Advertisement

Dickens Breaks Out: the Public Readings and Little Dorrit

  • David Payne
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Nineteenth-Century Writing and Culture book series (PNWC)

Abstract

In the 1857 essay entitled “On the Modern Element in Literature,” Matthew Arnold identified two essential qualities of his own mid-century: the abundance, both material and theoretical, of its “copious and complex present”; and the state of “bafflement” in which the beneficiaries of this abundance lived. Speaking this longstanding contradiction — between modernity’s power to liberate people from the positions and dispositions to which they were born and the radical contingency and uncertainty this liberation brings — makes news to this day, as when the political scientist Robert E. Lane informs us that the affluent citizens of today’s “market democracies” are substantially less happy than most of their predecessors and contemporaries.1

Keywords

Literary History Freeze Deep Public Reading Market Democracy Household Word 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Matthew Arnold, “On the Modern Element in Literature” (1857), Macmillan’s Magazine 19 (February 1869): 304–14,Google Scholar
  2. rpr. in R. H. Super, ed., The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1968), 1: 18–37, 20;Google Scholar
  3. Robert E. Lane, The Loss of Happiness in Market Democracies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    After Lionel Trilling, “Little Dorrit“ (1953), rpr. in The Opposing Self: Nine Essays in Criticism (New York: Viking, 1955),Google Scholar
  5. see, e.g., J. Hillis Miller, Charles Dickens: the World of His Novels (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1958), 246;Google Scholar
  6. Edwin Eigner, The Metaphysical Novel in England and America: Dickens, Bulwer, Melville, and Hawthorne (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978), 116;Google Scholar
  7. Avrom Fleishman, “Master and Servant in Little Dorrit,” in Fiction and the Ways of Knowing: Essays on British Novels (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1978), 73;Google Scholar
  8. Peter Garrett, The Victorian Multiplot Novel: Studies in Dialogical Form (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980), 45, 84–5.Google Scholar
  9. 7.
    William Myers, “The Radicalism of Little Dorrit,” in John Lucas, ed., Literature and Politics in the Nineteenth Century: Essays (London: 1971), 89, 77;Google Scholar
  10. see also Sylvia Manning, “Social Criticism and Textual Subversion in Little Dorrit,” Dickens Studies Annual 20 (1991): 127–47.Google Scholar
  11. 8.
    See, for example, Patricia Ingham, “‘Nobody’s Fault’: the Scope of the Negative in Little Dorrit,” in John Schad, ed., Dickens Refigured: Bodies, Desires and Other Histories (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996), 98–116, 114;Google Scholar
  12. David Suchoff, Critical Theory and the Novel: Mass Society and Cultural Criticism in Dickens, Melville and Kafka (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1994), 65, 84–5.Google Scholar
  13. 9.
    David Simpson, Fetishism and Imagination: Dickens, Melville, Conrad (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982), 62;Google Scholar
  14. Astradur Eysteinsson, The Concept of Modernism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990), ch. 1.Google Scholar
  15. 11.
    For the details of the Treasury and Commissariat affairs, see Trey Philpotts, “Trevelyan, Treasury, and Circumlocution,” Dickens Studies Annual 22 (1993): 283–301.Google Scholar
  16. 12.
    PL 7: 533; see also Georgina Hogarth, Memorandum of 2 February 1906, MS Dickens House, quoted in Peter Ackroyd, Dickens: a Life (London: Sinclair Stevenson, 1990), 728.Google Scholar
  17. 13.
    For a description of developments in miasma and germ theory in this period, see Margaret Pelling, Cholera, Fever and English Medicine, 1825–1865 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978), 297–305 and passim,Google Scholar
  18. 14.
    See Jonathan Arac, “Hamlet, Little Dorrit, and the History of Character,” in Critical Conditions: Regarding the Historical Moment, ed. Michael Hays (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1992), 82–96, 86–8.Google Scholar
  19. 15.
    See also Peter Garrett, The Victorian Multiplot Novel, 75; Peter Brooks, Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative (New York: Vintage, 1985), 141.Google Scholar
  20. 16.
    Barry Quails, The Secular Pilgrims of Victorian Fiction: the Novel as Book of Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), 93–6.Google Scholar
  21. 18.
    Georg Simmel, “The Metropolis and Mental Life” (1903), in Individuality and Social Forms, ed. Donald N. Levine (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971), 337.Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    Wilkie Collins, “Gabriel’s Marriage,” Household Words 7 (16, 23 April 1853): 149, 181.Google Scholar
  23. 25.
    For the details of Dickens’s revisions of A Christmas Carol at this time, see Philip Collins, Charles Dickens: the Public Readings (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975), xxxvi, lxv, 2–3, and A Christmas Carol: the Public Reading Version, ed. and intro. Philip Collins (New York: New York Public Library, 1971).Google Scholar
  24. 27.
    For a monochromatic view of Dickens’s public readings as “wholly consonant with his responsibilities as an artist,” “the culmination of his lifetime’s dedication to the cause of popular entertainment,” see Paul Schlicke, Dickens and Popular Entertainment (London: Allen & Unwin, 1985), 228, 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 29.
    See “The Lost Arctic Voyagers,” Household Words (2 Dec. 1854), “Gone Astray” and Other Papers from Household Words, 1851–59, ed. Michael Slater (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1999), 255;Google Scholar
  26. “The Lost Arctic Voyagers,” Household Words (9 Dec. 1854), rpr. in Miscellaneous Papers, ed. B. W. Matz, 2 vols (London: Chapman and Hall, 1911), 1: 509–26.Google Scholar
  27. 30.
    Household Words (23 Dec. 1854), rpr. in Harry Stone, ed., CD’s Uncollected Writings from Household Words, 1850–59, 2 vols (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1968), 2: 513–22.Google Scholar
  28. 32.
    PL 8: 366 n.; see also Lillian Nayder, Unequal Partners: Charles Dickens, Wilkie Collins, and Victorian Authorship (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002), 60–99.Google Scholar
  29. For an account of The Frozen Deep featuring the developing relationship with the Ternan family, see Claire Tomalin, The Invisible Woman: the Story of Nelly Ternan and Charles Dickens (New York: Knopf, 1991), 96–100.Google Scholar
  30. 33.
    For an analysis of the revisions, including the Scott mechanism and the changes in Wardour’s character, see Robert Brannan, Under the Management of Charles Dickens: His Production of The Frozen Deep (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1966), 37–45.Google Scholar
  31. 35.
    Nicholas Nickleby, ed. Michael Slater (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1986), 497;Google Scholar
  32. on the coffee-room in the 1846 fragment, see John Forster, The Life of Charles Dickens, ed. A. J. Hoppé (London: Dent, 1966), 1: 25;Google Scholar
  33. G. K. Chesterton, Charles Dickens (1906; New York: Schocken, 1965), 47;Google Scholar
  34. John Bowen, Other Dickens (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 14.Google Scholar
  35. 36.
    See Jürgen Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: an Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1989), 57–67;Google Scholar
  36. T. J. Clark, “A Bar at the Folies Bergère,” in The Painting of Modern Life: Paris in the Art of Manet and his Followers, rev. edn (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999), 203–58.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    J. K. Huysmans, Against the Grain (A Rebours) (New York: Dover, 1969), 127–8.Google Scholar
  38. 39.
    See generally Raymond Williams, The Country and the City (New York: Oxford University Press, 1964), 153–64, and “Introduction,” Dombey and Son (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970), 11–34;Google Scholar
  39. Jonathan Arac, Commissioned Spirits: the Shaping of Social Motion in Dickens, Cariyle, Melville, and Hawthorne, 2nd edn (New York: Columbia University Press, 1989);Google Scholar
  40. and Priscilla Ferguson, Paris as Revolution: Writing the Nineteenth-Century City (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  41. 40.
    Compare D. A. Miller, The Novel and the Police (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 61.Google Scholar
  42. 41.
    See also Alexander Welsh, The City of Dickens (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971), 116; Myers, “The Radicalism of Little Dorrit,” 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 42.
    See N. N. Feltes, “Community and the Limits of Liability in Two Mid-Victorian Novels,” Victorian Studies 17 (1973–4): 360–5.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    See Walter Benjamin, “Allegory and Trauerspiel,” in The Origins of German Tragic Drama, trans. John Osborne (London: New Left Books, 1977), 159–60.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    See also Audrey Jaffe, Vanishing Points: Dickens, Narrative, and the Subject of Omniscience (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991), 1, 150;Google Scholar
  46. Hilary Schor, Dickens and the Daughter of the House (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 142–9.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    See also Janet Larson, Dickens and the Broken Scripture (Athens, Ga.: University of Georgia Press, 1985), 252; Myers, “The Radicalism of Little Dorrit,”Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    See Sergei Eisenstein, “Vertical Montage,” in Towards a Theory of Montage, Michael Glenny and Richard Taylor, eds, Selected Works, vol. 2 (London: BFI Publishing, 1991), 327–99, esp. 329–30.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    See Theodor W. Adorno, “On Epic Naiveté,” trans. Shierry Weber Nicholson, in Notes to Literature, ed. Rolf Tiedemann, 2 vols (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991), 2: 24–9, 28.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    See Franco Moretti, The Way of the World: the Bildungsroman in European Culture (London: Verso, 1987), 194.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    See, for example, E. B. Hamley, “Remonstrance with Dickens,” Blackwood’s 81 (1857): 497 (“[W]e sit down and weep when we remember thee, O Pickwick!”)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    M. M. Bakhtin, “Discourse in the Novel,” in The Dialogic Imagination, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981), 299, 316, 321.Google Scholar
  53. 54.
    Josef Breuer and Sigmund Freud, Studies on Hysteria (1893–5), in Standard Edition 2: 152. All further citations appear in the text as “SE.”Google Scholar
  54. 56.
    On the origins of Mr. F’s aunt’s rage, see also Elaine Showalter, “Guilt, Authority and the Shadows of Little Dorrit,” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 34 (1979): 20–40; for the Freudian analogue, see SE 2: 60, 62 n. 1, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 57.
    Garrett Stewart, Dickens and the Trials of Imagination (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976), 183, 253 (index entry).Google Scholar
  56. 58.
    Benjamin, “On Some Motifs in Baudelaire,” trans. Harry Zohn, in Illuminations, ed. Hannah Arendt (New York: Schocken, 1968), 170–3.Google Scholar
  57. 59.
    See James Joyce, Ulysses (New York: Random House, 1961), 73–4;Google Scholar
  58. Erving Goffmann, “Alienation From Interaction,” in Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior (Garden City: Anchor Books, 1967), 132–4;Google Scholar
  59. Franco Moretti, Modern Epic: the World System from Goethe to Garcia-Marquez (New York: Verso, 1996), 156.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Benjamin, “The Work of Art in the Era of Mechanical Reproduction,” in Illuminations, 236; Adorno, “On the Fetish Character in Music and the Regression of Listening” (1938), trans. unattributed, in Arato and Gebhardt, eds, The Essential Frankfurt School Reader (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978), 270–99, 286;Google Scholar
  61. see also Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination: a History of the Frankfurt School of Social Research, 1923–50 (1973; Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996), 189, 210–11.Google Scholar
  62. 61.
    On the sociological significance of the dramatic monologue, see, for example, Isobel Armstrong, Victorian Poetry: Poetry, Poetics and Politics (London: Routledge, 1993), 136–46;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Loy D. Martin, Browning’s Dramatic Monologues and the Post-Romantic Subject (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985), 106–8, 127–30;Google Scholar
  64. Robert Langbaum, The Poetry of Experience (New York: Random House, 1957), 159, 216, 232.Google Scholar
  65. For Miss Wade’s paper in relation to that poetic form, see Carol Bock, “Miss Wade and George Silverman: the Forms of Fictional Monologue,” Dickens Studies Annual 16 (1987): 113–26.Google Scholar
  66. 64.
    Fredric Jameson, Late Marxism: Adorno, Or, The Persistence of the Dialectic (London: Verson, 1990), 252.Google Scholar
  67. 65.
    G. W. F. Hegel, Lectures on the History of Philosophy, trans. E. S. Haldane and Frances H. Simpson, 3 vols (New York: Humanities Press, 1974), 3: 552–3;Google Scholar
  68. Marx, “The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte,” in The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd edn, ed. Robert C. Tucker (New York: Norton, 1978), 606; Freud, Interpretation of Dreams, SE 4: 262 ff., and “Psychopathic Characters on the Stage,” SE 7: 309–10.Google Scholar
  69. For much more on the connections between Hamlet and Little Dorrit, see also Ned Lukacher, Primal Scenes: Literature, Philosophy, Psychoanalysis (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986), chs 6–8.Google Scholar
  70. 66.
    See Little Dorrit, ed. Harvey Peter Sucksmith (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979), Appendix B, 806 (emphasis in original);Google Scholar
  71. Dickens’s Working Notes for His Novels, ed. and intro Harry Stone (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987), 258.Google Scholar
  72. 67.
    The developmental studies of the early 1970s consider John Chivery and Amy Dorrit as elements in this series. See James R. Kincaid, Dickens and the Rhetoric of Laughter (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971), 217;Google Scholar
  73. Alexander Welsh, The City of Dickens (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971), 150–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 68.
    On the relation between Little Dorrit and Pickwick, see also Steven Marcus, Dickens from Pickwick to Dombey (New York: Norton, 1965), 47–8; Kincaid, Dickens and the Rhetoric of Laughter, 192.Google Scholar
  75. 69.
    Hayden White, Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973), 93–4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© David Payne 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Payne

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations