Abstract
If questioned about their leisure activities today, many would cite as their main choice watching TV or reading. Despite decades of egalitarian talk and theory, these still indicate a social division: whether or not they are frequent readers, most would consider reading to be respectable use of leisure time and TV watching to be very slightly shameful. Leisure TV seems to identify people as having ordinary interests, being unimaginative, even uncultured. This perception is interesting. People lament growing illiteracy, but still reading has not become tarnished or downgraded in the public eye; and certainly, the mass production and retail of books is one of the great commercial success stories of the twentieth century. Most people still value reading as an ability. It remains a key to social status as well as a central leisure activity — and big business.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Martyn Lyons ‘New Readers in the Nineteenth Century’ in Guglielmo Cavallo and Roger Chartier (eds) A History of Reading in the West (Cambridge: Polity, 1999).
See, eg., Timothy Chappell Understanding Human Goods (Oxford: Edinburgh University Press, 1998), Ch. 4.
See, for example, Hildred Redfern Questions in Aesthetic Education (London: Allen and Unwin, 1986).
Alberto Manguel A History of Reading (London: HarperCollins, 1996), p. 189.
Timothy Radcliffe ‘Tradition and Creativity: the Paradigm of the New Testament’, New Blackfriars 70, 1989, p. 59.
T. S. Eliot ‘Tradition and the Individual Talent’, in Selected Essays (London: Harcourt, 1950).
Harold Bloom The Western Canon (London: Macmillan, 1994).
See Raimond Gaita ‘Truth As A Need of the Soul’ in A Common Humanity: thinking about love and truth and justice (Melbourne: Text, 1999).
An excellent contribution here is Hubert Dreyfus On the Internet (London: Routledge, 2001) who argues powerfully that increasing exposure to the Net means losing our sense of what is truly relevant, and so increasing our incapacity to identify what we need to know. Dreyfus also argues that the sense of invulnerability and of independence the Net gives disables our impulses towards risk-taking and apprenticeship and so undermines our capacity to learn.
For an even-handed treatment, see Gordon Graham The Internet: a philosophical enquiry (London: Routledge, 1999).
Gilbert Meilander ‘It Killed the Cat: the vice of curiosity’ in The Theory and Practice of Virtue (Notre Dame IN: Notre Dame University Press, 1984).
Copyright information
© 2005 Hayden Ramsay
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ramsay, H. (2005). Playing by the Book. In: Reclaiming Leisure. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230512825_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230512825_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52405-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-51282-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)