Skip to main content

European Federal Integration: The Case Against (1996)

  • Chapter
European Integration
  • 38 Accesses

Abstract

I would like to challenge the three main arguments which have been advanced in recent years in favour of a federal or integrated Europe (I am using ‘federal’ and ‘integrated’ interchangeably). Firstly, is the argument that European integration has prevented war in Europe. Secondly, is the argument that the nation-state and national sovereignty are obsolete, and that supranational federalism is a superior form of governmental institution. And thirdly, is the argument that the European Union is economically successful, so that in John Major’s famous phrase, Britain should be ‘at the heart of it’.1

Lecture at Gresham College, London (1996).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, for example, J. Pinder, European Community: The Building of a Union (Oxford, 1991), Ch. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See William Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (Pan Books, 1964 edition), Ch. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Martin Holmes, From Single Market to Single Currency: Evaluating Europe’s Economic Experiment (Bruges Group publication 1995, Chapter 5 in this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Martin Holmes, Beyond Europe: Selected Essays 1989–93 (Nelson & Pollard Publishing, 1993), Chs. 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Bill Jamieson, Worlds Apart? (Bruges Group publication, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  6. For further details, see Ian Milne, Defending British Interests: Jobs, Trade and Investment, Eurofacts Review, December 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Martin Wolf, The Resistible Appeal of Fortress Europe (Trade Policy Centre, CPS; 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  8. As to how successive Tory governments from Macmillan’s onwards deluded themselves that Britain could lead, shape and change the European Community to suit British interests, see Martin Holmes, The Conservative Party and Europe (Bruges Group publication 1994, Chapter 2 in this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.J.P. Taylor, English History 1914–45 (Pelican, 1970 edition), p. 727.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2001 Martin Holmes

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holmes, M. (2001). European Federal Integration: The Case Against (1996). In: European Integration. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510753_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics