The Politics of Prosopopoeia: The Pandora Sonnets

  • Rosalind Smith
Part of the Early Modern Literature in History book series (EMLH)

Abstract

The previous chapters have analyzed the impact that two texts of disputed attribution had upon the field of early modern women’s writing, and most specifically upon women writers’ agency in the genre of the secular lyric. If these histories indicate surprising instances of textual innovation in the field of female writing in the 1560s and 1570s, they also indicate the problems of defining that field solely in terms of historical women writers and texts of secure attribution. Separating the categories of female authorship, female writing and female voice newly allows texts of uncertain attribution to be analyzed within the field of early modern women’s textual practice, reconfiguring its boundaries and altering the ways in which the feminine lyric agency in the genres of sonnet and complaint might be understood. Another such difficult text of uncertain attribution is a third collection of sonnets circulated in print in 1584 in John Soowthern’s Pandora and attributed in the text to Anne de Vere, Countess of Oxford, followed by a single sonnet attributed in the text to Elizabeth I.1 The recent critical history of this text exemplifies one set of difficulties that texts of problematic authorship cause in the field of early modern women’s writing: in this case, the consequences of strained and selective arguments for feminine attribution.

Keywords

Assure Burial Defend Editing Lost 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Ellen Moody, ‘Six Elegaic Poems, Possibly by Anne Cecil de Vere, Countess of Oxford’, ELR 19 (1989): 152–170.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Louise Schleiner, Tudor and Stuart Women Writers (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1994), 85–93.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Walker, Women Writers, 61–62; Nona Fienberg, ‘Mary Wroth’s poetics of the self’, SEL 42 (2002): 121–137.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Marion Wynne-Davies, sel. and ed., Women Poets of the Renaissance (London: J.M. Dent, 1998), 353–354.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    During a five-year estrangement from Oxford, Anne de Vere lived in her parental house until a reconciliation with her husband at the end of 1582. B.M. Ward, The Seventeenth Earl of Oxford: 1550–1604 (London: John Murray, 1928), 125–126.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    Dora and Erwin Panofsky, Pandora’s Box: The Changing Aspects of a Mythical Symbol (New York: Pantheon Books, 1956), 68.Google Scholar
  7. 12.
    Leicester Bradner, The Poems of Queen Elizabeth I (Providence, RI: Brown University Press, 1964), 76. The poem is not reproduced in the Marcus, Mueller and Rose edition of Elizabeth’s collected works.Google Scholar
  8. 13.
    Although the rhetorical figure of prosopopoeia is usually defined as a figure of speech in which inanimate objects or abstract ideas are endowed with human qualities or action, it occasionally is given a second definition as speech in character of impersonation. Here, however, I am also drawing upon Paul de Man’s use of the term in The Rhetoric of Romanticism as the ‘figure of prosopopoiea, the fiction of an apostrophe to an absent, deceased, or voiceless entity, which posits the possibility of the latter’s reply and confers upon it the power of speech… Prosopopoeia is the trope of autobiography, by which one’s name, as in a Milton poem, is made as intelligible and memorable as a face.’ Paul de Man, ‘Autobiography as De-Facement’, The Rhetoric of Romanticism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1984), 76.Google Scholar
  9. 14.
    Philippe Desportes, Cartels et Masquarades, Épitaphes (Geneva and Paris: Librairie Droz, 1958). All subsequent references are to this edition and page numbers are given in the text.Google Scholar
  10. 16.
    Philippe Desportes, Élégies (Geneva and Paris: Librairie Droz, 1961), 50.Google Scholar
  11. 18.
    George Puttenham, The Arte of English Poesie, ed. Gladys Doidge Wilcox and Alice Walker (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1936), 252–253.Google Scholar
  12. 19.
    Anne Lake Prescott, French Poets and the English Renaissance: Studies in Fame and Transformation (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1978), 102, 108.Google Scholar
  13. 20.
    Janet G. Scott, Les Sonnets Élisabéthains (Paris: Honoré Champion, 1929), 13.Google Scholar
  14. 21.
    Philippe Desportes, Les Amours de Diane (Geneva and Paris: Librairie Droz, 1959), 75.Google Scholar
  15. 29.
    Rosemary Kegl, “Those Terrible Aproches”: Sexuality, Social Mobility, and Resisting the Courtliness of Puttenham’s The Arte of English Poesie’, ELR 20 (1990): 198.Google Scholar
  16. 31.
    Léon van der Essen, Alexandre Farnèse, Prince de Parme, Gouverner Général des Pays Bas, 3 vols (Brussels: Librairie Nationale d’Art et d’Histoire, 1934), 3: 13–38.Google Scholar
  17. 32.
    Pieter Geyl, The Revolt of the Netherlands, 1555–1609 (London: Williams & Norgate, 1932), 183–184.Google Scholar
  18. 33.
    George Steevens to the editor, The European Magazine and London Review (June 1788), 389–391.Google Scholar
  19. 34.
    St John Chrysostome, An Exposition Upon the Epistle of S. Paule the Apostle to the Ephesians (London, 1581).Google Scholar
  20. 35.
    Nicholas Hemming, The Epistle of the Blessed Apostle Saint Paule, which he, in the Time of His Trouble and Imprisonment, Sent in Writing from Rome to the Ephesians, trans. Abraham Fleming (London, 1581).Google Scholar
  21. 36.
    John Brooke, A Christian Discourse upon Certeine Poynts of Religion (London, 1578), and Of Two Wonderful Popish Monsters, to wyt, Of a Popish Asse Which Was Found in Rome in the River Tyber (1496), and of a Monkish Calfe, Calved at Friberge in Misne (London, 1579).Google Scholar
  22. 37.
    Geoffrey Fenton, Golden Epistles (London, 1575).Google Scholar
  23. 38.
    Martyn Rody, From Revolt to Independence: The Netherlands 1550–1650 (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1990), 58–60.Google Scholar
  24. 39.
    Simon Adams, The Protestant Cause: Religious Alliance with the West European Calvinist Communities as a Political Issue in England, 1585–1630 (PhD diss., University of Oxford, 1972), 46–64.Google Scholar
  25. 42.
    George Puttenham, ‘Partheniades’ in Ancient Critical Essays upon English Poets and Poesy, ed. Joseph Haslewood, 2 vols (London: Robert Triphook, 1811–15), 1: xxx.Google Scholar
  26. 49.
    E.K. Chambers, Sir Henry Lee: An Elizabethan Portrait (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936), 155–156. The son was knighted by James I in 1607 for his military service, and was also a scholar translating the Greek histories of Polybius.Google Scholar
  27. Gwynneth Bowen, ‘Sir Edward Vere and His Mother, Anne Vavasour’, Shakespearean Authorship Review 15 (1966): 4, A letter from John Hampden to John Eliot, 1732, characterized Vere as ‘all summer in the field, all winter in his study; in whose fall fame makes this kingdom a great loser’.Google Scholar
  28. 55.
    Pamela S. Hammons, Poetic Resistance: English Women Writers and the Early Modern Lyric (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002), 28–32.Google Scholar
  29. 57.
    See Dennis Kay, Melodious Tears: The English Funeral Elegy from Spenser to Milton (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990), 6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rosalind Smith 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosalind Smith

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations