Advertisement

The Study of Diplomacy

  • Christer Jönsson
  • Martin Hall
Part of the Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations book series (SID)

Abstract

The lack of theoretical interest in diplomacy alluded to in the Introduction, does not imply any dearth of literature on the subject. On the contrary, there is an abundance of narratives of various kinds dealing with diplomacy Before setting out on our own theorizing effort, we therefore need to give a brief account of the existing literature and ask ourselves what can be learned from it. The second question we address in this chapter concerns the causes of the relative lack of theorizing of diplomacy and its marginalization in IR theory.

Keywords

International Relation Methodological Individualism Political Space Billiard Ball English School 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Cf. J.S. Levy, “Explaining Events and Developing Theories: History, Political Science, and the Analysis of International Relations,” in C. Elman and M.F. Elman (eds), Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political Scientists, and the Study of International Relations (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001);Google Scholar
  2. J.S. Levy, “Too Important to Leave to the Other: History and Political Science in the Study of International Relations,” International Security, 22 (1997) 22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 4.
    See K. Nag, Theories of Diplomacy in Kautilya’s Arthasastra (Calcutta: Writers Workshop Publications, 1997);Google Scholar
  4. B. Mukherjee, Kautilya’s Concept of Diplomacy: A New Interpretation (Calcutta: Minerva, 1976).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    See G. Mattingly, Renaissance Diplomacy (London: Jonathan Cape, 1955), pp. 28–30.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    M. Keens-Soper, “Wicquefort,” in G.R. Berridge, M. Keens-Soper and T.G. Otte, Diplomatic Theory from Machiavelli to Kissinger (Houndmills and New York: Palgrave, 2001), p. 88.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    H. Nicolson, Diplomacy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1939);Google Scholar
  8. H. Nicolson, The Evolution of Diplomatic Method (London: Constable, 1954);Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    H. Bull, The Anarchic Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (London: Macmillan, 1977), p. 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 13.
    K. Hamilton and R. Langhorne, The Practice of Diplomacy: Its Evolution, Theory and Administration (London and New York: Routledge, 1995), p. 89.Google Scholar
  11. 14.
    S. Haber, D.M. Kennedy and S.D. Krasner, “Brothers Under the Skin: Diplomatic History and International Relations,” International Security, 22 (1997) 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 15.
    M. Hunt, “The Long Crisis in U.S. Diplomatic History: Coming to Closure,” Diplomatic History, 16 (1992) 115–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 17.
    G.P. Lauren, “Diplomacy: History, Theory, and Policy,” in G.P. Lauren (ed.), Diplomacy: New Approaches in History’ Theory and Policy (New York: Free Press, 1979), p. 4.Google Scholar
  14. 20.
    J.M. Munn-Rankin, “Diplomacy in Western Asia in the Early Second Millennium BC,” Iraq, XVIII, pt 1 (1956) 68–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 21.
    W.L. Moran (ed. and trans.), The Amarna Letters (Baltimore, MD and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992);Google Scholar
  16. R. Cohen and R. Westbrook (eds), Amarna Diplomacy: The Beginning of International Relations (Baltimore, MD and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000);Google Scholar
  17. M. Liverani, International Relations in the Ancient Near East, 1600–1100 BC (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 22.
    G. Beckman, Hittite Diplomatic Texts (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  19. R.L. Walker, The Multi-State System of Ancient China (Hamden, CT: Shoe String Press, 1953);Google Scholar
  20. R. Britton, “Chinese Interstate Intercourse before 700 BC,” in C. Jönsson and R. Langhorne (eds), Diplomacy, Volume II (London: Sage, 2004).Google Scholar
  21. G.J. Roy, Diplomacy in Ancient India (New Delhi: Janaki Prakashan, 1981);Google Scholar
  22. F. E. Adcock and J. Mosley, Diplomacy in Ancient Greece (London: Thames and Hudson, 1975);Google Scholar
  23. J.D. Mosley, “Envoys and Diplomacy in Ancient Greece,” Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte, Einzelschriften, Heft 22 (Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1973);Google Scholar
  24. C.P. Jones, Kinship Diplomacy in the Ancient World (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  25. A. Watson, Diplomacy: The Dialogue Between States (London: Eyre Methuen, 1982), pp. 89–92.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    B. Campbell, “Diplomacy in the Roman World (c. 500 BC-AD 235),” Diplomacy and Statecraft, 12 (2001) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. J. Shepard and S. Franklin (eds), Byzantine Diplomacy (Aldershot: Variorum, 1992);Google Scholar
  28. D.E. Queller, The Office of the Ambassador in the Middle Ages (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
  29. 30.
    B. Hocking, “Catalytic Diplomacy: Beyond ‘Newness’ and ‘Decline,’ “ in J. Melissen (ed.), Innovation in Diplomatic Practice (London: Macmillan, 1999).Google Scholar
  30. 31.
    R. Numelin, The Beginnings of Diplomacy: A Sociological Study of Inter-tribal and International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1950), p. 14.Google Scholar
  31. 32.
    See, for example, W.R. Jacobs, “Wampum: The Protocol of Indian Diplomacy,” William and Mary Quarterly, 6 (1949) 596–604;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. F. Jennings et al. (eds), The History and Culture of Iroquois Diplomacy (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1985);Google Scholar
  33. D. Flores, “Bison Ecology and Bison Diplomacy: The Southern Plains from 1800 to 1850,” Journal of American History, 78 (1991) 465–85;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. J.A. Brandao and W.A. Starna, “The Treaties of 1701: A Triumph of Iroquois Diplomacy,” Ethnohistory, 43 (1996) 209–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 33.
    See, for example, R. Smith, “Peace and Palaver: International Relations in Pre-Colonial West Africa,” Journal of African History, 14 (1973) 599–621;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. G.W. Irwin, “Precolonial African Diplomacy: The Example of Asante,” International Journal of African Historical Studies, 8 (1975) 81–96;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. R. Reid, “Mutesa and Mirambo: Thoughts on East African Warfare and Diplomacy in the Nineteenth Century,” International Journal of African Historical Studies, 31 (1998) 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 34.
    For overviews, see C. Jonsson, “Diplomacy, Bargaining and Negotiation,” in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B.A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage, 2002);Google Scholar
  39. P. Sharp, “For Diplomacy: Representation and the Study of International Relations,” International Studies Review, 1 (1999) 33–57;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. R. Cohen, International Politics: The Rules of the Game (London and New York: Longman, 1981).Google Scholar
  41. S. Simpson, “Education in Diplomacy,” in S. Simpson (ed.), Education in Diplomacy: An Instructional Guide (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1987), p. 26.Google Scholar
  42. 38.
    J. Thomson, Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns: State-Building and Extraterritorial Violence in Early Modern Europe (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994), p. 15.Google Scholar
  43. 39.
    M. Emirbayer, “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology,” American Journal of Sociology, 103 (1997) 281–317;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. M. Somers, “ ‘We’re No Angels’: Realism, Rational Choice, and Rationality in Social Science,” American Journal of Sociology, 104 (1998) 722–84;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. A. Abbott, “Things of Boundaries,” in A. Abbott (ed.), Time Matters: On Theory and Method (Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  46. 40.
    M. Albert, D. Jacobson and Y. Lapid (eds), Identities, Borders, Orders: Rethinking International Relations Theory (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2001);Google Scholar
  47. P.T. Jackson and D.H. Nexon, “Relations Before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics,” European Journal of International Relations, 5 (1999) 291–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 46.
    A. Giddens, The Nation State and Violence (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1985), p. 263.Google Scholar
  49. 47.
    C. Tilly, Stories, Identity, and Political Change (New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2002), p. 34.Google Scholar
  50. 48.
    M. Mann, The Sources of Social Power I: A History of Power from the Beginning to ad. 1760 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    R. Van Krieken, “Norbert Elias and Process Sociology,” in G. Ritzer and B. Smart (eds), Handbook of Social Theory (London: Sage, 2001), p. 357.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    J.G. Ruggie, Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization (London: Routledge, 1998), p. 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    H.J. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 3rd edn (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1966), p. 139.Google Scholar
  54. 57.
    R. Aron, Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations (New York: Praeger, 1966), p. 40.Google Scholar
  55. 58.
    R. Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), p. 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 59.
    B. Buzan, C. Jones and R. Little, The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), p. 40.Google Scholar
  57. 60.
    A. Moravcsik, “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics,” International Organization, 51 (1997) 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 61.
    R.O. Keohane, “Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond,” in R.O. Keohane (ed.), International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1989), p. 52.Google Scholar
  59. 62.
    J.S. Nye, Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power (New York: Basic Books, 1990), p. 256.Google Scholar
  60. 63.
    R. Rosecrance, The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World (New York: Basic Books, 1986).Google Scholar
  61. 64.
    See, for example, I. Wallerstein, The Capitalist World Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979);Google Scholar
  62. A.G. Frank and B.K. Gills (eds), The World System: Five Hundred Years or Five Thousand? (London: Routledge, 1993)Google Scholar
  63. 65.
    See, for example, R.W. Cox, Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History (New York: Columbia University Press, 1987);Google Scholar
  64. S. Gill, American Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  65. 66.
    See, for example, J. Rosenberg, The Empire of Civil Society (London: Verso, 1994);Google Scholar
  66. B. Teschke, The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics and the Making of Modern International Relations (London: Verso, 2003).Google Scholar
  67. 71.
    O. Waever, “Four Meanings of International Society: A Trans-Atlantic Dialogue,” in B.A. Robertson (ed.), International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory, 2nd revised edn (London: Continuum, 2002), p. 84.Google Scholar
  68. 72.
    J.N. Rosenau, Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990), ch. 2.Google Scholar
  69. 73.
    See, for example, T. Dunne, Inventing International Society: A History of the English School (London: Macmillan, 1998);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. B.A. Roberson (ed.), International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory, 2nd revised edn (London: Continuum, 2002);Google Scholar
  71. B. Buzan, From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. P. Sharp, “The English School, Herbert Butterfield, and Diplomacy,” all papers presented at the International Studies Association Annual Conference, New Orleans, 23–27 March 2002.Google Scholar
  73. 75.
    I.B. Neumann, “The English School on Diplomacy,” Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, No. 79 (The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations “Clingendael,” 2002), p. 7Google Scholar
  74. 76.
    H. Bull, The Anarchical Society (London: Macmillan, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. A. Watson, The Evolution of International Society (London and New York: Routledge, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 81.
    J. Der Derian, On Diplomacy: A Genealogy of Western Estrangement (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987), p. 23.Google Scholar
  77. 86.
    C. Reus-Smit, The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999), p. 14.Google Scholar
  78. 90.
    I. Neumann, “ ‘Grab a Phaser, Ambassador’: Diplomacy in Star Trek,” Millennium, 30 (2001) 603–24;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. I. Neumann, “Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy,” Millennium, 31 (2002) 627–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Christer Jönsson and Martin Hall 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christer Jönsson
    • 1
  • Martin Hall
    • 1
  1. 1.Lund UniversitySweden

Personalised recommendations