‘In a mirrour clere’: Anne Lock’s Miserere mei Deus as Admonitory Protestantism

  • Rosalind Smith
Part of the Early Modern Literature in History book series (EMLH)

Abstract

In 1560, Anne Lock published under her initials a translation of four of Calvin’s sermons on Isaiah 38, prefaced by a dedicatory epistle to Catherine Brandon and followed by a sonnet sequence, A Meditation of a Penitent Sinner: Written in the Maner of a Paraphrase upon the 51. Psalme of David. The Meditation consists of two parts: five sonnets ‘expressing the passioned minde of the penitent sinner’, followed by a longer sequence paraphrasing the 51st Psalm. It is an unsettling text in a number of ways. Generically anomalous, it contains the first sonnet sequence not only to be written in English, but also to combine the Petrarchan genre of sonnet sequence with psalm paraphrase. Unlike the texts of the circle of aristocratic women surrounding Catherine Parr, which form the major precedents for women’s publication in England before 1560, the text was compiled from the community of Protestant exiles in Geneva by a woman from a merchant family. Its strangeness disturbs some of the critical models applied to mid-sixteenth-century women’s writing, models that characterize women’s textual activity in terms of a restricted class of aristocratic authors, in a secondary or derivative relationship to male-authored texts, and generally confined to religious genres and topoi.

Keywords

Burning Assure Ghost Defend Editing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Elaine Beilin, Redeeming Eve: Women Writers of the English Renaissance (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987), 61–63;Google Scholar
  2. Margaret P. Hannay, ‘ “Strengthening the walles of… Ierusalem”: Anne Vaughan Lock’s Dedication to the Countess of Warwick’, ANQ 5 (1992): 71–75, and ‘ “Unlock my lippes”:Google Scholar
  3. The Miserere mei Deus of Anne Vaughan Lock and Mary Sidney Herbert, Countess of Pembroke’, in Privileging Gender in Early Modern England, ed. Jean R. Brink (Kirksville, Mo.: Sixteenth Century Journal Publishers, 1993), 18–36;Google Scholar
  4. Susanne Woods, ‘The Body Penitent: A 1560 Calvinist Sonnet Sequence’, ANQ 5 (1992): 137–140. Of these texts, only Margaret Hannay’s 1993 essay considers the attribution problems raised by the disclaimer, but she finds ‘internal evidence’ to link the sonnets and the dedication in a similarity of theme and in Lock’s own parallel of the songs of Hezekiah and David, and makes the attribution in the face of a lack of external evidence to the contrary. Hannay (1993), 21–22. This approach has been followed by almost all other critics in the field. There are two important exceptions.Google Scholar
  5. The first is Michael Spiller’s article, ‘A Literary “first”: The Sonnet Sequence of Anne Locke (1560)’, Renaissance Studies 11:1 (1997): 41–55, which discusses in detail the attribution to Locke in terms of its generic innovation, possible sources and alternative authors. Although he discusses the sonnets as ‘Locke’s poems’, he leaves open the possibility that they may have been composed by John Knox. The second is Roland Greene’s provocative and serious reading of the sonnets within English devotional tradition, discussed later in this chapter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Roland Greene, ‘Anne Lock’s Meditation: Invention Versus Dilation and the Founding of Puritan Poetics’, in Form and Reform in Renaissance England: Essays in Honor of Barbara Kiefer Lewalski, ed. Amy Boesky and Mary Thomas Crane (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2000), 153–170.Google Scholar
  7. 2.
    See, for example, Kel Morin Parson’s argument that the prefatory sonnets challenge prescriptions of feminine silence in the period by enacting the struggle of the subject to speak; despair’s oppressive presence is seen to be shadowed by that of patriarchal culture, and the poems become a manifesto for all Protestant subjects’ right to speak, regardless of gender. The unconvincing interchangeability of despair and patriarchy here force the text to conform to the agendas of liberal feminism; it is read primarily in terms of its status as women’s writing. Kel Morin-Parsons, ‘ “Thus crave I mercy”: The Preface of Anne Locke’, in Other Voices, Other Views: Expanding the Canon in English Renaissance Studies, ed. Helen Ostovich, Mary V. Silcox and Graham Roebuck (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1999), 280–284. At the other end of the spectrum, John Ottenhof’s article in the same volume gestures towards the text’s place in a devotional lyric tradition, but in trying to ‘validate this work’ through its formal competence and contribution to male-authored traditions, the article tends to reinforce the negative assumptions surrounding early modern women’s textuality that it tries to contest. John Ottenhof, ‘Mediating Anne Locke’s Meditation Sonnets’, Other Voices, 290–310.Google Scholar
  8. 3.
    See Susan M. Felch, ed., The Collected Works of Anne Vaughan Lock (Tempe, AZ: Renaissance English Text Society, 1999), xvi–xxxvi;Google Scholar
  9. and W.C. Richardson, Stephen Vaughan, Financial Agent of Henry VIII (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1953).Google Scholar
  10. 4.
    J. Meadows Cowper, ed., Complaynt of Roderyck Mors; and The Lamentacyon of a Christen agaynst the Cytye of London (London: N. TraüLbner and Co., 1874);Google Scholar
  11. Patrick Collinson, ‘The Role of Women in the English Reformation Illustrated by the Life and Friendships of Anne Locke’, Studies in Church History 2 (1965): 261–262; Richardson, Stephen Vaughan, 21–22.Google Scholar
  12. 5.
    Patrick Collinson, A Mirror of Elizabethan Puritanism: The Life and Letters of ‘Godly Master Dering’ (London: Dr. William’s Trust, 1964).Google Scholar
  13. 6.
    David Laing, ed., The Works of John Knox, 6 vols (Edinburgh: Bannatyne Society, 1846–64), 4: 219–241, 6: 11–101.Google Scholar
  14. See also Robert Louis Stevenson, ‘John Knox and His Relations to Women’, Familiar Studies of Men and Books (London: William Heinemann, 1924), 202–244;Google Scholar
  15. and Susan M. Felch, ‘ “Deir Sister”: The Letters of John Knox to Anne Vaughan Lok’, Renaissance and Reformation 19:4 (1995): 57–68.Google Scholar
  16. 7.
    Jean Calvin, Sermons on Isaiah’s Prophecy of the Death and Passion of Christ, trans, and ed. T.H.L. Parker (London: Clarke, 1956), 13–16. Calvin’s sermons on Isaiah are to be distinguished from his commentaries on Isaiah, published in French in 1552 and in Latin by Jean Crespin in 1551 and 1559, which the unattributed notes to the 1973 reprint of Lock’s text seem to suggest might have been Lock’s source for the sermons, although the wording is ambiguous and it is also suggested that ‘perhaps Mrs Locke heard the sermons herself & purchased a manuscript copy of this section’.Google Scholar
  17. Anne Lock, Mrs Lock’s Little Book (London: Olive Tree, 1973), 40.Google Scholar
  18. 8.
    Jean Calvin, Sermons de Jehan Calvin Sur le Cantique que fait le bon Roy Ezechias après qu’il eut este malade & afflige de la main de Dieu (Geneva, 1562).Google Scholar
  19. 10.
    Marcy North, The Anonymous Renaissance: Cultures of Discretion in Tudor-Stuart England (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2003), 215.Google Scholar
  20. 12.
    J.W. Saunders, The Profession of English Letters (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1964), 44; Wall, Imprint of Gender, 13.Google Scholar
  21. 13.
    Hyder Rollins, ed., Tottel’s Miscellany, 2 vols (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1965), 1: 2;Google Scholar
  22. Barnabe Googe, Eclogues, Epitaphs and Sonnets, ed. Judith M. Kennedy (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1989);Google Scholar
  23. Le Roy Merrill, ed., The Life and Poems of Nicholas Grimald (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1925), 100–102.Google Scholar
  24. 15.
    Catherine Parr, Prayers and Meditations (London, 1545), and The Lamentacion of a Sinner (London, 1547);Google Scholar
  25. Lady Elizabeth Fane, The Lady Elizabeth Fane’s 21 Psalms and 102 Proverbs (London, 1550);Google Scholar
  26. Elizabeth I, A Godly Meditation of the Soul (London, 1548). Although Elizabeth Fane’s text is now lost, it was described by George Ballard as ‘several psalms and pious meditations, and proverbs, in the English Tongue’.Google Scholar
  27. George Ballard, Memoirs of Several Ladies of Great Britain (London, 1752), 119.Google Scholar
  28. 16.
    However, Margaret Ezell’s work on seventeenth-century women poets issues a caveat against this sort of construction of disclaimers in women’s texts, arguing that they were less motivated by specifically gendered fears of social censure or critical response than by their participation in a rhetoric of modesty shared by writers of both sexes. Margaret J.M. Ezell, The Patriarch’s Wife: Literary Evidence and the History of the Family (Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press, 1987), 62–100.Google Scholar
  29. 18.
    Patrick Collinson makes the attribution tentatively, as ‘perhaps Knox’s work’; the notes to Mrs Lock’s Little Book, a reprint of the British Museum text of the sermons, makes the attribution more definitely: ‘No doubt the second item in Mrs Lock’s little book, “A meditation of a penitent sinner”, a metrical paraphrase of Psalm 51, was sent to her by Knox at the same time as the first.’ W. Stanford Reid’s biography of Knox, Trumpeter of God, follows Collinson’s more tentative position: ‘During her stay in Geneva, Mrs. Locke translated Calvin’s sermons on the song of Hezekiah which she published along with a poetical meditation on Psalm 51, possibly written by Knox himself.’ Patrick Collinson, ‘The Role of Women’, 265; Anne Lock, Mrs Lock’s Little Book (London: Olive Tree, 1973), 127;Google Scholar
  30. W. Stanford Reid, Trumpeter of God: A Biography of John Knox (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1974), 141.Google Scholar
  31. 19.
    Laing glosses the psalms published in Knox’s texts as ‘although sanctioned by Knox, they cannot be considered as forming any part of the Reformer’s works’. David Laing, ed., The Works of John Knox, 6 vols (Edinburgh: Bannatyne Society, 1846–64), 6: 284–285.Google Scholar
  32. 21.
    Jean Taffin, Des Marques des Enfans de Dieu (Harlem, 1588).Google Scholar
  33. 22.
    Taffin, Des Marques (1588), A2r, 159.Google Scholar
  34. 23.
    Taffin, Des Marques (1597), 1v.Google Scholar
  35. 24.
    Jean Taffin, De Merck-teeckenen der kinderen Godt, trans. Iacobvs Viverivs (Rotterdam, 1613), 54r-58r.Google Scholar
  36. 25.
    Anne Prowse, trans., Of the Markes of the Children of God (London, 1590). The second and third impressions were published in London in 1609 and 1615. The French edition is a re-issue of Taffin’s fourth edition (Saumur, 1601).Google Scholar
  37. 26.
    For an analysis of ‘The necessitie and benefite of affliction’ in its textual and cultural context, see Micheline White, ‘Renaissance Englishwomen and Religious Translations: The Case of Anne Lock’s Of the Markes of the Children of God (1590)’, ELR 29 (1999): 393–395.Google Scholar
  38. 27.
    Cambridge, MS Ii.5.37., fol. 5r. See Jane Stevenson, ‘Women, Writing and Scribal Publication in the Sixteenth Century’, English Manuscript Studies, 1100–1700 9 (2000): 1–32, who argues that the manuscript was compiled in support of Bartholo Silva, rather than Edward Dering, and was intended for the readership of Leicester and ultimately Queen Elizabeth (18–19).Google Scholar
  39. 28.
    Susan M. Felch, ‘ “Noble Gentlewomen Famous for their Learning”: The London Circle of Anne Vaughan Lock’, ANQ, 16:2 (2003): 14–19.Google Scholar
  40. 32.
    Rivkah Zim, English Metrical Psalms: Poetry as Praise and Prayer 1535–1601 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 82–104.Google Scholar
  41. 33.
    John N. King, English Reformation Literature: The Tudor Origins of the Protestant Tradition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982), 211.Google Scholar
  42. 34.
    The manuscript of the translation bears in a second hand, under the initials E.R., either ‘scr’, scriptus, or ‘sec’, secundus, referring to the text’s composition in the second year of Elizabeth’s reign; but whatever reading is made, the hand in which the poem was copied into the manuscript indicates that it was composed early in Elizabeth’s reign. Ruth Hughey, ed., The Arundel Harington Manuscript of Tudor Poetry (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1960), 456–457.Google Scholar
  43. 37.
    For a discussion of Marot’s formal innovation, see Michel Jeanneret, Poesie et Tradition Biblique au XVIe Siècle (Paris: J. Corti, 1969).Google Scholar
  44. 38.
    Henri-Léonard Bordier, Le Chansonnier Huguenot du XVIe Siècle (Paris: Libraire Tross, 1870), 367.Google Scholar
  45. 39.
    Terence Cave, Devotional Poetry in France, c. 1570–1613 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969), 97–99, 135–145.Google Scholar
  46. 40.
    For a full and clear critique of definitions of a feminine text, see Elizabeth Grosz, ‘Sexual Signatures: Feminism After the Death of the Author’, Space, Time and Perversion: The Politics of Bodies (London and New York: Routledge, 1995), 9–24.Google Scholar
  47. 43.
    Thomas Deloney, ‘The Dutches of Suffolkes Calamitie’, in The Works of Thomas Deloney, ed. Francis Oscar Mann (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1912), 393;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thomas Drue, The Life of the Dutches of Suffolke (London, 1631).Google Scholar
  49. 44.
    John Foxe, The Acts and Monuments of John Foxe, ed. Josiah Pratt, 8 vols (London: The Religious Tract Society, 1877), 8: 569.Google Scholar
  50. 45.
    For a discussion of the practice and parameters of such counsel, see A.N. McLaren, Political Culture in the Reign of Elizabeth I: Queen and Commonwealth 1558–1585 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 46–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 46.
    John Calvin, Letters of John Calvin Selected from the Bonnet Edition (Edinburgh and Carlisle, Pa.: Banner of Truth Trust, 1980), 207–208.Google Scholar
  52. 47.
    Wallace T. MacCaffrey, Elizabeth I (London and New York: Edward Arnold, 1993), 49–51;Google Scholar
  53. Norman L. Jones, Faith by Statute: Parliament and the Settlement of Religion, 1559 (London and New Jersey: Royal Historical Society, 1982), 9;Google Scholar
  54. Winthrop S. Hudson, The Cambridge Connection and the Elizabethan Settlement of 1559 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1980), 90–99, 131–137.Google Scholar
  55. 48.
    Patrick Collinson, ‘Windows in a Woman’s Soul: Questions about the Religion of Queen Elizabeth’, Elizabethan Essays (London: Hambledon Press, 1994), 87–110.Google Scholar
  56. 51.
    Margaret Aston, The King’s Bedpost: Reformation and Iconography in a Tudor Group Portrait (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 113–127.Google Scholar
  57. 54.
    Abraham Hartwell, (London, 1565) printed in J. Nichols, The Progresses and Public Processions of Queen Elizabeth, 3 vols (London: John Nichols & Son, 1788–1805), 1: 171.Google Scholar
  58. 56.
    Jean Calvin, Sermons de Jehan Caluin Sur le Cantique que fait le bon Roy Ezechias après qu’il eut este malade & afflige la main de Dieu (Geneva, 1562), 20.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Jane Donawerth describes this relationship in terms of a feminine economy of gift exchange; Lock’s box is a gift to be returned, ‘not only to God, Calvin, Lok, and the duchess, but also all “trewe beleiuyng Christians’ “. See ‘Women’s Poetry and the Tudor-Stuart System of Gift Exchange’, in Women, Writing and the Reproduction of Culture in Tudor and Stuart Britain, ed. Mary E. Burke et al. (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2000), 11.Google Scholar
  60. 63.
    Hyder Rollins, ed., Tottel’s Miscellany, 2 vols (Cambridge, Mass, and London: Harvard University Press, 1965), 2: 27, 206, 218.Google Scholar
  61. 64.
    R.A. Rebholz, Sir Thomas Wyatt: The Complete Poems (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1978), 206–209.Google Scholar
  62. 65.
    Suzanne Trill, ‘ “Speaking to God in his Phrase and Word”: Women’s Use of the Psalms in Early Modern England’, in The Nature of Religious Language: A Colloquium, ed. Stanley E. Porter (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1996), 273–277.Google Scholar
  63. 66.
    Carl J. Rasmussen, ‘ “Quietnesse of Minde”: A Theatre for Worldlings as Protestant Poetics’, Spenser Studies 1 (1980): 3–27.Google Scholar
  64. 72.
    Rebholz, Works, 209; Clement Marot, Oeuvres (Paris, 1551), 357r.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rosalind Smith 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosalind Smith

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations