Advertisement

A Gendered Affliction: Women, Writing, Madness

  • Allan Ingram
  • Michelle Faubert

Abstract

In the eighteenth century, the realm of madness was a locus of intensity in terms of the perception of women. Characteristics that were attributed to women multiplied in degree when madness was on the horizon. If women were viewed as passive and sexualized, mad women were viewed thus to a much greater degree, for, in and of itself, madness was perceived as having the same features. As such, we may regard eighteenth-century madness as a gendered affliction: what characterized women also characterized madmen. This topic I will outline shortly with reference to the treatment of the mad in madhouses. First, however, I will delineate the connection between madness and women as it is established by one of the most famous — and, indeed, most influential — female writers of the century, Mary Wollstonecraft. In her political works, such as A Vindication of the Rights of Men from 1790, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman from 1792, and in her novels, such as The Wrongs of Woman, or Maria, published in 1798, Wollstonecraft illustrates that eighteenth-century women were encouraged to adopt the same characteristics as those that were widely recognized as typifying madmen.1 By reading these different modes of Wollstonecraft’s literary output in conjunction, it becomes apparent that Wollstonecraft presents popularly conceived womanhood as an afflicted gender.

Keywords

Eighteenth Century French Revolution Cultural Construction Female Writer Sentimental Nature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Wollstonecraft: Political Writings, ed. Janet Todd, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993,Google Scholar
  2. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman with Strictures on Political and Moral Subjects (1792), ed. Ashley Tauchert. 2nd rev. ed, London: J. M. Dent, 1995, andGoogle Scholar
  3. Mary, A Fiction and The Wrongs of Woman (1787, 1798), ed. Gary Kelly, London: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  4. 2.
    William Godwin, Caleb Williams (1794), ed. David M. McCracken, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970, p. 210.Google Scholar
  5. 3.
    G. S. Rousseau, ‘Nerves, Spirits, and Fibres: Towards Defining the Origins of Sensibility’, Blue Guitar 2: 1976, p. 135.Google Scholar
  6. 4.
    Helen Small, Medicine, the Novel, and Female Insanity 1800–1865, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996, p. viii.Google Scholar
  7. 5.
    Peter Melville Logan, Nerves and Narratives: A Cultural History of Hysteria in Nineteenth-Century British Prose, London: University of California Press, 1997, p. xiii.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mary Wollstonecraft, The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Janet Todd and Marilyn Butler, London: William Pickering, 1989, Volume 4, p. 29.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mary Wollstonecraft, Collected Letters of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Ralph M. Wardle, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1979, p. 145.Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    Samuel Richardson, Clarissa, or The History of a Young Lady (1747–48), ed. Angus Ross, New York: Viking, 1985, p. 890.Google Scholar
  11. 17.
    Vivien Jones, ‘Women Writing Revolution: Narratives of History and Sexuality in Wollstonecraft and Williams’, in Beyond Romanticism: New Approaches to Texts and Contexts, 1780–1832, eds Stephen Copley and John Whale, London: Routledge, 1992, p. 181.Google Scholar
  12. 18.
    Robert Kaufman, ‘The Madness of George III, By Mary Wollstonecraft’, Studies in Romanticism 37.1: 1998, p. 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 21.
    Anne K. Mellor, ‘Introduction’, Maria, or The Wrongs of Woman (1798), by Mary Wollstonecraft, London: W. W. Norton & Company, 1994, pp. xi, xii.Google Scholar
  14. 23.
    Virginia Sapiro, ‘Wollstonecraft, Feminism, and Democracy: “Being Bastilled”’, in Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Maria J. Falco, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996, p. 40.Google Scholar
  15. 24.
    Eva Figes, Sex and Subterfuge: Women Novelists to 1850, London: Macmillan, 1982, p. 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 30.
    Janet Todd, Mary Wollstonecraft: A Revolutionary Life, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 2000, p. 427.Google Scholar
  17. 36.
    Roy Porter, Mind Forg’d Manacles: A History of Madness in England from the Restoration to the Regency. London: Athlone Press, 1987, p. 95. Wollstonecraft herself differed in opinion as to the possible mental states of those who commit suicide. She wrote to Gilbert Imlay, regarding her own suicide attempt, that it was ‘one of the calmest acts of reason’ (Letters, p. 317). However, her very assertion of her sanity during this act indicates Wollstonecraft’s understanding that her audience would readily assume one to be insane during a suicide attempt.Google Scholar
  18. 40.
    R. F. Brissenden, Virtue in Distress: Studies in the Novel of Sentiment from Richardson to Sade, London: Macmillan, 1974, p. 54.Google Scholar
  19. 44.
    John Mullan, Sentiment and Sociability: The Language of Feeling in the Eighteenth Century, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988, p. 68.Google Scholar
  20. 45.
    Michael Donnelly, Managing the Mind: A Study of Medical Psychology in Early Nineteenth-Century Britain, London: Tavistock, 1983, p. 107.Google Scholar
  21. 48.
    Cited in Allan Ingram, ed., Patterns of Madness in the Eighteenth Century, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1998, p. 241.Google Scholar
  22. 49.
    Cited in Allan Ingram, ed., Voices of Madness: Four Pamphlets, 1683–1796, Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing Limited, 1997, p. 135.Google Scholar
  23. 51.
    Elaine Showalter, The Female Malady: Women, Madness, and English Culture, 1830–1980, New York: Pantheon, 1985, p. 10.Google Scholar
  24. 53.
    Jonathan Andrews and Andrew Scull, Customers and Patrons of the Mad-Trade: The Management of Lunacy in Eighteenth-Century London, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003, p. 71.Google Scholar
  25. 54.
    Laurence Sterne, A Sentimental Journey through France and Italy and Continuation of the Bramine’s Journal, ed. Melvyn New and W. G. Day, Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2002, p. 153.Google Scholar
  26. 56.
    William Cowper, The Task, and Selected Other Poems, ed. James Sambrook, London: Longman, 1994, ll. 537–8, 545–47.Google Scholar
  27. 58.
    Henry Mackenzie, The Man of Feeling (1771), ed. Brian Vickers, London: Oxford University Press, 1967, pp. 23, 26, 25, 26, 27.Google Scholar
  28. 59.
    William Shakespeare, Hamlet, ed. Cyrus Hoy, New York: W. W. Norton, 1992, ll. 2–3, 29–32, 69–70.Google Scholar
  29. 60.
    Andrew M. Cooper, ‘Blake and Madness: The World Turned Inside Out’, English Literary History 57: 1990, p. 606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 62.
    William Wordsworth, ‘The Thorn’, William Wordsworth: A Critical Edition of the Major Works, ed. Stephen Gill, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984, ll. 117–18, 122–32.Google Scholar
  31. 65.
    Richard Hunter and Ida Macalpine, Three Hundred Years of Psychiatry 1535–1860, London: Oxford University Press, 1963, p. 698.Google Scholar
  32. 66.
    Andrew Scull, Museums of Madness: The Social Organization of Insanity in Nineteenth-Century England, London: Allen Lane, 1979, p. 75.Google Scholar
  33. 67.
    Eckbert Faas, Retreat into the Mind: Victorian Poetry and the Rise of Psychiatry, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988, p. 38.Google Scholar
  34. 68.
    Mary Alcock, ‘A Receipt for Writing a Novel’, Eighteenth-Century Women Poets, ed. Roger Lonsdale, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, ll. 64, 67–72.Google Scholar
  35. 69.
    Mary Robinson, ‘Poor Marguerite’, Romantic Women Poets, 1788–1848, ed. Andrew Ashfield, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998, ll. 49–56.Google Scholar
  36. 70.
    Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar, The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Imagination, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979, p. 78.Google Scholar
  37. 74.
    George Cheyne, M. D., The English Malady: or, a Treatise of Nervous Diseases of All Kinds, as Spleen, Vapours, Lowness of Spirits, Hypochondriacal, and Hysterical Distempers &c., London: G. Strahan and J. Leake, 1733, pp. 260, 261.Google Scholar
  38. 75.
    Anne Finch, ‘The Spleen’, The Poems of Anne, Countess of Winchilsea, ed. Myra Reynolds, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1903, ll. 64–73.Google Scholar
  39. 76.
    Hannah Allen, A Narrative of God’s Gracious Dealings with that Choice Christian, Mrs. Hannah Allen (1683), in Voices of Madness: Four Pamphlets, 1683–1796, ed. Allan Ingram, Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing Limited, 1997.Google Scholar
  40. 79.
    Yet, Alan Bewell has cogently argued that Martha’s community suspects her of having ‘entered into a compact with the devil and murdered her child at the sabbat’, an interpretation of the poem that would put Martha into malevolent company with Hannah Allen (Wordsworth and the Enlightenment: Nature, Man, and Society in Experimental Poetry, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989, p. 165). For the purposes of the present argument about female madness, though, I emphasize the most direct explanation for Martha’s mad behaviour that is offered in the poem, which is that the father of her child left her.Google Scholar
  41. 80.
    R. A. Houston, Madness and Society in Eighteenth-Century Scotland, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000, p. 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 81.
    Houston, pp. 86–7. Hilary Marland confirms that ‘“puerperal insanity” was propelled into the medical arena’ ‘in the 1820s and 1830s’ in ‘At home with puerperal mania: the domestic treatments of the insanity of childbirth in the nineteenth century’, in Outside the Walls of the Asylum: The History of Care in the Community 1750–2000, ed. Peter Bartlett and David Wright, London: Athlone Press, 1999, p. 45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Michelle Faubert 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allan Ingram
  • Michelle Faubert

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations