Mrs Prest and the True Church: the Necessity of Disobedience

  • Megan L. Hickerson

Abstract

By the time he returned to England from his Marian exile in 1559, Foxe had been labouring over his history of the church for several years. The Acts and Monuments continued to develop as a project until his death in 1587, changing and growing from edition to edition; in this respect, it was never finished. Foxe began his 1554 Commentarii during Edward Vi’s reign, and it was close to ready for publication before his departure for the continent in 1554. This, his earliest attempt to prove that reformed religion was the historic religion of the true persecuted church, was designed as a compilation of the accounts of those who had suffered for it at the hands of the papacy. It traces the persecution of the elect from 1375 (the time of Wycliffe) through the early sixteenth century, mainly concentrating on the English Lollards, access to information about whom he owed largely to his collaboration with Bale. The Commentarii was intended to be the first volume of two, the second to cover the trials of the true church through the Tudor persecutions, but this second volume never appeared.1

Keywords

Manifold Europe Shipping Explosive Assure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 4.
    This is not, however, the first martyrology to include accounts of the deaths of Marian martyrs. Jean Crespin was the first to publish information (as martyrology) about the Marian burnings, using as his source martyrs’ letters circulating among the exiles in Geneva (Jean Crespin, Troisieme partie du recueil des martyrs [Geneva: Jean Crespin, 1556]). Foxe did not, however, draw on Crespin’s work for the Rerum, probably because it is in French, which he did not read.Google Scholar
  2. David Watson, ‘Jean Crespin and the First English Martyrology of the Reformation’, in John Foxe and the English Reformation, ed. David Loades (Aldershot: Scolar Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    Thomas Betteridge, ‘From Prophetic to Apocalyptic: John Foxe and the Writing of History’, in John Foxe and the English Reformation, ed. David Loades (London: Scholar Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  4. 10.
    Patrick Collinson, The Elizabethan Puritan Movement (London: Jonathan Cape, 1967), 36.Google Scholar
  5. 24.
    See Catharine Davies, ‘“Poor Persecuted Little Flock” or “Commonwealth of Christians”: Edwardian Protestant Concepts of the Church’, in Protestantism and the National Church in Sixteenth Century England, ed. Peter Lake and Maria Dowling (London and New York: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar
  6. 25.
    Davies ‘persecuted flock’-Protestants overlap to an extent with the men identified by Alec Ryrie as early English ‘covenant-theology’ reformers, who he sees opposing the more Lutheran, ‘godly prince’ evangelicals in 1540s Henrician England. When ‘forced to choose between king and Bible’, Ryrie notes, they ‘knew where their final loyalties lay’ (Alec Ryrie, ‘The Strange Death of Lutheran England’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History 53, 1 [January 2002]: 86).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 26.
    ‘Gestant enim legittimum gladium, quem nobis nullo pacto ipsis è manibus extorquere licet, quibus adeo omnem obedient iam praecipit Christiana professio’ (John Foxe, De non plectendis morte adulteris consultatio [London: Hugh Syngleton, 1548], Aiiii[v]).Google Scholar
  8. 30.
    Catharine Davies and Jane Facey, ‘A Reformation Dilemma: John Foxe and the Problem of Discipline’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History 39, 1 (January 1988): 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 34.
    Susan Felch, ‘Shaping the Reader in the Acts and Monuments’, in John Foxe and the English Reformation, ed. David Loades (London: Scholar Press, 1997), 57.Google Scholar
  10. 36.
    The choice of Foxe to deliver this sermon is interesting. Warren Wooden suggests that it marks the esteem with which he was held by the Anglican Church establishment, as well as by the common people (Warren Wooden, ed., The English Sermons of John Foxe: Facsimile Reproductions with an introduction [New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints, 1978], vii). However, given the problem of Puritan dissent and noncomformity within the church, and both Foxe’s fame and his known association with the early Puritan movement, might not his selection also have been a savvy exercise in public relations? Both Lawrence Humphrey and Thomas Sampson were appointed to preach at Paul’s Cross at Easter, 1565, despite their recognition as leaders of nonconformity during the vestments controversy (and at a time when Archbishop Parker was planning their deprivation). Alternatively, selecting Humphrey and Sampson in 1565, and Foxe in 1570, if the appointments were engineered by Grindal, might have reflected his personal sympathy with their cause.Google Scholar
  11. 37.
    John Foxe, A Sermon of Christ crucified, preached at Paules Crosse the Friday before Easter, commonly called Goodfryday: Written and dedicated to all such as labour and be heavy laden in conscience, to be read for their spirituall comfort (London: John Daye, 1570), Aiii(r).Google Scholar
  12. 44.
    David Loades, ‘John Foxe and the Godly Commonwealth’, in David Loades, John Foxe: Essays 1 (Oxford: the Davenant Press, 2001), 11.Google Scholar
  13. 45.
    David Loades, ‘John Foxe and the Traitors: the Politics of the Marian Persecution’, in Martyrs and Martyrologies: Papers Read at the 1992 Summer Meeting and the 1993 Winter Meeting of the Ecclesiastical History Society, ed. Diana Wood (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1993), 231.Google Scholar
  14. 47.
    See Peter Lake, Anglicans and Puritans: Presbyterianism and English Conformist Thought from Whitgift to Hooker (London: Unwin Hyman, 1988);Google Scholar
  15. 48.
    Anthony Milton, ‘The Church of England, Rome, and the True Church: the Demise of a Jacobean Consensus’, in The Early Stuart Church, 1603–1642, ed. Ken Fincham (London: Macmillan, 1993).Google Scholar
  16. 49.
    While agreeing that Queen Mary was a Jezebel, Foxe probably disapproved of Knox’s assertions against female rule itself: a letter to the Scot following publication of the First Blast resulted in a vaguely apologetic response. Knox’s letter to Foxe is BL MS Harleian 416, 70r.Google Scholar
  17. Paula Louise Scalingi, ‘The Scepter or the Distaff: The Question of Female Sovereignty, 1516–1607’, The Historian 41, 1 [1978]: 66–7).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 58.
    Gerry Bowler, ‘Marian Protestants and the Idea of Violent Resistance to Tyranny’, in Protestantism and the National Church in Sixteenth Century England, ed. Peter Lake and Maria Dowling (London and New York: Croom Helm, 1987), 124.Google Scholar
  19. 61.
    John Ponet, A Shorte Treatise of Politike Power … (Strassborg: 1556), Gix(r).Google Scholar
  20. 63.
    John Foxe, Ad Inclytos ac Praepotentes Angliae Proceres Supplicatio (Basle: Oporinus, 1557).Google Scholar
  21. 75.
    See, for example, John Cashmere, ‘The Social Uses of Violence in Ritual’, European History Quarterly 21, 3 (1991): 291–319;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Natalie Zemon Davis, ‘The Reasons of Misrule: Youth Groups and Charivari in Sixteenth Century France’, Past and Present 50 (February 1971): 41–75;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. S. Hindle, ‘The Shaming of Margaret Knowsley: Gossip, Gender and the Experience of Authority in Early Modern England’, Continuity and Change 9 (1994): 391–419;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ingram, ‘Ridings, Rough Music and Mocking Rhymes’; D. Rollison, ‘Property, Ideology and Popular Culture in a Gloucestershire Village, 1660–1740’, Past and Present 43 (1981): 70–97.Google Scholar
  25. 76.
    Susan C. Karant Nunn, ‘The Reformation of Women’, in Becoming Visible: Women in European History, third edn, ed. Renate Bridenthal, Susan Mosher Stuard and Merry E. Wiesner (Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1998), 184–7.Google Scholar
  26. 77.
    Amussen, An Ordered Society. Sarah Hanley sees this occurring in France through the promulgation of new laws governing marriage, and Joel Harrington, for Germany, through enhanced enforcement of existing laws. See Sarah Hanley, ‘Family and State in Early Modern France: the Marital Law Compact’, in Connecting Spheres: European Women in a Globalizing World, 1500 to the Present, second edn, ed. Marilyn J. Boxer and Jean H. Quartaert (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000); Joel F. Harrington, Reordering Marriage and Society in Reformation Germany (New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  27. 78.
    See Amussen, An Ordered Society, and Roper, Oedipus and the Devil, 37. Also, Julie Hardwick, The Practice of Patriarchy: Gender and Politics of Household Authority in Early Modern France (University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1998), xi, 221. This was so at least on a rhetorical level. As Hardwick notes in her study of the ‘middling sort’ in France (her focus is notaries and their families), however, ‘in a society that was ideologically and rhetorically fiercely patriarchal, many individual instances show that women and subjects had considerable room to maneuver’ (226). On patriarchal thought in early modern England, see also Gordon Schochet, Patriarchalism in Political Thought: The Authoritarian Family and Political Speculation and Attitudes Especially in Seventeenth-Century England (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1975).Google Scholar
  28. 79.
    See Merry E. Wiesner, ‘The Early Modern Period: Religion, the Family, and Women’s Public Roles’, in Religion, Feminism, and the Family, ed. Anne Carr and Mary Stewart Van Leeuwen (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1996), 150–2. What Carole Pateman calls ‘traditional patriarchal thought’ assumed that ‘the family, and the authority of the father at its head, provided the model or the metaphor for power and authority relations of all kinds’, assimilating all power relations into paternal rule (Carol Pateman, The Sexual Contract [Cambridge: The Polity Press, 1988], 23–4). See also Schochet, Patriarchalism, 16.Google Scholar
  29. 89.
    Anne Wentworth, A Vindication of Anne Wentworth (London, 1677), 4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Megan L. Hickerson 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Megan L. Hickerson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations