Skip to main content

Who Influences Debates in Business Ethics? An Investigation into the Development of Corporate Governance in the UK since 1990

  • Chapter
Book cover Understanding How Issues in Business Ethics Develop

Abstract

Corporate governance has been defined as ‘the system by which companies are directed and controlled’.1 As such, corporate governance relates to the organisation and functioning of the company board of directors. In the UK, the debate about corporate governance has a number of key elements.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Boyd, C. (1996) ‘Ethics and Corporate Governance: The Issues Raised by the Cadbury Report in the United Kingdom’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 167–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadbury, A. (1990) The Company Director, London: Director Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadbury, A. (2000) ‘The Corporate Governance Agenda’, Corporate Governance, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charkham, J.P. (1994) Keeping Good Company: a study of corporate govemance in five countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Corporate Governance (1998) Final Report [Hampel Report], London: Gee Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (1992) Report with Code of Best Practice [Cadbury Report], London: Gee Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (1992) Draft Report [Cadbury Draft Report], London: Gee Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (1995) Compliance with the Code of Best Practice, London: Gee Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conyon, M., Clarke, R. and Peck, S. (1998) ‘Corporate governance and directors’ remuneration: views from the top’, Business Strategy Review, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conyon, M. and Leech, D.J. (1994) ‘Top Pay, Company Performance and Corporate Governance’, Oxford Bulletin ofEconomics and Statistics, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 229–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. and Deakin, S. (1999) ‘Chapter 10: Empirical Evidence on Corporate Control’, in ESRC Centre for Business Research, Literature Survey on Factual, Empirical and Legal Issues, Cambridge: ESRC Centre for Business Research at www.dti.gov.uk/cld/esrcl0pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • DTI (1996) Developing a Winning Partnership [Myners Report], London: DTI.

    Google Scholar 

  • DTI (1998) Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy, London: DTI at www.dti.gov.uk/cld/reviews/condocs.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • DTI (1999) Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy: The Strategic Framework, London: DTI at www.dti.gov.uk/cld/reviews/condocs.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • DTI (2000a) Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy: Developing the Framework, London: DTI at www.dti.gov.uk/cld/reviews/condocs.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • DTI (2000b) Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy: Completing the Structure, London: DTI at www.dti.gov.uk/cld/reviews/condocs.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • DTI (2001) Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy: Final Report, London: DTI at www.dti.gov.uk/cld/final_report/index.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, V. (1992) ‘Board Performance and Cadbury on Corporate Governance’, Journal of Business Law, pp. 581–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, J. and Mayer, C. (1990) ‘Capital Markets and Corporate Control: A Study of France, Germany and the UK’, Economic Policy, April, pp. 189–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury (2001) Institutional Investment in the United Kingdom: A Review [Myners Report, 2001], London: HM Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, W. (1995) The State Were In, London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICEAW (1999) Internal Control — Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code [Turnbull Report], London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, I.W. and Pollitt, M.G. (1996) ‘Economics, Ethics and Integrity in Business’ Journal of General Management, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 30–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, I.W. and Pollitt, M.G. (eds) (1998) The Role of BusinessEthics in Economic Performance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan/St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. and Silbertson, A. (1995) ‘Corporate governance’, National Institute Economic Review, vol. 153, pp. 84–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monks, R.A.G., (2000) ‘Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy: the strategic framework’, Corporate Governance, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1991) OECD Economic Outlook July1991, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, J. (2000) ‘Evolution and Policy in Company Law: The Non-Executive Director’, in J. Parkinson, A. Gamble and G. Kelly (eds), The Political Economy of the Company, Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, J. (2002) ‘Inclusive Company Law’, in J. de Lacy (ed.), The Reform of Company Law in the UK, London: Cavendish.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, J. and Kelly, G. (1999) ‘The Combined Code on Corporate Governance’, Political Quarterly, vol. 70, pp. 101–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutteman Working Group (1994) Internal Control and Financial Reporting: Guidance for directors of listed companies registered in the UK [Rutteman Report], London: Rutteman Working Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Study Group on Directors’ Remuneration (1995) Directors’Remuneration: Report of a Study Group Chaired by Sir Richard Greenbury [Greenbury Report], London: Gee Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, M., Copnell, T. and Wicks, C. (1999) The Combined Code — A Practical Guide, London: Gee Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tricker, B. (1998) ‘Editorial: Platitudes parading as paradigms’, Corporate Governance, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 2–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, S. (1997) ‘Corporate Governance: its Scope, Concerns and Theories’, Corporate Governance, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 180–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, G. (1993) ‘Corporate Governance and the Regulation of Financial Reporting’, Accounting and Business Research, vol. 23, no. 91, p. 311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. (2000) ‘Business, State and Community: Responsible Risk Takers. New Labour and the Governance of Corporate Business’, Journal ofLaw and Society, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 151–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2002 Ian W. Jones and Michael G. Pollitt

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, I.W., Pollitt, M.G. (2002). Who Influences Debates in Business Ethics? An Investigation into the Development of Corporate Governance in the UK since 1990. In: Jones, I.W., Pollitt, M.G. (eds) Understanding How Issues in Business Ethics Develop. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511033_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics