Abstract
Relations between the United States and Britain over East-West trade controls had reached a low ebb by the end of the Eisenhower administration. During the late 1950s the two countries had clashed over the abandonment of the China ‘differential’ and fiercely debated the criteria for restricting goods in trade with the Soviet bloc. As a result, the 1960–61 CoCom review had been fraught with friction as Washington and London attempted to pull the multilateral export control programme in different directions. American officials had wanted to add more technologically advanced products to the international lists. Conversely the British negotiators had sought to reduce considerably the scope and size of the embargo, on the basis that the Soviet Union was a highly sophisticated industrial nation and therefore would not be affected by Western trade controls.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Michael R. Beschloss, Kennedy V. Khrushchev: The Crisis Years, 1960–63 (London: Faber and Faber, 1991).
James N. Giglio, The Presidency of John F. Kennedy (Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 1991), pp. 45–50.
Pascaline Winand, Eisenhower, Kennedy and the United States of Europe (London: Macmillan, 1993), pp. 139–60.
Diane B. Kunz, Butter and Guns: America’s Cold War Diplomacy (New York: The Free Press, 1997), pp. 120–48.
John Lewis Gaddis, Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of Post-War American National Security Policy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1982), pp. 198–237.
Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr, A Thousand Days: John F. Kennedy in the White House (New York: Fawcett Edition, 1971), pp. 319–76;
Theodore C. Sorensen, Kennedy (London: Pan, 1966), pp. 644–700.
For an excellent account of Khrushchev ‘s Cold War policies based on Soviet government sources, see Vladislav Zubok and Constantine Pleshakov, Inside the Kremlin’s Cold War: From Stalin to Khrushchev (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996), pp. 236–75.
Aleksandr Fursenko and Timothy Naftali, ‘One Hell of A Gamble’: Khrushchev, Castro, Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crisis, 1958–64 (London: Pimlico 1999), pp. 216–90;
John Lewis Gaddis, We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 260–81;
Ernest R. May and Philip D. Zelikow (eds), The Kennedy Tapes: Inside the White House During the Cuban Missiles Crisis (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997).
Alistair Horne, Macmillan, 1957–1986: Volume II of the Official Biography (London, Macmillan, 1989), pp. 361–87.
Alan P. Dobson, Anglo-American Relations in the Twentieth Century: of friendship, conflict and the rise and decline of superpowers (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 124–131.
Christopher J. Matthews, Kennedy and Nixon: The Rivalry that Shaped Postwar America (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996), p. 75.
For details of Kennedy’s attempt to amend the Battle Act in 1957 see Philip J. Funigiello, American-Soviet Trade in the Cold War (Chapel Hill, NC, University of North Carolina Press, 1988), pp. 124–5.
See Bruce W. Jentleson, ‘From consensus to conflict: the domestic political economy of East-West energy trade policy’, International Organisation, vol. 38, no. 4 (Autumn 1984), pp. 637–44;
Michael Mastanduno, Economic Containment: CoCom and the Politics of East-West Trade (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992), pp. 128–31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2001 Ian Jackson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jackson, I. (2001). Conflict and Conciliation: Kennedy, Macmillan and East-West Trade, 1961–63. In: The Economic Cold War. Cold War History Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510920_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510920_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42444-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-51092-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)