Future Roles for UNMOVIC and its Expertise

  • Graham S. Pearson
Part of the Global Issues Series book series (GLOISS)

Abstract

UNMOVIC currently exists as a small and effective headquarters organization with chemical, biological, missiles and multidisciplinary capabilities together with a roster of trained and qualified inspectors. Its annual cost is in the region of US$ 10 to 15 million a year. It is not currently engaged in activities within Iraq and its staff are now analyzing the information that it holds both from UNSCOM as well as from monitoring developments, using commercial satellite imagery, at sites in Iraq known previously to have had dualuse equipment and maintaining a state of readiness to resume operations in Iraq at such time as the Security Council decides that it should do so. It is consequently timely to consider what future role might be under-taken by UNMOVIC or by its expertise and capabilities. There are a number of different alternatives which are explored below.

Keywords

Syria Assure Turkey Reso Egypt 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    United Nations Security Council, 4987th meeting, S/PV.4987 8 June 2004. Available at http://www.un.org/Depts/dhl/resguide/scact2004.htm.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    US Department of State, Redirection of Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Experts, Press Statement, 18 December 2003. Available at http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2003/27408.htm Google Scholar
  3. See also, US Department of State, Redirection of Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Experts Short-term Programme, Fact Sheet, 18 December 2003. Available at http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2003/27409.htm.Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    United Nations General Assembly, Resolution A/Res/58/34 Establishment of a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the region of the Middle East, A/Res/58/34, 19 December 2003. Available at http://www.un.org/Depts/dhl/resguide/r58.htm.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    United Nations General Assembly, Resolution A/Res/58/68 The risk of nuclear proli feration in the Middle East, A/Res/58/68, 19 December 2003. Available at http://www.un.org/Depts/dhl/resguide/r58.htm.Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    Mohamed ElBareidi and Joseph Rotblat, Time is Ripe to Act on Middle East Weapons, Financial Times, 3 February 2004. Available at http://www.acronym.org.uk/docs/0402/doc01.htm.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    It is unfortunate that Israel and the United States abstained from the Geneva Assembly resolution calling upon all States Parties to the 1925 Geneva Protocol to withdraw any remaining reservations. United Nations General Assembly, Resolution A/Res/57/62. Measures to uphold the authority of the 1925 Geneva Protocol, A/Res/57/62 30 December 2002. Available at http://www.un.org/Depts/dhl/resguide/r57.htm.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    United Nations General Assembly, Chemical and bacteriological (biological) weapons, Report by the Secretary-General, A/44/561, 4 October 1989.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    See, for example, Nicholas A. Sims, The Case for a BWC Committee of Oversight: Draft Commentary and Mandate, Disarmament Diplomacy 60, September 2001, pp. 13–9Google Scholar
  10. and Nicholas A. Sims, Organizational aspects with regard to possible verification measures under the Biological Weapons Convention, in S. J. Lundin (ed.), Views on Possible Verification Measures for the Biological Weapons Convention, SIPRI Chemical & Biological Warfare Studies No. 12, Oxford: OUP, 1991, pp. 37–48.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    United States Department of State, Missile Technology Control Regime, Fact Sheet, 2 August 2004. Available at http://www.state.gov/t/np/rls/fs/27514.htm.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    United Nations General Assembly, Fiftyfifth session, 69th Plenary Meeting, A/55/PV.69, 20 November 2004. Available at http://www.un.org/Depts/dhl/resguide/r55.htm.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    United Nations General Assembly, Resolution A/Res/55/33 General and Complete Disarmament A Missiles, A/Res/55/33, 12 January 2001. Available at http://www.un.org/Depts/dhl/resguide/r55.htm.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    United Nations General Assembly, The issue of missiles in all its aspects, Report by the Secretary-General, A/57/229, 23 July 2002.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    United Nations General Assembly, Resolution A/Res/58/37. Missiles, A/Res/58/37, 17 December 2003. Available at http://www.un.org/Depts/dhl/resguide/r58.htm.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    United Nations Security Council, Resolution 1540(2004) Adopted by the Security Council at its 4956th meeting, on 28 April 2004, S/RES/1540 (2004), 28 April 2004. Available at http://www.un.org/Depts/dhl/resguide/scact2004.htm.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Graham S. Pearson 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham S. Pearson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BradfordUK

Personalised recommendations