds of customers. A few such drivers connect to the brand that the consumer identifies as her primary choice. With the research methods described in this book, advertising and marketing strategists also learn which, if any, consumers retrieve their brand automatically-unconsciously in connection for important evaluative attributes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Colgate, M. and Stewart, K. “The challenge of relationships in services,” International Journal of Service Industry Management, 9, 5 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D. and Campbell, D. T. Quasi-experimentation. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H., Powell, M. C. and Williams, C. J. “The Role of Attitude Accessibility in the Attitude-to-Behaviour Process.” Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 4 (1989): 280–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, R. E., Emmert, J. and Hofacker, C. “A causal model of consumer involvement: replication and extension” Proceedings Winter EducatorsConference (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermanns, A. and Sauter, M. Management-Handbuch Electronic Commerce. Frankfurt: Verlag Vahlen, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S. J. S. “Understanding Brand Awareness: Let Me Give You a C(1)ue!” in Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 20, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research (1993): 383–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S. J. S. and Lutz, R. J. “Ask Not What the Brand Can Evoke: Ask What Can Evoke the Brand?” Advances in Consumer Research, 19, (eds) J. F. Sherry, Jr. and B. Sternthal, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research (1992): 101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. A. Consumer Behaviour in Marketing Strategy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahnemann, D. and Tversky, A. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica, 47 (March 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. “Conceptualising, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, 57, 1 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, B. and Lee, M. S. “A causal model of consumer involvement,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 10 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, S. and Collins, T. Maximarketing. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, A. G. “Modeling linkage-advertising: Going beyond better media comparisons.” Journal of Advertising Research, 34 (July/August), (1994): 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Randolph J. Trappey III and Arch Woodside

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trappey, R.J., Woodside, A.G. (2005). Customer Thinking and Brand Choice. In: Brand Choice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514201_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics