Skip to main content

Resolving the Hopi-Navajo Land Dispute: Official and Unofficial Interventions

  • Chapter
Theory and Practice in Ethnic Conflict Management

Part of the book series: Ethnic and Intercommunity Conflict Series ((EAI))

  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

All serious ethnic conflicts involve both competing interests and threatened identities. This chapter examines a complicated long-term land conflict between the Hopi and Navajo, two sovereign native American nations. The problem, d’Estrée argues, is that the conflict is not only about land, but also the identities of two peoples already coping with the impact of American conquest and the delineation of tribal reservations in the late-nineteenth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aberle, D. E and Clemmer, R. O. (1994) ‘Mediation and Relocation: 1993 Report of the Navajo-Hopi Land Dispute’, Anthropology Newsletter, 35(1), pp. 6–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aberle, D. F. and Clemmer, R. O. (1995) ‘Inching Forward: 10th and Final Report of the AAA Committee on the Navajo-Hopi Land Dispute’, Anthropology Newsletter, 36, p. 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1954) The Nature Of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbitt, E. and d’Estrée, T. P. (1996) An Israeli-Palestinian Women’s Workshop: Application of the Interactive Problem-Solving Approach’. In Chester Crocker et al. (eds), Managing Global Chaos: Sources Of And Responses To International Conflict. Washington, DC: U.S Institute of Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedek, E. (1992) The Wind Won’t Know Me: A History Of The Navajo-Hopi Land Dispute. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugge, D. M. (1994) The Navajo-Hopi Land Dispute: An American Tragedy. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. W (1969) Conflict And Communication: The Use Of Controlled Communication in International Relations. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, R. A. B. and Folger, Joseph P. (1994) The Promise Of Mediation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. W (1984) ‘The 1954 Social Science Statement and School Desegregation: A Reply to Gerard’, American Psychologist, 39, pp. 819–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Estrée, T. P. (forthcoming, a) ‘Learning What to Say to Resolve Conflict: Intergroup Interaction in a Workshop Setting’. Unpublished manuscript; under revision for Journal of Language and Social Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Estrée, T. P. (forthcoming, b) ‘Underlying Concerns In The Hopi-Navajo Land Dispute: Clues From Unofficial Intergroup Dialogue’. Manuscript in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Estrée, T. P. and Babbitt, E. (in press) ‘Women and the Art of Peacemaking: Data from Israeli-Palestinian Problem-Solving Workshops. Political Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. and McDonald, J. (1991) Multi-track Diplomacy: A Systems Guide and Analysis. Grinnell, IA: Iowa Peace Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doob, L. W and Foltz, W. J. (1973) ‘The Belfast Workshop: An Application of Group Techniques to a Destructive Conflict’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 17, 489–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havens, W M. (1995) Dynamics Of The Hopi-Navajo Land Dispute: Concepts Of Colonialism And Manifest Destiny In The Southwest’. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, E., Karlstrom, K., Pascoe, J. and Spence, A. (1992) Hopis and Navajos: Understanding Their Land Disputes. Arizona Area Program Committee, American Friends Service Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (1972) ‘The Problem-Solving Workshop In Conflict Resolution’. In Richard L. Merritt (ed.), Communication In International Politics Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 168–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (1986) ‘Interactive Problem-solving: A Social-psychological Approach to Conflict Resolution’. In W. Klassen (ed.), Dialogue Toward Interfaith Understanding. Tantur/Jerusalem: Ecumenical Institute for Theological Research, pp. 293–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (1992) ‘Informal Mediation by the Scholar/Practitioner’. In Jacob Bercovitch and Jeffrey Z. Rubin (eds), Mediation in International Relations: Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management. New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (1995) ‘Contributions of an Unofficial Conflict Resolution Effort to the Israeli-Palestinian breakthrough’, Negotiation Journal, 11, pp. 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (1996) ‘Group Processes In The Resolution Of International Conflict’. American Psychologist, 52, pp. 212–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, M. M. (1997) Avoidance Strategies in Northern Ireland’. In D. P. Fry and K. Bjorkqvist (eds), Cultural Variation In Conflict Resolution: Alternatives To Violence. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montville, J. (1987) ‘The Arrow And The Olive Branch: A Case For Track Two Diplomacy’. In J. W. McDonald, Jr and D. B. Bendahmane (eds), Conflict Resolution: Track Two Diplomacy. Washington, DC: Foreign Service Institute, US Department of State.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, T. (1990) ‘“Symbolic Gestures” In Intergroup Conflict Resolution: Addressing Group Identity’. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Marc Howard (1993) The Management of Conflict: Interpretations and Interests in Comparative Perspective. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouhana, N. N. and Kelman, H. C. (1994) ‘Promoting Joint Thinking In International Conflicts: An Israeli-Palestinian Continuing Workshop’, Journal of Social Issues, 50, pp. 157–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. Z., Pruitt, D. G. and Kim, S. H. (1994) Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement (2nd edn). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharoni, S. (1995) Gender and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1958) ‘Superordinate Goals In The Reduction Of Intergroup Conflict’, American Journal of Sociology, 63, pp. 299–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, W. G. (1987) ‘The Contact Hypothesis In Intergroup Relations’. In C. Hendrick (ed.), Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 13–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

d’Estree, T.P. (1999). Resolving the Hopi-Navajo Land Dispute: Official and Unofficial Interventions. In: Ross, M.H., Rothman, J. (eds) Theory and Practice in Ethnic Conflict Management. Ethnic and Intercommunity Conflict Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230513082_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics