The Post-Union Traveller, 1800–1820

  • Glenn Hooper

Abstract

The late eighteenth century saw a sharp increase in contact between Ireland and France. In fact, so developed was the relationship between the two countries during this period that an attempt was made to land a fleet of 43 ships, complete with 15,000 troops, off the coast of Bantry Bay, County Cork in December 1796. Although the ultimate objectives of the mission were to be spectacularly thwarted by a combination of storms and disagreements, and the fleet forced to return to France with little engagement to report, the action constitutes not only a ‘great might-have-been in Irish history’ but a significant level of commitment and coordinated determination on the part of Theobald Wolfe Tone, the adjutant-general of the fleet, and prominent United Irishman.1 Indeed, the Bantry Bay episode boosted ‘popular disaffection in Ireland’ to such an extent that despite its failure a threat was still perceived in the country and the possibility that an, admittedly unaided, insurrection might eventually take place remained strong.2 With tensions running high, arms stockpiling and the mobilisation of troops becoming a feature of Irish life, then, it came as no surprise when rebellion was eventually precipitated on 23 May 1798. The insurgents were effectively crushed by 21 June of that year; another French expedition, which landed at Killala in County Mayo on 22 August, was also defeated.

Keywords

Europe Transportation Coherence Assimilation Expense 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    R. Foster, Modern Ireland (London: Penguin, 1987), p. 278.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Elliott, Partners in Revolution: The United Irishmen and France (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982), p. 124.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Batten, Pleasurable Instruction: Form and Convention in Eighteenth-Century Travel Literature (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978), p. 40.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    M. L. Pratt, Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation (London: Routledge, 1992), pp. 74–5.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    C. Bolt, Victorian Attitudes to Race (London: RKP, 1971), p. 1.Google Scholar
  6. 15.
    Giraldus Cambrensis [Gerald of Wales], The History and Topography of Ireland, trans. J. O’ Meara (London: Penguin, 1982), pp. 101–2.Google Scholar
  7. 17.
    P. Hulme, Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean, 1492–1797 (London: Methuen, 1986), p. 6.Google Scholar
  8. 20.
    S. Greenblatt, Marvelous Possessions: The Wonder of the New World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991), p. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 37.
    Thomas Richards, The Imperial Archive: Knowledge and the Fantasy of Empire (London: Verso, 1993), p. 3Google Scholar
  10. 38.
    See M. Daly, The Spirit of Earnest Inquiry: The Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland 1847–1997 (Dublin: Institute of Public Administration, 1997).Google Scholar
  11. 39.
    D. Clarke, ‘Dublin Society’s Statistical Surveys’, Paper read before the Bibliographical Society of Ireland, 30th April, 1957 (Athlone: Athlone Printing, 1957), p. 3.Google Scholar
  12. 50.
    For a discussion of Newenham and his contribution to Irish political life, see H. D. Gribbon, ‘Thomas Newenham, 1762–1831’, in J. M. Goldstrom and L. A. Clarkson, eds, Irish Population, Economy, and Society (Oxford: Clarendon, 1981).Google Scholar
  13. 63.
    Daniel Augustus Beaufort (1739–1821) was educated at TCD, and ordained in 1763, succeeding his father, Daniel Cornelius, as Rector of Navan from 1765–1818. Publications include Memoir of a Map of Ireland (1792) and The Diocese of Meath (1797). One of the eighty-eight foundation members of the Royal Irish Academy, Beaufort was a reputedly lively contributor to Irish antiquarian studies. See C. C. Ellison, The Hopeful Traveller: The Life and Times of Daniel Augustus Beaufort (Kilkenny: Boethius, 1987), for a fond biography.Google Scholar
  14. 78.
    W. Sherman, ‘Stirrings and Searchings (1500–1720)’, in P. Hulme and T. Youngs, eds, The Cambridge Companion to Travel Writing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), p. 31.Google Scholar
  15. 96.
    Cora Kaplan, Sea Changes: Culture and Feminism (London, 1988), p. 77.Google Scholar
  16. 97.
    Mills’s assessment is worth some consideration in this regard: ‘However, as I have already noted, women writers are caught in a double-bind situation: if they tend towards the discourses of femininity in their work they are regarded as trivial, and if they draw on the more adventure hero type of narratives their work is questioned.’ S. Mills, Discourses of Difference: An Analysis of Women’s Travel Writing and Colonialism (London: Routledge, 1991), p. 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 99.
    S. Foster, Across New Worlds: Nineteenth-Century Women Travellers and Their Writings (London: Harvester, 1990), p. 342.Google Scholar
  18. 115.
    A. Blunt, Travel, Gender, and Imperialism: Mary Kingsley and West Africa (London: Guilford, 1994), p. 114.Google Scholar
  19. 117.
    ‘Later friends included Anne Plumptre, Amelia Opie, the Wordsworths, and Lady Sydney Morgan, all known for their “Jacobinical” opinions at one time or another.’ N. Watson, Revolution and the Form of the British Novel 1790–1825 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), p. 29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Glenn Hooper 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glenn Hooper

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations