Abstract
Richard Morris Titmuss was appointed Professor of Social Administration at the London School of Economics in 1950. He was not the architect of the modern British social services state, but he soon made himself its ideologue, although as much its critic as its advocate. His impact on the intellectual underpinnings of welfare and society in the complacent and consensual Britain that came in with Attlee and Bevan and went out with the Thatcherites and the Monetarists simply cannot be underestimated. In the words of Ann Oakley:
The post-war period was a brave new world to many. It was one with which Richard Titmuss was intimately associated. He influenced the manner in which the welfare state evolved and was understood, not only in Britain, but as a model to be emulated and improved on by other countries. The Labour Party in the 1950s, ’60s and ’70s, particularly its social security and pension plans, would not have been the same without him.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
A. Oakley, Man and Wife: Richard and Kay Titmuss (London: HarperCollins, 1996, p. 2).
R. Pinker, Preface to D.A. Reisman, Richard Titmuss: Welfare and Society, first edn (London: Heinemann Educational Books, 1977), p. vii.
D. Donnison, ‘Richard Titmuss’, New Society, Vol. 24, 12 April 1973, p. 81.
B. Abel-Smith and Kay Titmuss, Preface to their The Philosophy of Welfare: Selected Writings of Richard M. Titmuss (London: Allen and Unwin, 1987), p. xii.
H. Rose, ‘Rereading Titmuss: The Sexual Division of Welfare’, Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 10, 1981, p. 478.
P. Wilding, ‘Titmuss’, in V. George and R. Page, eds., Modern Thinkers on Welfare (London: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1995), p. 156.
P. Wilding, ‘Richard Titmuss and Social Welfare’, Social and Economic Administration, Vol. 10, 1976, p. 149.
R. Mishra, The Welfare State in Crisis (Brighton: Harvester, 1984), p. 131.
A. Oakley, Taking it like a Woman (London: Jonathan Cape, 1984), p. 6.
M. Gowing, ‘Richard Morris Titmuss’, Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. LXI, 1975, p. 29.
F. Galton, Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development (London: Macmillan, 1883), p. 241.
R.H. Tawney, Equality (1931), 4th edn (London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd, 1964), p. 43.
R.M. Titmuss, ‘The End of Economic Parenthood’, New Statesman and Nation, 9 August 1941, p. 130.
R.H. Tawney, The Acquisitive Society (1921) (London: Collins, 1961), p. 48.
R.H. Tawney, ‘Poverty as an Industrial Problem’ (1913), in R.H. Tawney, The American Labour Movement and Other Essays, ed. by J.M. Winter (Brighton: Harvester, 1979), p. 112.
W.K. Hancock, Country and Calling (London: Faber and Faber, 1954), p. 194.
Copyright information
© 2001 David Reisman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reisman, D. (2001). Introduction. In: Richard Titmuss. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230512917_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230512917_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42059-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-51291-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)