Abstract
My overarching thesis — as I will henceforth refer to it — is that, to the extent we can make sense of naturalistic epistemic norms, there is no need for such norms in the process of rational belief-formation. To appreciate the significance of this claim, one of course needs to know something about NE (and how I understand this), and to do that, one also needs — since epistemology was originally conceived and pursued as a discipline that could only be described as anything but naturalistic — to look first at how epistemology is conceived on a more traditional model. In this chapter, I will present the outlines of what I call TE before showing how this, arguably, breaks down, paving the way for naturalism and NE.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2003 Jonathan Knowles
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Knowles, J. (2003). Traditional Epistemology and Naturalism. In: Norms, Naturalism and Epistemology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511262_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511262_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50836-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-51126-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)