Abstract
Despite persuasive feminist arguments and considerable evidence to the contrary, the idea that men and women have different emotional make-ups and dispositions, and that this difference is ‘natural’ and universal, endures in many contemporary societies. This assumption informs many policies and practices in the ‘public’ sphere, including in schools and workplaces, and shapes people’s views and conduct in the most ‘private’, ‘intimate’ aspects of their lives. This book has reviewed just some prevailing gender-emotion associations and how they may shape the experiences of individual men and women. Whether in the institutions of the military, the theatres of war, the spheres of love, intimacy and sex, or the workplace, men and women are seen to be constituted in ways that make certain patterns of conduct and problems seem inevitable. However, it has become increasingly apparent that these associations are neither permanent nor universal. The significance of emotion for definitions of masculinity and femininity and for how men and women perceive and conduct themselves may vary considerably through time and across contexts. To use dramaturgical language, both the gender scripts, and how men and women enact those scripts, are diverse. Men and women may express and conduct themselves in ways which, from a contemporary Western standpoint, are deemed to be non gender-typical.
By nature, a man is suspicious, competitive, controlled, defensive and a loner who hides his emotional state to stay in control. For men, becoming emotional is seen as being out of control … As a nest-defender, a woman’s brain is pre-wired to be open, trusting, co-operative, show vulnerability, reveal emotions and know it’s not necessary to stay in control all the time. This is why a man and woman encounter problems together, each is confused about the other’s reaction.
— Pease and Pease (2001)
We all value social relationships, but are there differences in what each sex values about other people? Women tend to value the development of altruistic, reciprocal relationships. Such relationships require good empathizing skills. In contrast, men tend to value power, politics and competition. This pattern is found across widely different cultures and historical periods, and is even found among chimpanzees.
— Baron-Cohen (2003)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Alan Petersen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Petersen, A. (2004). Gender, ‘Emotional Literacy’, and the Future. In: Engendering Emotions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230512610_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230512610_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43266-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-51261-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)