Skip to main content

Resisting and Acquiescing with Social Control

  • Chapter
Prison Discourse
  • 65 Accesses

Abstract

In the previous chapter my analysis of two ‘Values Enhancement’ classes (‘The Confidence Game’) was concerned with various discourse practices employed by the Cognitive Skills tutors to secure the Course participants’ compliance with the preferred values of the Course. However, these practices are open to challenge from below and are indeed contested by the inmates. I believe that an analysis of strategies of resistance is crucial for an understanding of power relations between interactants. I suggested in Chapter 1 that resistance, or at least the capacity for resistance, is immanent in the exercise of power, including the exercise of power in discourse. This chapter is therefore devoted to the examination of specific discourse practices the inmates employ as modes of resistance in the Cognitive Skills classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 2004 Andrea Mayr

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mayr, A. (2004). Resisting and Acquiescing with Social Control. In: Prison Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511965_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics