Conclusion: The Past and Future Globalizations of Organized Labour
At the commencement of this book emphasis was placed on the need to give meaning to ‘globalization’ as it relates to agency and, specifically, on the agency of organized labour. We have set about this task by gauging the extent to which labour has integrated across national borders, as well as the extent to which it has become estranged from the state. We have been able to carefully dissect the political community that organized labour constitutes, and to explore the complex interplay of relationships — internal and external — and characteristics that bind this sprawling transnational network. We have also been able to isolate structural imperatives and note the ways in which they have impacted on labour over time.
KeywordsFree Trade Trade Union Trade Liberalization Free Trade Agreement Nongovernmental Organization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 294.ICFTU, ‘Trade unions, NGOs and tripartism: Decisions adopted by the Seventeenth World Congress of the ICFTU’ (paper presented at the Seventeenth World Congress of the ICFTU, Durban, 3–7 April 2000), p. 2.Google Scholar
- 297.World Confederation of Labour (WCL), ‘World Confederation of Labour: Activities Report 1998–2001’, (Brussels, 2001), p. 19.Google Scholar
- 301.Peter Waterman, ‘Social movement unionism: a new model for a new world order’, Review 16 (1993).Google Scholar
- 304.Patricia Ranald, ‘Korean unions resisting the International Monetary Fund’, in Protest and Globalisation, edited by James Goodman (Sydney, 2002).Google Scholar
- 305.Helen Trinca and Anne Davies, Waterfront: The Battle That Changed Australia (Milsons Point, 2000), pp. 211–23,Google Scholar
- John Wiseman, ‘Trade union solidarity: the Australian waterfront, 1998’, in Protest and Globalisation, edited by James Goodman (Sydney, 2002), p. 180.Google Scholar
- 306.See also Arne Melchior, ‘A global race for free trade agreements’, (Oslo, 2003).Google Scholar
- 307.Barry Carr, ‘Globalisation from below: labour internationalism under NAFTA’, International Social Science Journal 159 (1999): 53–4.Google Scholar