Abstract
Although the Syferfontein war plan had failed, the Boers nevertheless still intended to implement it one way or another. After March 1901 there was, however, no opportunity to do so and the Boers had to concentrate on small-scale guerrilla warfare. In May 1901 de Wet wrote to Commandant Kritzinger, who was still in the Cape Colony: ‘Here, [as] in [the] Transvaal skirmishes still regularly occur, although no large battles. Nevertheless the losses of the enemy continue much as earlier. Railways are being destroyed more than ever, as are trains being derailed’.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
de Wet, De Strijd tusschen Boer en Brit [The Struggle between Boer and Briton], pp. 300–301 (Reitz — Steyn, 10 May 1901).
Cf. Leopold Scholtz, ‘Die Slag van Bakenlaagte, 30 Oktober 1901’ [The Battle of Bakenlaagte, 30 October 1901]. (Historia, 19(1), May 1974).
Cf. Scholtz, ‘Die Slag van Bakenlaagte’ [The Battle of Bakenlaagte] (Historia, 19(1), May 1974, p. 63).
A.P.J. van Rensburg, ‘Die Ekonomiese Herstel van die Afrikaner in die Oranjerivier-Kolonie, 1902–1907’ [The Economic Recovery of the Afrikaner in the Orange River Colony, 1902–1907] (Archives Yearbook for South African History, 1967, II, p. 168).
G. Arthur, Life of Lord Kitchener, II, p. 57 (Kitchener — Roberts, 13 December 1901). During January 1902 he thought the war would be over in July. Vide Spies, Methods of Barbarism?, p. 281
Copyright information
© 2005 Leopold Scholtz
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scholtz, L. (2005). Guerrilla Warfare: The Second Phase. In: Why the Boers Lost the War. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230513310_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230513310_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52518-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-51331-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)