Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Modern History ((SMH))

  • 24 Accesses

Abstract

The overall pattern to the popular protest of the occupation period is intriguing, and it tells us much about the relationship between the occupiers and the occupied, state and society, at this time. The first form of popular action taken was pillaging, in the weeks immediately following the German invasion. In fact, that is when pillaging was at its peak. It did not take long, however, for the population to begin the process of experimentation. Circumstances forced them to it. So we have seen, within months of the invasion, strikes, food riots and theft, as well as the establishment of the black market. As well, the resistance movements began to form at this time, and the first clandestine newspapers hit the streets by October 1940. And the harsh winter of 1940–1 was one of sweeping protest in a number of venues. This was the period in which the Germans were preoccupied with the war effort. After quickly subduing Western Europe, they had turned to the East, and in June 1941, invaded the Soviet Union. That invasion did not go well, and by January 1942, it was clear that the war was not going to end quickly. For northern France, this meant that the Germans were preoccupied elsewhere almost from the moment of occupation until January 1942. This preoccupation may well have contributed to an environment in which the populace felt secure enough to risk protesting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. John Sweets argues that, while the majority of the French population may not have been active members of organized resistance groups, their passive opposition to the Vichy regime and the Germans created a climate favourable to and supportive of resistance. Exclusion of these functional resisters from a definition of membership may lend greater precision, but ‘may prohibit an adequate appreciation of the phenomenon of resistance’. John Sweets, ‘Hold that Pendulum! Redefining Fascism, Collaborationism and Resistance in France’, French Historical Studies 15/4 (Autumn 1988) 754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Louise and Charles Tilly, Class Conflict and Collective Action (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1981), pp. 20–3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. John Bohstedt, Riots and Community Politics in England and Wales 1790–1810 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983). Bohstedt’s study was an examination of 617 riots of various kinds that occurred in England between 1790 and 1810. The focus of his attention, however, was on Devon food riots, political actions in Manchester and a broad sweep of rural disturbances, especially in Lincolnshire.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2000 Lynne Taylor

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taylor, L. (2000). Conclusion. In: Between Resistance and Collaboration. Studies in Modern History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230513976_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230513976_10

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40869-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-51397-6

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics