Advertisement

The Contribution of (Large, ‘Western’) Multinationals to The Catching-up of (Small, ‘Eastern’) Countries

Chapter
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

The opening up of Eastern Europe has brought with it an influx of foreign capital in the form of foreign direct investment (FDI), most of which is market-oriented, whilst some of it is cost-oriented. Some of the more advanced Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs) are small (e.g. Czech Republic, Slovenia, Slovakia, Croatia, the Baltic states) and view the investments of multinational companies (MNCs) as being ‘engines of growth’, based on the experience of the small European nations after World War II (e.g. Bellak 1998). In general, ‘the linkages between development and MNC involvement have tended to become closer and less avoidable as economic activity has become more globalized.’ (Cantwell 1997:167; see also Sally, 1995; Bellak and Cantwell, 1998) Normally, the theoretical assumption prevails that both parties, i.e. both MNCs and small CEECs, will benefit from this process of ‘interactive transition assisted by MNCs’ (Ozawa 1992) and the catalytic role of inward FDI. Catching-up involves three phases (cf. Barta and Url, 1996), namely adjustment, restmcturing and growth. In accordance with these phases, the contribution of inward FDI varies over time (Donges and Wieners, 1994: 129): Whereas, in the short run it secures the survival of existing firms, in the medium-term it helps to rebuild the largely obsolescent capital stock (by replacing the depreciated stock of fixed capital) and generates growth in the long run.

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment Transaction Cost Comparative Advantage Small Country Intangible Asset 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AHARONI Y. and HIRSCH S. (1993): ‘Enhancing the Competitive Advantage of Developing Countries in Technology-Intensive Industries: A Conceptual Scheme and Policy Implications’. Working Paper, No. 1, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  2. ANTONELLI C. (1996): ‘Localised Technological Change and Schumpeterian Growth Regimes’. The Manchester School, Vol. LXIV, No. 4, December, pp. 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BALASUBRAMANYAM V.N., SAPSFORD D. and SALISU M.A. (1994): ‘Foreign Direct Investment and Growth’. Discussion Paper EC 13, Lancaster University.Google Scholar
  4. BARTA V. and URL T. (1996): ‘Migration, Free Trade and Regional Integration in Central and Eastern Europe, Seminar Paper on‘Economies in Transition: Long-term Growth Potential, Capital Accumulation and Labour-Capital Substitutability in Five Central European Countries’’ DEELSA/ELSA/MI(96)4, Vienna.Google Scholar
  5. BELL M. and PAVITT K. (1997): ‘Technological accumulation and industrial growth: contrasts between developed and developing countries’. In: ARCHIBUGI, D. and MOUE, J. (eds) Technology, globalisation and economic performance, Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–137.Google Scholar
  6. BELLAK C. (1997a): ‘Reeling in the transnationals.’ New Economy, January, 1997, pp. 17–21.Google Scholar
  7. BELLAK C. (1997b): ‘The (Im-)Mobility of Multinational Enterprises — A Conceptual Scheme. In: Internationalization and Foreign Direct Investment Behaviour in OECD and Asian Countries’, Proceedings of the 4th Workshop in International Business: University of Vaasa, pp. 232–249.Google Scholar
  8. BELLAK C. (1998): ‘Lessons from Austria’s post-war pattern of inward FDI for CEECs.’ WIIW Research Reports, No. 251, November.Google Scholar
  9. BELLAK C. and CANTWELL J.A. (1998): ‘Globalisation tendencies relevant for latecomers: Some conceptual issues’. In: L. Tsipouri, M. Storper and S. Thomadakis (eds), Industrial Policies for Latecomers, Routledge, pp. 40–75.Google Scholar
  10. BLOMSTRÖM M. and KOKKO A. (1998): ‘Multinational Corporations and Spillovers.’ Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 250–277.Google Scholar
  11. BORENSZTEINS E., De GREGORIO J. and LEED J.W. (1995): ‘How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth?’, NBER Working Paper, No. 5057.Google Scholar
  12. CANTWELL J. A. (1990): ‘The Technological Competence Theory of International Production and its Implications’. Discussion Papers in International Investment and Business Studies, No. 149, University of Reading.Google Scholar
  13. CANTWELL J.A. (1997): ‘Globalisation and Development in Africa’. In: DUNNING, J.H. AND HAMDANI, K.A. (eds) The New Globalism and Developing Countries, United Nations University Press: Tokyo et al., pp. 155–179.Google Scholar
  14. CASTELLO S. and OZAWA T. (1994): ‘Globalisation of Small Economies as a Strategy Behaviour: A Conceptual Exploration of Key Propositions’. Paper presented at the 4th ITFA Conference, Reading, UK.Google Scholar
  15. DONGES J.B. and WIENERS J. (1994): ‘Foreign investment in Eastern Europe’s transformation process’. In: BALASUBRAMANYAM, V.N. and SAPSFORD, D. (eds) The Economics of International Investment, pp. 129–141.Google Scholar
  16. DUNNING J.H. (1994): ‘Re-evaluating the Benefits of Foreign Direct Investment’. Discussion Papers in International Investment & Business Studies, No. 188, University of Reading.Google Scholar
  17. DUNNING J.H. (1996a): ‘Globalisation, Technological Change and the Spatial Organisation of Economic Activity’. Discussion Papers in International Investment & Business Studies, No. 211, University of Reading.Google Scholar
  18. DUNNING J.H. (1996b): ‘Governments and the Macro-Organisation of Economic Activity: An Historical and Spatial Perspective’. Discussion Papers in Economics and Management, No. 352, University of Reading.Google Scholar
  19. DUNNING J.H. and NARULA R. (1996): ‘The investment development path revisited.’ In: Dunning and Narula (eds) Foreign Direct Investment and Governments, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
  20. ENDERWICK P. (1989): ‘Multinational Corporate Restructuring and International Competitiveness.’ California Management Review, Fall, pp. 44–58.Google Scholar
  21. HUNYA G. (1996): ‘Migration, Free Trade and Regional Integration in Central and Eastern Europe.’ Seminar Paper on ‘Foreign Direct Investment and their Employment Effects in Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic’ DEELSA/ELSA/MI(96)6, Vienna.Google Scholar
  22. HUNYA G. (1997): ‘Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Modernisation in CEECs.’ A study commissioned by Bank Austria, Vienna.Google Scholar
  23. HYMER, S. (1970): ‘a’ American Economic Review, May, pp. 441–448.Google Scholar
  24. KNELL M. (1997): Innovation and Growth after Systemic Change: Is Eastern Europe Catching Up? mimeo.Google Scholar
  25. LANDESMANN M. (1995): ‘The Pattern of East-West European Integration: Catching Up or Falling Behind?’ WIIW Comparative Economic Studies, No. 212, January, Vienna.Google Scholar
  26. LANDESMANN M. (1996): ‘Migration, Free Trade and Regional Integration in Central and Eastern Europe. Seminar Paper on ‘Emerging Patterns’ of European Industrial Specialisation: Implications for Trade Structures, Foreign Direct Investment and Migration Flows’, DEELSA/ELSA/MI(96)3, Vienna.Google Scholar
  27. LANDESMANN M. and SZEKELY I.P. (1995): ‘Industrial structural change in Central and Eastern European economies’. In: LANDESMANN, SZEKELY (eds) Industrial restructuring and trade reorientation in Eastern Europe, Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–75.Google Scholar
  28. LÉMAINE F. (1997): ‘Integrating Central/Eastern Europe in the European Trade and Production Networks’. Background Paper, presented at the Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Vienna, June 5–6.Google Scholar
  29. MARKUSEN J.R. (1995): ‘The Boundaries of Multinational Enterprises and the Theory of International Trade.’ The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9, No. 2, Spring, pp. 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MORAN T.H. (1996): ‘Governments and Transnational Corporations.’ In UNCTAD (ed.) Transnational Corporations and World Development, London: International Thomson Business Press, pp. 418–447.Google Scholar
  31. MUCCHIELLI J.-L. and SAUCIER P. (1997): ‘European industrial relocations in low-wage countries: policy and theory debates.’ In: BUCKLEY, P.J. and MUCCHIELLI, J.L. (eds) Multinational Firnis and International Relocation, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, pp. 5–33.Google Scholar
  32. NARULA R. and DUNNING J.H. (1998): Globalisation and New Realities for Multinational Enterprise — Developing Host Country Interaction, mimeo.Google Scholar
  33. NELSON R.R. (1991): ‘Why Do Firms Differ, And How Does It Matter?’ Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, pp. 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. OZAWA T. (1992): ‘Foreign direct investment and economic development.’ Transnational Corporations, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 27–54.Google Scholar
  35. REGER G. (1998): ‘Changes in the R&D Strategies of Transnational Finns: Challenges for National Technology and Innovation Policy.’ STI Review, No. 22, Special Issue on ‘New Rationale and Approaches in Technology and Innovation Policy’, OECD: Paris, pp. 243–276.Google Scholar
  36. RODRIGUEZ-CLARE, A. (1996): ‘Multinationals, Linkages, and Economic Development.’ American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 4, September, pp. 852–873.Google Scholar
  37. ROBINSON E.A.G., ed. (1963): ‘Economic Consequences of the Size of Nations’. Proceedings of a Conference held by the International Economic Associations: London, MacMillan.Google Scholar
  38. ROJEC M. and SVETLIČIČ M. (1993): ‘Foreign direct investment in Slovenia’ Transnational Corporations, Vol. 2, No. 2, February, pp. 135–151.Google Scholar
  39. ROTHSCHILD K.W. (1963): ‘Kleinstaat und Integration.’ Review of World Economics, Vol. XC, pp. 239–275.Google Scholar
  40. RUIGROK W. and van Tulder, R. (1995): The Logic of International Restructuring. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. SALLY R. (1995): States and Firms: Multinational Enterprises in Institutional Competition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. STOPFORD J.M. (1994): ‘The growing interdependence between transnational corporations and Governments.’ Transnational Corporations, Vol. 3, No. 1, February, pp. 53–76.Google Scholar
  43. STOPFORD J.M. and STRANGE S. with HENLEY J.S. (1991): ‘Rival states, rival firms: Competition for world market shares.’ Cambridge Studies in International Relations: 18, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. STREETEN P. (1992): ‘Interdependence and integration of the world economy: the role of States and firms.’ Transnational Corporations, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 125–136.Google Scholar
  45. UNCTAD (1994): World Investment Report. New York and Geneva: UNCTAD.Google Scholar
  46. WALSH V. (1988): ‘Technology and the Competitiveness of Small Countries: Review’. In Freeman, C., Lundvall, B.A. (eds), Small Countries Facing the Technological Revolution. Pinter Publishers: London, pp. 36–66.Google Scholar
  47. ZEMPLINEROVA A. (1997): ‘The Role of Foreign Enterprises in the Privatisation and Restmcturing of the Czech Economy’. WIIW Research Reports, No. 238, June, Vienna.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Christian Bellak 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of EconomicsViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations