Skip to main content

Abstract

The John Lewis Partnership (JLP), one of the UK’s largest, oldest and most durably successful retailing groups, is an oddity. It is so different from its rivals (see box) that it seems very likely that its success is because of, rather than despite, its many distinctive features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. John Lewis Partnership website: www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk.

  2. The Constitution of the John Lewis Partnership; Introduction, Principles and Rules, April 2004, (2nd edn).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Integrative Management; Creating Unity from Diversity, Pauline Graham, Basil Blackwell, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mary Parker Follett, Prophet of Management: A Celebration of Writings from the 1920s, edited by Pauline Graham, Beard Books, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  5. In the company of women: complementary ways of organizing work, Carlotta Tyler, OD Practitioner, 34(3), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Business and The Feminine Principle, Carol R. Frenier, Butterworth Heinemann, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Red Queen. Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature, Matt Ridley, Viking, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. The Adapted Mind, Irwin Silverman and Marion Eals, Oxford University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Measure costs right: make the right decisions, Harvard Business Review, September-October 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reengineering the Corporation, Mike Hammer and James Champy, HarperCollins, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leadership & Gender: A Masculine Past; A Feminine Future? 2002, Beverly Alimo-Metcalfe, thematic paper for CERFE project. (CERFE is an independent research organization based in Rome).

    Google Scholar 

  12. General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Macmillan Cambridge University Press, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  13. If you’re not serving Bill and Barbara, then you’re not serving leadership, Mintzberg, H., in J.G. Hunt, U. Sekaran and C.A. Schriesheim (eds), Leadership Beyond Establishment Views, Southern Illinois University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Transformational, transactional and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men, A. H. Eagly, M. C. Johannesen-Schmidt and M. L. van Engen, Psychological Bulletin 2003, 129(4).

    Google Scholar 

  15. The transformational and transactional leadership of men and women, Bass, B.M., Avolio, B.J. and Atwater, L., Applied Psychology: An International Review, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Way Women and Men Lead, R. Kabacoff and H. Peters, Management Research Group, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Think manager — think male, V. E. Schein, The Atlanta Economic Review, March-April, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  18. The Partnering Imperative: Making Business Partnerships Work, Anne Deering and Anne Murphy, John Wiley, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A Practical Guide to Alliances, Booz Allen & Hamilton, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Peninah Thomson and Jacey Graham

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomson, P., Graham, J., Lloyd, T. (2005). A woman’s touch. In: A Woman’s Place is in the Boardroom. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514126_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics