Skip to main content

Teamwork in China: Where Reality Challenges Theory and Practice1

  • Chapter

Abstract

This chapter examines theoretical and conceptual issues concerning teamwork in China. We discuss the increasing importance of teamwork in China’s business organizations and its relationship to the changing Chinese culture and economic environment. By placing teamwork in China in a cross-cultural context, we develop a conceptual model and associated propositions describing how individual attitudes and values influence teamwork.

An earlier version of this chapter was presented at the research conference Management and Organizations in China sponsored by the Center for Research on Organizations at HKUST, January 1998. This research was supported by a grant from the Center for Human Resource Management at the University of Illinois. We would like to thank Elizabeth Weldon for providing cogent and helpful comments on an earlier draft. Wei Huang contributed able research assistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Becker,T. E. 1992. ‘Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making?’, Academy of Management Journal, 35: 232–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, T. E. and Billings, R. S. 1993. ‘Prof iles of commitment: An empirical test’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14: 177–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. W. 1998. ‘Performance and retention of prof essional employees who work in teams: The effects of commitment and support’, Clinical Laboratory Management Review,12(3):150–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. W. and Scott, K. D. 1996. ‘Multiple foci of commitment in a work team environment’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Cincinnati.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. W. and Scott, K. D. 1997. ‘Employee commitment and work team productivity’, HR Magazine, 42(2): 107–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyacigiller, N. A. and Adler, N. J. 1991. ‘The parochial dinosaur: Organizational science in a global context’, Academy of Management Review, 16: 262–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P. and Aldag, R. G. 1980. ‘Antecedents of organizational commitment among hospital nurses’, Sociology of Work and Occupations, 7(2): 210–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C., Chen, X. P. and Meindl, J. R. 1998. How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism’, Academy of Management Review, 23: 285–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. 1996. Management in China During the Age of Reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley, C. 1989. ‘Social loafing and collectivism: A comparison of the United States and the People’s Republic of China’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 565–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, C. 1993. ‘East meets West meets Mideast: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups’, Academy of Management Journal, 36: 319–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchinson, S. and Sowa, D. 1986. ‘Perceived organizational support’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 500–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. 1960. ‘The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement’, American Sociological Review, 25: 161–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hof stede, G. 1980. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hof stede, G. 1997. Cultures and Organizations: Sof tware of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. 1943. ‘Defining the “field at a given time”’, Psychological Review, 50: 292–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E. and Zajac, D. M. 1990. ‘A review and meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment’, Psychological Bulletin, 108: 171–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. H. and Snyder, R. A. 1979. ‘A second look at need achievement and need for autonomy as moderators of role perception-outcome relationships’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 64: 173–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. H. and Steers, R. M. 1980. ‘Structural influences on organizational commitment’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 17: 50–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie, J. R. 1987. ‘The role of Human Resource Management practices in prediction of organizational commitment’, Group and Organizational Studies, 11: 335–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • People’s Daily. 1998. 26 January: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding, S. G. 1990. The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism. New York: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichers, A. E. 1985. ‘A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment’, Academy of Management Review, 10: 465–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, J. H. 1998. “‘Super bowl” builds teamwork’, Industry Week, 19 October: 24–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. 1995. Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C., Chen, X. P. and Chan, D. K-S. 1998. ‘Scenarios for the measurement of collectivism and individualism’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29: 275–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walder, A. G. 1986. Communist neo-traditionalism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M. and Liden, R. C. 1997. ‘Perceived organizational support and leadermember exchange: A social exchange perspective’. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 82–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, X., Bishop, J.W., Scott, K.D. (2000). Teamwork in China: Where Reality Challenges Theory and Practice1 . In: Li, J.T., Tsui, A.S., Weldon, E. (eds) Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511590_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics